Skip to main content
Log in

A self-organizing predictive map for non-life insurance

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
European Actuarial Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the capacity of self-organizing maps (SOMs) for analysing non-life insurance data. Contrary to feed forward neural networks, also called perceptron, a SOM does not need any a priori information on the relevancy of variables. During the learning procedure, the SOM algorithm selects the most relevant combination of explanatory variables and reduces by this way the collinearity bias. However, the specific features of insurance data require adapting the classic SOM framework to manage categorical variables and the low frequency of claims. This work proposes several extensions of SOMs in order to study the claims frequency of a portfolio of motorcycle insurances. Results are next compared to these computed with variants of the k-mean clustering algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In our approach, codebooks are randomly chosen. An alternative consists to use the initialization procedure of the k-means algorithm, presented in Sect. 2.2.

  2. A variant of this algorithm consists to recompute immediately the new position of centroids after assignment of each records of the dataset.

References

  1. Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S (2007) \(K\)-means\(++\): the advantages of careful seeding. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, SODA’ 07, pp 1027–1035

  2. Benzécri JP (1973) L’ analyse des données, T2, l’ analyse des correspondances. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brockett P, Cooper W, Golden L, Pitaktong U (1994) A neural network method for obtaining an early warning of insurer insolvency. J Risk Insur 61(3):402–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brockett P, Xia X, Derrig R (1998) Using Kohonen’s self-organizing feature map to uncover automobile bodily injury claims fraud. J Risk Insur 65(2):245–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brockett P, Golden L, Jang J, Yang C (2006) A comparison of neural network, statistical methods, and variable choice for life insurers’ financial distress prediction. J Risk Insur 73(3):397–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burt C (1950) The factorial analysis of qualitative data. Br J Psychol 3:166–185

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cottrell M, Ibbou S, Letrémy P (2004) SOM-based algorithms for qualitative variables. Neural netw 17:1149–1167

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenacre MJ (1984) Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hainaut D (2018) A neural-network analyzer for mortality forecast. ASTIN Bull 48(2):1–28

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Huysmans J, Baesens B, Vanthienen J, Van Gestel T (2006) Failure prediction with self organizing maps. Expert Syst Appl 30(3):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG (1991) Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern 43(1):59–69

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lebart L, Morineau A, Warwick KM (1984) Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis: correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lloyd SP (1957) Least square quantization in PCM (Bell telephone laboratories paper. Published in journal much later: Lloyd., S. P., 1982). IEEE Trans Inf Theory 28(2):129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogunnaike RM, Si D (2017) Prediction of insurance claim severity loss using regression models. In: Proceedings of the 13th conference on machine learning and data mining. Springer, New York, pp 233–247

  16. Ohlsson E, Johansson B (2010) Non-life insurance pricing with generalized linear models. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenblatt F (1958) The perceptron: a probabilistic model, for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65(6):386–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakthivel KM, Rajitha CS (2017) A comparative study of zero-inflated, hurdle models with artificial neural network in claim count modeling. Int J Stat Syst 12(2):265–276

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wütrich M, Buser C (2017) Data analytics for non-life insurance pricing. In: Lectures notes. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2870308

  20. Viaene S, Derrig RA, Baesens B, Dedene G (2002) A comparison of state-of-the-art classification techniques for expert automobile insurance claim fraud detection. J Risk Insur 69:373–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledges the BNP Cardif Chair “Data Analytics and Models for Insurance” for its financial support. I also thank Michel Denuit from the UCL for his constructive advices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donatien Hainaut.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hainaut, D. A self-organizing predictive map for non-life insurance. Eur. Actuar. J. 9, 173–207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-018-0189-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-018-0189-z

Keywords

Navigation