Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Performance of Low-GWP Refrigerants as Substitutes for R134a in a Vapor Compression Refrigeration System

  • Research Article-Mechanical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study predicts numerically the performance of low-GWP refrigerants [R152a, R1234yf and R1234ze(E)] as an alternative to R134a in a vapor compression refrigeration system. The plate heat exchanger was used as a condenser, and the appropriate correlations available in the published literature were used to predict the heat transfer coefficients and friction factors of refrigerants during condensation. Drop-in analysis based on the same conditions of the cooling medium (water) was considered, and the system was modeled in EES software. For this analysis, the inlet temperature of the water was varied from 15 to 40 °C as an input, and its effect on the performance parameters (condensation temperature, input power, discharge temperature, compression ratio, cooling capacity and COP) was analyzed and compared with R134a. The correlation used in this study predicts the better performance of R152a and R1234ze(E) as their heat transfer coefficient values are found to be 67–72% and 0.85–3% higher at condensation temperatures of 40–55 °C, respectively, when compared with R134a. The trends for the predicted frictional pressure drops are also found to be similar. For the drop-in analysis based on the same cooling medium conditions, simulation results reveal better performance for R152a and R1234ze(E). R152a shows 6.3–11% higher COP relative to R134a, whereas R1234yf shows lower COP of 7.6–12%, for the range of cooling water inlet temperatures considered in this study. Simulation results conclude that R152a seems more adequate refrigerant as an alternative of R134a in vapor compression refrigeration system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

COP:

Coefficient of performance

A o :

Cross-sectional area (m2)

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

h :

Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)

CR:

Compression ratio

N :

Engine speed (rpm)

D :

Compressor displacement (m3/rev)

P :

Pressure (kPa)

D h :

Hydraulic diameter (mm)

b :

Amplitude of corrugation (mm)

Q C :

Heat transfer in condenser (kW)

c p :

Specific heat at constant pressure (kJ/kg K)

T :

Temperature (K)

U :

Overall heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)

A :

Effective area (m2)

\( \Delta T_{\text{lm}} \) :

Logarithmic mean temperature difference (K)

N p :

Number of plates

L p :

Port to port length (mm)

D p :

Diameter of port (mm)

W :

Width (mm)

h :

Heat transfer coefficient of water (W/m2 K)

G :

Mass flux (kg/m2 s)

L :

Length of plate (mm)

f :

Friction factor

\( \Delta P \) :

Pressure drop (kPa)

x :

Quality

We:

Weber number

Nu:

Nusselt number

Pr:

Prandtl number

k :

Thermal conductivity (W/mK)

g :

Gravitational acceleration (m/s2)

Bo:

Bond number

\( \eta \) :

Efficiency of compressor

\( \rho \) :

Density (kg/m3)

\( \varphi \) :

Enlargement factor of corrugation surface

\( \lambda \) :

Corrugation pitch (mm)

\( \gamma \) :

Dimensionless corrugation parameter

\( \sigma \) :

Surface tension (N/m)

\( \beta \) :

Chevron angle (°)

wf:

Working fluid (refrigerant)

W:

Water

wall:

Wall

h:

Hydraulic

l:

Liquid

v:

Vapor

eq:

Equivalent

m:

Mean

s:

Isentropic

v:

Volumetric

fri:

Frictional

comp:

Compressor

C:

Condensation

E:

Evaporator

HFCs:

Hydrofluorocarbons

CFCs:

Chlorofluorocarbons

ODP:

Ozone depletion potential

GWP:

Global warming potential

VCRC:

Vapor compression refrigeration cycle

HFOs:

Hydrofluoroolefins

AACS:

Automotive air conditioning system

EES:

Engineering equation solver

References

  1. Lee, Y.; Jung, D.: A brief performance comparison of R1234yf and R134a in a bench tester for automobile applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 35, 240–242 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, J.S.; Zilio, C.; Cavallini, A.: Thermodynamic properties of eight fluorinated olefins. Int. J. Refrig. 33(2), 235–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. IISD/SDG Knowledge Hub. Kigali Amendment Enters into Force, Bringing Promise of Reduced Global Warming. 2020 [cited 2020 2/1/2020]; https://sdg.iisd.org/news/kigali-amendment-enters-into-force-bringing-promise-of-reduced-global-warming/

  4. Meng, Z.; et al.: Performance of low GWP R1234yf/R134a mixture as a replacement for R134a in automotive air conditioning systems. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 116, 362–370 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diani, A.; et al.: Low GWP refrigerants condensation inside a 2.4 mm ID microfin tube. Int. J. Refrig. 86, 312–321 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, J.; et al.: Condensation heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of R134a, R1234ze(E), R245fa and R1233zd(E) in a plate heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 128, 136–149 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daviran, S.; et al.: A comparative study on the performance of HFO-1234yf and HFC-134a as an alternative in automotive air conditioning systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 110, 1091–1100 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Janković, Z.; Atienza, J.S.; Suárez, J.A.M.: Thermodynamic and heat transfer analyses for R1234yf and R1234ze (E) as drop-in replacements for R134a in a small power refrigerating system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 80, 42–54 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sumerua, K., et al.: Comparative performance between R134a and R152a in an air conditioning system of a passenger car. Jurnal Teknologi. 78, 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jarall, S.: Study of refrigeration system with HFO-1234yf as a working fluid. Int. J. Refrig. 35(6), 1668–1677 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Belman-Flores, J.; et al.: Energy and exergy analysis of R1234yf as drop-in replacement for R134a in a domestic refrigeration system. Energy 132, 116–125 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jemaa, R.B.; et al.: Energy and exergy investigation of R1234ze as R134a replacement in vapor compression chillers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42(17), 12877–12887 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta, S.; et al.: Thermodynamic analysis and effects of replacing HFC by fourth-generation refrigerants in VCR systems. Int. J. Air-Cond. Refrig. 26(02), 1850013 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sánchez, D.; et al.: Energy performance evaluation of R1234yf, R1234ze (E), R600a, R290 and R152a as low-GWP R134a alternatives. Int. J. Refrig. 74, 269–282 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bolaji, B.: Experimental study of R152a and R32 to replace R134a in a domestic refrigerator. Energy 35(9), 3793–3798 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karber, K.M.; Abdelaziz, O.; Vineyard, E.A.: Experimental performance of R-1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R-134a in domestic refrigerators. International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. Paper 1228 (2012)

  17. Shapiro, D.: Drop-in testing of next-generation R134a alternates in a commercial bottle cooler/freezer. International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference. Paper 1185 (2012)

  18. Abraham, J.A.P.; Mohanraj, M.: Thermodynamic performance of automobile air conditioners working with R430A as a drop-in substitute to R134a. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 136(5), 2071–2086 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The Australian Institute of Refrigeration, A.c.a.H.A., Methods of calculating Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI) 2012—Best Practice Guidelines, p. 21 (2012)

  20. Aprea, C.; et al.: HFO1234ze as drop-in replacement for R134a in domestic refrigerators: an environmental impact analysis. Energy Procedia 101, 964–971 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Longhini, M.: Next generation of refrigerants for residential heat pump systems. September 2015, Tecnico Lisboa

  22. Brander, M., et al.: Technical Paper|Electricity-Specific Emission Factors For Grid Electricity. Ecometrica, Emissionfactors.com (2011)

  23. El-Talouny, A.; Nielsen, O.: Promoting Low-GWP Refrigerants for Air-Conditioning Sectors in High-Ambient Temperature Countries (PRAHA). 2014, UNEP and UNIDO, OzonAction Fact Sheet-November

  24. Engineering Equation Solver. EES Version 9.944, F-chart software

  25. Aized, T.; Hamza, A.: Thermodynamic analysis of various refrigerants for automotive air conditioning system. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 44(2), 1697–1707 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fukuda, S.; et al.: Low GWP refrigerants R1234ze (E) and R1234ze (Z) for high temperature heat pumps. Int. J. Refrig. 40, 161–173 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tauseef Aized Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamza, A., Khan, T.A. Comparative Performance of Low-GWP Refrigerants as Substitutes for R134a in a Vapor Compression Refrigeration System. Arab J Sci Eng 45, 5697–5712 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04525-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04525-3

Keywords

Navigation