Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coupling Intrinsic Vulnerability Mapping and Tracer Test for Source Vulnerability and Risk Assessment in a Karst Catchment Based on EPIK Method: A Case Study for the Xingshan County, Southern China

  • Research Article - Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amid surging population and industrial growth, there is a need to assess the vulnerability of groundwater to pollution. In this study, the case of Xingshan County in South China where karst groundwater is a major water source is presented. Field survey revealed hazardous landuse practices in highly karstified areas. To delineate areas of high vulnerability, an intrinsic vulnerability map (IVM) was created based on the EPIK (Epikarst, Protective cover, Infiltration condition, Karst network) method. Results show that 10.1, 25.8, 58.7 and 5.3% of the area are of low, medium, high and very high vulnerability. Although IVMs are powerful tools since they highlight areas of high “intrinsic” susceptibility to pollution, they do not answer the important question, “what sources are at immediate risk.” With this limitation, tracer technique was coupled with IVM to establish a link to resources/sources. Rhodamine and uranine were injected into two sinkholes in high vulnerability zones near hazardous activities. Both were detected 57.3 and 5.65 h after injection at a major spring (Bailongquan). This established link validates the IVM and highlights specific sources at risk. This study demonstrates the need to couple IVMs with tracer test in order to prioritize areas to probe in order to determine the extent of their impact by establishing active karstic groundwater flow paths. The case here is an example of source/resource vulnerability assessment, hazard/risk assessment and validation of an IVM. Our findings present a cost-effective approach to vulnerability assessment by emphasizing the reliability of EPIK method as it requires less data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milanovic, P.T.: Water Resources Engineering in Karst. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford, D.; Williams, P.: Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology. Wiley, New York (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Sweeting, M.M.: Karst in China: Its Geomorphology and Environment, vol. 14, pp. 413–426. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Escolero, O.A.; Marin, L.E.; Steinich, B.; Pacheco, A.J.; Cabrera, S.A.; Alcocer, J.: Development of a protection strategy of Karst Limestone Aquifers: The Merida Yucatan, Mexico Case Study. Water Resour. Manag. 16(5), 351–367 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Misstear, B.; Daly, D.; Brown, L.: Groundwater recharge and its relationship to river flow in Ireland. In: Irish National Hydrology Conference. CiteWeb id: 20092294561 (2009)

  6. Foster, S.; Garduno, H.; Kemper, K.; Tuinhof, A.; Nanni, M.; Dumars, C.: World Bank Sustainable Groundwater Management: Concepts and Tools, Groundwater Quality Protection Defining Strategy and Setting Priorities. GW-MATE Briefing Note Series, World Bank, Washington, DC (2003)

  7. Bonacci, O.: Karst Aquifers—Characterization and Engineering, Professional Practice in Earth Sciences (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12850-4_2

  8. Goldscheider, N.: Karst Aquifers—Characterization and Engineering, Professional Practice in Earth Sciences (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12850-4_2

  9. Luo, M.M.; Chen, Z.H.; Yin, D.C.; Jakada, H.; Huang, H.; Zhou, H.; Wang, T.: Surface flood and underground flood in Xiangxi River Karst Basin: characteristics, models, and comparisons. J. Earth Sci. 27(1), 15–21 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koulli, M.; Lydakis-Simantiris, N.; Soupios, P.: GIS Based Aquifer Modelling and Planning Using Integrated Geoenvironmental and Chemical Approaches. Groundwater Modelling, Management and Contamination. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marín, A.; Bartolomé, A: Karst Aquifers—Characterization and Engineering, Professional Practice in Earth Sciences (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12850-4_2

  12. Margat, J.: Vulnerabilite des nappesd’eausouterraine a la pollution: bases de la cartographie [Vulnerability of groundwater to pollution: database mapping]. BRGM Publication 68-SGL 198, BRGM, Orleans (1968)

  13. Foster, S.; Hirata, R.: Groundwater Pollution Risk Assessment—A Methodology Using Available Data. Pan American Center for Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Lima (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doerfliger, N.; Zwahlen, F.: Practical Guide. Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping in Karstic Regions (EPIK). Swiss Agency for the Environment Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Bern (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aller, L.; Bennett, T.; Lehr, J.H.; Petty, R.H.; Hackett, G.: DRASTIC: a standardised system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings, US EPA Report 600/2-87/035. Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma (1987)

  16. Civita, M., De Maio, M.: SINTACS: un sistema parametrico per la valutazione e la cartografia delle vulnerabilita ‘degli acquiferi all’inquinamento. Metodologia e automatizzazione. Pitagora Editrice (1997). ISBN:8837108990

  17. Doerfliger, N.; Jeannin, P.-Y.; Zwahlen, F.: Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environ. Geol. 39, 165 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldscheider, N.; Klute, M.; Sturm, S.; Hotzl, H.: The PI method—a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z. Angew. Geol. 46, 157–166 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vias, J.M.; Andreo, B.; Perles, M.J.; Carrasco, F.; Vadillo, I.; Jimenez, P.: Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method. Hydrogeol. J. 14, 912–925 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0023-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polemio, M.; Casarano, D.; Limoni, P.P.: Karstic aquifer vulnerability assessment methods and results at a test site (Apulia, southern Italy). Nat. Hazard. Earth. Syst. 9, 1461–1470 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Plagnes, V.; et al.: PaPRIKa, the French multicriteria method for mapping the intrinsic vulnerability of karst water resource and source: two examples (Pyrenees, Normandy). In: Andreo, B., Carrasco, F., Dura’n, J.J., LaMoreaux, J.W. (eds.) Advances in Research in Karst Media, pp. 323–328. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12486-0_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Andreo, B.; Goldscheider, N.; Vadillo, I.; María Vías, J.; Neukum, C.; Sinreich, M.; Jiménez, P.; Carrasco, F.; Hötzl, H.; Jesús Perles, M.; Zwahlen, F.: Karst groundwater protection: first application of a Pan-European Approach to vulnerability, hazard and risk mapping in the Sierra de Libar (Southern Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 357, 54–73 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Andreo, B.; Ravbar, N.; Vias, J.M.: Source vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) aquifers by extension of the COP method: application to pilot sites. Hydrogeol. J. 17, 749–758 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0391-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeannin, P.-Y.; Cornaton, F.; Zwahlen, F.; Perrochet, P.: VULK: a tool for intrinsic vulnerability assessment and validation. Sciences et techniques de l’environnementMe’moire hors-se’rie, pp. 185–190. (2001). ISSN:1626-4746

  25. Gogu, R.C.; Hallet, V.; Dassargues, A.: Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques: application to the Neblon river basin (Belgium). Environ. Geol. 44, 881–892 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0842-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vias, J.M.; Andreo, B.; Perles, M.J.; Carrasco, F.: A comparative study of four schemes for groundwater vulnerability mapping in a diffuse flow carbonate aquifer under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Environ. Geol. 47, 586–595 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1185-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Margane, A.: Guideline for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping and Risk Assessment for the Susceptibility of Groundwater to Contamination. Federal Institute of Geosciences and Natural Resources BGR, Hannover (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Iva’n, V.; Ma’dl-Szonyi, J.: State of the art of karst vulnerability assessment: overview, evaluation and outlook. Environ. Earth Sci. 76, 112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6422-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ravbar, N.; Goldscheider, N.: Comparative application of four methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping in a Slovene karst catchment. Hydrogeol. J. 17, 725–733 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0368-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Doerfliger, N.; Jeannin, P.Y.; Zwahlen, F.: Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environ. Geol. 39, 165–176 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Beddows, P.A.: Cave hydrology of the Caribbean Yucatan coast. Assoc. Mexican Cave Stud. Bull. 11, 96 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by China Geological Survey (No. 12120113103800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China

    Hamza Jakada, Zhihua Chen, Zhaohui Luo, Mingming Luo & Abdullateef Ibrahim

  2. Geological Survey of China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China

    Hong Zhou

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Baze University Abuja, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria

    Nuradeen Tanko

Authors
  1. Hamza Jakada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhihua Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaohui Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mingming Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Abdullateef Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nuradeen Tanko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamza Jakada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakada, H., Chen, Z., Luo, Z. et al. Coupling Intrinsic Vulnerability Mapping and Tracer Test for Source Vulnerability and Risk Assessment in a Karst Catchment Based on EPIK Method: A Case Study for the Xingshan County, Southern China. Arab J Sci Eng 44, 377–389 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3392-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3392-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation