Abstract
Despite their economic, cultural, and ecological significance, the phylogenetic relationships among North American deer remain uncertain, due in part to discordance between phylogenies built from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and nuclear markers. Nuclear markers resolve mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) as reciprocally monophyletic, but mtDNA results in a mixed topology. These two genomic regions have heretofore been analyzed in isolation. We compared phylogenies built from mtDNA cytochrome b and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the mitogenome and nuclear (ultraconserved elements, UCEs) markers from the same individuals to investigate mito-nuclear discordance within and between taxa in the genus Odocoileus. A Cyt b tree shows haplotype sharing between O. hemionus and O. virginianus. Mitochondrial DNA SNPs separated only O. hemionus and O. virginianus, whereas nuclear SNPs separated O. hemionus, O. virginianus, and the distinct subspecies Coues deer (O. v. couesi), Key deer (O. v. clavium), and Sitka black-tailed deer (O. h. sitkensis) plus Columbian black-tailed deer (O. h. columbianus). We found less support for O. h. columbianus as a distinct taxon, which had signs of introgression with nominate O. h. hemionus. The well-established paraphyly of mtDNA haplotypes from O. virginianus and O. hemionus is confirmed with comparisons of mtDNA and nuclear-encoded SNPs from the same individuals. Our attempts to explain mito-nuclear discordance among Odocoileus deer remain inconclusive. We suspect incomplete lineage sorting of a recent evolutionary split may explain this pattern, although mtDNA capture via ancient hybridization is also a possibility. Niche models suggested allopatric refugia at the Last Glacial Maximum for these taxa except for a parapatric or sympatric distribution estimated for O. virginianus and O. v. clavium and O. hemionus and O. h. columbianus, the latter of which might explain the modern hybrid zone.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are in GenBank and will be deposited in Dryad (UCE).
Code availability
All code and corresponding data used to produce presented results are available in the article and Online Resources.
References
Bradley RD, Ammerman LK, Baker RJ, Bradley LC, Cook JA, Dowler RC, Jones C, Schmidly DJ, Stangl FB, Van Den Bussche RA, Würsig BG (2014) Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico. Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Bradley RD, Bryant FC, Bradley LC, Haynie ML, Baker RJ (2003) Implications of hybridization between white-tailed deer and mule deer. Southwest Nat 48:454–660
Caire W, Loucks LS, Haynie ML, Coyner BS, Braun JK (2019) Updated and revised checklist of the mammals of Oklahoma. In Proc OK Acad Sci 99:1–6
Carr SM, Ballinger SW, Derr JN, Blankenship LH, Bickham JW (1986) Mitochondrial DNA analysis of hybridization between sympatric white-tailed deer and mule deer in west Texas. Proc Nat Acad Sci 83:9576–9580
Cathey JC, Bickham JW, Patton JC (1998) Introgressive hybridization and nonconcordant evolutionary history of maternal and paternal lineages in North American deer. Evolution 52:1224–1229
Chafin TK, Zbinden ZD, Douglas MR, Martin BT, Middaugh CR, Gray MC, Ballard JR, Douglas ME (2021) Spatial population genetics in heavily managed species: separating patterns of historical translocation from contemporary gene flow in white-tailed deer. Evol Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13233
Chifman J, Kubatko L (2014) Quartet inference from SNP data under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 30:3317–3324
Combe FJ, Jaster L, Ricketts A, Haukos D, Hope AG (2022) Population genomics of free-ranging Great Plains white-tailed and mule deer reflects a long history of interspecific hybridization. Evol Appl 15:111–131
Cronin MA, Rincon G, Meredith RW, MacNeil MD, Islas-Trejo A, Cánovas A, Medrano JF (2014) Molecular phylogeny and SNP variation of polar bears (Ursus maritimus), brown bears (U. arctos), and black bears (U. americanus) derived from genome sequences. J Hered 105:312–323
Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudık M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of Maxent for ecologists. Diver Dist 17:43–57
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Faircloth BC, McCormack JE, Crawford NG, Harvey MG, Brumfield RT, Glenn TC (2012) Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst Bio 61:717–726
Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM, McDonough MM, Bauer F, Hawkins MT, Escobedo-Morales LA, Patterson BD, Maldonado JE (2017) A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: the importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling. ZooKeys 697:87–131
Hailer F (2008) Leonard JA (2008) Hybridization among three native North American Canis species in a region of natural sympatry. PLoS ONE 3(10):e3333
Heckeberg NS (2020) The systematics of the Cervidae: a total evidence approach. PeerJ 8:e8114
Heffelfinger J (2011) Taxonomy, evolutionary history, and distribution. Pp. 3–42, in Biology and Management of White-tailed Deer, D. G. Hewitt, ed. CRC Press
Heffelfinger JR, Latch EK (2023) Origin, classification, and distribution. In: Heffelfinger JR, Krausman PR (eds) Ecology and management of black-tailed and mule deer in North America. CRC Press
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978
Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Mathur P (2012) DIVA-GIS. Version. 7.5. http://www.diva-gis.org/
Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Haeseler AV, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 35:518–522
Hopken MW, Lum TM, Meyers PM, Piaggio AJ (2015) Molecular assessment of translocation and management of an endangered subspecies of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Cons Genet 16:635–647
Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:1–5
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Meth 14:587–589
Latch EK, and Heffelfinger JR (2022) Genetics informs meaningful intraspecific taxonomy: the black-tailed and mule deer complex. Anim Prod Sci
Latch EK, Heffelfinger JR, Fike JA, Rhodes OE Jr (2009) Species-wide phylogeography of North American mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus): cryptic glacial refugia and postglacial recolonization. Mole Ecol 18:1730–1745
Latch EK, Kierepka EM, Heffelfinger JR, Rhodes OE Jr (2011) Hybrid swarm between divergent lineages of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Mole Ecol 20:5265–5279
Latch EK, Reding DM, Heffelfinger JR, Alcalá-Galván CH, Rhodes OE Jr (2014) Range-wide analysis of genetic structure in a widespread, highly mobile species (Odocoileus hemionus) reveals the importance of historical biogeography. Mole Ecol 23:3171–3190
Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinfor 25:1754–1760
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinfor 25:2078–2079
Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R (2020) IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology Evolution 37:1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
Mock K, Latch E, Rhodes OE (2004) Assessing losses of genetic diversity due to translocation: long-term case histories in Merriam’s turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami). Cons Genet 5:631
Nakamoto A, Harada M, Mitsuhashi R, Tsuchiya K, Kryukov AP, Shinohara A, Suzuki H (2021) Influence of quaternary environmental changes on mole populations inferred from mitochondrial sequences and evolutionary rate estimation. Zoo Let 7:1–11
Peterson A (2001) Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. The Condor 103:599–605
Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martínez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, Araújo MB (2011) Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genet 155:945–959
Ramírez-Pulido J, González-Ruiz N, Gardner AL, Arroyo-Cabrales J (2014) List of recent land mammals of Mexico. https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/33974/2014%20List%20of%20recent%20land%20mammals%20Mexico.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Roca AL, O’Brien SJ (2005) Genomic inferences from Afrotheria and the evolution of elephants. Curr Opin Genet Devel 15:652–659
Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A (2017) DnaSP v6. DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large datasets. Mol Biol Evol 34:3299–3302
Russell T, Cullingham C, Ball M, Pybus M, Coltman D (2021) Extent and direction of introgressive hybridization of mule and white-tailed deer in western Canada. Evol Appl 14:1914–1925
Schummer ML, Simpson J, Shirkey B, Kucia SR, Lavretsky P, Tozer DC (2023) (2023) Population genetics and geographic origins of mallards harvested in northwestern Ohio. PLoS ONE 18(3):e0282874
Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (2001) CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246–1247
Smith WP (1991) Odocoileus virginianus. Mamm Sp 388:1–13
Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinfor 30:1312–1313
Swofford DL (2023) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using PAUP, version 4.0a 169. https://paup.phylosolutions.com/
Vázquez-Miranda H, Zink RM (2020) Geographic distribution of chronic wasting disease resistant alleles in Nebraska, with comments on the evolution of resistance. J Fish Wildl Man 11:46–55
Villanova VL, Hughes PT, Hoffman EA (2017) Combining genetic structure and demographic analyses to estimate persistence in endangered Key deer (Odocoileus virginianus clavium). Cons Genet 18:1061–1076
Wascher M, Kubatko L (2020) Consistency of SVDquartets and maximum likelihood for coalescent-based species tree estimation. Syst Biol 70:33–48
Wright EA, Roberts EK, Platt RN, Bayouth JV, Conway WC, Bradley RD (2022) Mitochondrial capture and subsequent genetic divergence generates a novel haplogroup: evidence from ancient and ongoing hybridization in mule and white-tailed deer. J Mammal 103(3):723–736
Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T, Stamatakis A (2014) PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina paired-end reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30:614–620
Zink RM, Barrowclough GF (2008) Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mole Ecol 17:2107–2121
Zink RM, Najar N, Vázquez-Miranda H, Buchanan BL, Loy D, Brodersen BW (2020) Geographic variation in the PRNP gene and its promoter, and their relationship to chronic wasting disease in North American deer. Prion 14:185–192
Acknowledgements
We received tissues from hunter-harvested deer in Nebraska via the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, thanks to K. Decker, T. Nordeen, and J. J. Lusk. We received tissue loans from L. Olson (University of Alaska-Fairbanks), J. Heffelfinger (Arizona Game and Fish Department), and K. Watts (Florida Keys National Wildlife Refuge). We thank B. Buchanan, M. Girard, and M. Olson for lab assistance.
Funding
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (w-113-r), Pope and Young Club (no grant number).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: HV-M and RMZ; data curation: LBK; formal analysis: LBK, NN, and RMZ; funding acquisition: RMZ; investigation: LBK, RMZ, and HV-M; methodology: LBK and HV-M; project administration: RMZ; resources: RMZ; software: LBK; supervision: RMZ; validation: LBK, RMZ, and HV-M; visualization: HV-M, writing—original draft preparation: RMZ; writing—review and editing: LBK, NN, RMZ, and HV-M.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study contains no studies of human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. This article is not in consideration for or published at any other journal.
Consent to participate
This study contains no human participants.
Consent for publication
No materials or figures have been published elsewhere.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Magdalena Niedziałkowska
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Specimens and GenBank identifiers for Cyt b data (see also Gutierrez et al. 2017). OH = Odocoileus hemionus, OV = O. virginianus. Subspecies identifiers given if also in provided in GenBank (although taxonomy not verified). Geographic identifiers given if listed with GenBank entry. OH and OV from Nebraska are given in GenBank MN 390611–390813 and came from the following counties (OH: Arthur, Blaine, Boone, Box Butte, Brown, Cherry, Cheyenne, Custer, Dawes, Dawson, Dundy, Frontier, Furnas, Garden, Gosper, Grant, Greeley, Hayes, Hitchcock, Hold, Keith, Keya Paha, Kimball, Loup, Morrill, Red Willow, Scotts Bluff, Sheridan; OV: Otoe, York, Seward, Johnson, Pawnee, Richardson, Cass, Box Butte, Dawes, Cherry, Howard, Hall, Custer, Buffalo, Franklin, Kearney, Harlan, Garden, Valley, Loup; (Chemung Co.) and Minnesota (Washington Co.).
AF091630_OH; AY607035_OV; DQ379370_OV; DQ673136_OV; FJ188717_OH_AB; FJ188718_OH_AB; FJ188719_OH_AB; FJ188720_OH_AB; FJ188721_OH_AB; FJ188722_OH_AB; FJ188723_OH_AB; FJ188724_OH_AB; FJ188725_OH_AB; FJ188726_OH_AB_OR; FJ188727_OH_sitkensis_AK; FJ188728_OH_sitkensis_AK; FJ188729_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188730_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188731_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188732_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188733_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188734_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188735_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188736_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188737_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188738_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188739_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188740_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188741_OH_crooki_AZ; FJ188742_OH_hemionus_AZ; FJ188743_OH_hemionus_AZ; FJ188744_OH_hemionus_AZ; FJ188745_OH_hemionus_AZ; FJ188746_OH_hemionus_AZ; FJ188747_OH_hemionus_AZ; FJ188748_OH_hemionus_AZ; FJ188749_OH_eremicus_AZ; FJ188750_OH_fuliginatus; FJ188751_OH_fuliginatus; FJ188752_OH_fuliginatus; FJ188753_OH_peninsulae; FJ188754_OH_peninsulae; FJ188755_OH_peninsulae; FJ188756_OH_peninsulae; FJ188757_OH_peninsulae; FJ188758_OH_peninsulae; FJ188759_OH_columbianus; FJ188760_OH_columbianus; FJ188761_OH_columbianus; FJ188762_OH_hemionus_BC; FJ188763_OH_hemionus_BC; FJ188764_OH_hemionus_BC; FJ188765_OH_hemionus_BC; FJ188766_OH_columbianus_BC; FJ188767_OH_hemionus_BC; FJ188768_OH_hemionus_BC; FJ188769_OH_columbianus_BC_VI; FJ188770_OH_columbianus_BC_VI; FJ188771_OH_columbianus_BC_VI; FJ188772_OH_columbianus_BC_VI; FJ188773_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188774_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188775_OH_eremicus_CA; FJ188776_OH_inyoensis_CA; FJ188777_OH_inyoensis_CA; FJ188778_OH_inyoensis_CA; FJ188779_OH_inyoensis_CA; FJ188780_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188781_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188782_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188783_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188784_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188785_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188786_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188787_OH_fuliginatus_CA; FJ188788_OH_fuliginatus_CA; FJ188789_OH_fuliginatus_CA; FJ188790_OH_fuliginatus_CA; FJ188791_OH_fuliginatus_CA; FJ188792_OH_fuliginatus_CA_; FJ188793_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188794_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188795_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188796_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188797_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188798_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188799_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188800_OH_californicus_CA; FJ188801_OH_columbianus_CA; FJ188802_OH_columbianus_CA; FJ188803_OH_columbianus_CA; FJ188804_OH_columbianus_CA; FJ188805_OH_columbianus_CA; FJ188806_OH_columbianus_CA; FJ188807_OH_columbianus_CA; FJ188808_OH_crooki; FJ188809_OH_crooki; FJ188810_OH_crooki; FJ188811_OH_crooki; FJ188812_OH_crooki; FJ188813_OH_hemionus_CO; FJ188814_OH_hemionus_CO; FJ188815_OH_hemionus_CO; FJ188816_OH_hemionus_CO; FJ188817_OH_hemionus_CO; FJ188818_OH_crooki_CU; FJ188819_OH_hemionus_ID; FJ188820_OH_hemionus_ID; FJ188821_OH_hemionus_ID; FJ188822_OH_hemionus_ID; FJ188823_OH_hemionus; FJ188824_OH_hemionus_KS; FJ188825_OH_hemionus_KS; FJ188826_OH_hemionus_KS; FJ188827_OH_hemionus_KS; FJ188828_OH_hemionus_KS; FJ188829_OH_hemionus_MT; FJ188830_OH_hemionus_MT; FJ188831_OH_hemionus_MT; FJ188832_OH_hemionus_MT7; FJ188833_OH_hemionus_MT2; FJ188834_OH_hemionus_ND2; FJ188835_OH_hemionus_ND; FJ188836_OH_hemionus_ND; FJ188837_OH_hemionus_NE; FJ188838_OH_hemionus_NE; FJ188839_OH_hemionus_NE1; FJ188840_OH_crooki_NM_02; FJ188841_OH_crooki_NM; FJ188842_OH_crooki_NM; FJ188843_OH_hemionus_NM; FJ188844_OH_hemionus_NM; FJ188845_OH_hemionus_NM; FJ188846_OH_hemionus_NM; FJ188847_OH_hemionus_NV; FJ188848_OH_hemionus_NV; FJ188849_OH_hemionus_NV; FJ188850_OH_hemionus_NV; FJ188851_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188852_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188853_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188854_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188855_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188856_OH_hemionus_OR; FJ188857_OH_hemionus_OR; FJ188858_OH_hemionus_OR; FJ188859_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188860_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188861_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188862_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188863_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188864_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188865_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188866_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188867_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188868_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188869_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188870_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188871_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188872_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188873_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188874_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188875_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188876_OH_columbianus_OR; FJ188877_OH_sitkensis; FJ188878_OH_sitkensis; FJ188879_OH_sitkensis; FJ188880_OH_sitkensis; FJ188881_OH_eremicus; FJ188882_OH_eremicus; FJ188883_OH_sheldoni; FJ188884_OH_sheldoni; FJ188885_OH_crooki_TX; FJ188886_OH_crooki_TX; FJ188887_OH_crooki_TX; FJ188888_OH_crooki_TX; FJ188889_OH_hemionus_UT; FJ188890_OH_hemionus_UT; FJ188891_OH_hemionus_WA; FJ188892_OH_columbianus_WA; FJ188893_OH_columbianus_WA; FJ188894_OH_columbianus_WA; FJ188895_OH_columbianus_WA; FJ188896_OH_hemionus_WY; FJ188897_OH_hemionus_WY; FJ188898_OH_hemionus_WY; FJ188899_OH_hemionus_YK; FJ188900_OH_hemionus_YK; HM222707_OH; JN632670_OH; JN632671_OV; JN632672_OV; JN632673_OV; KM612271_OVver; KM612272_OVyuc; KM612273_OVtex; KM612274_OVsin; KM612275_; KM612276_OV; KM612277_OV; KM612278_OV; KM612279_OV; KT877248_OV_clavium; KT877249_OV_clavium; KT877250_OV_clavium; KT877251_OV_clavium; KT877252_OV_clavium; KT877253_OV_clavium; KT877254_OV_clavium; KT877255_OV_clavium; KT877256_OV_clavium; KT877257_OV_clavium; KT877258_OV_clavium; KT877259_OV_clavium; KT877260_OV_clavium; KT877261_OV_clavium; KT877262_OV_clavium; KT877263_OV_clavium; KT877264_OV_clavium; KT877265_OV_clavium; KT877266_OV_clavium; KT877267_OV_clavium; KT877268_OV_clavium; KT877269_OV_clavium; KT877270_OV_clavium; KT877271_OV_clavium; KT877272_OV_clavium; KT877273_OV_clavium; KT877274_OV_clavium; KT877275_OV_clavium; KT877276_OV_clavium; KT877277_OV_clavium; KT877278_OV_clavium; KT877279_OV_clavium; KT877280_OV_clavium; KT877281_OV_clavium; KT877282_OV; KT877283_OV; KT877284_OV; KT877285_OV; KT877286_OV; KT877287_OV; KT877288_OV; KT877289_OV; KT877290_OV; KT877291_OV; KT877292_OV; KT877293_OV; KT877294_OV; KT877295_OV; KT877296_OV; KT877297_OV; KT877298_OV; KT877299_OV; KT877300_OV; KT877301_OV; KT877302_OV; KT877303_OV; KT877304_OV; KT877305_OV; KT877306_OV; KT877307_OV; KT877308_OV; KT877309_OV; KT877310_OV; KT877311_OV; KT877312_OV; KT877313_OV; KT877314_OV; KT877315_OV; KT877316_OV; KT877317_OV; KT877318_OV; KT877319_OV5; KT877320_OV; KT877321_OV; KT877322_OV; KT877323_OV; KT877324_OV; KT877325_OV; KT877326_OV; KT877327_OV; KT877328_OV; KT877329_OV; KT877330_OV; KT877331_OV; KT877332_OV; KT877333_OV; KT877334_OV; KT877335_OV; KT877336_OV; KT877337_OV; KT877338_OV; KT877339_OV; KT877340_OV; KT877341_OV; KT877342_OV; KT877343_OV; KT877344_OV; NC_020729_OH; AJ000029_Rangifer; MN390611-390813 (samples from Nebraska, Minnesota and New York).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Klicka, L.B., Najar, N., Vázquez-Miranda, H. et al. Relationships among North American deer based on mitochondrial DNA and ultraconserved elements, with comments on mito-nuclear discordance. Mamm Res 69, 245–255 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-024-00739-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-024-00739-0