Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of reproductive status on home range size and spatial dynamics of female Amur tigers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In populations of wild felids, social status is one of the most important factors shaping home range size and spacing patterns. For female Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica), we documented significant changes to the structure of home ranges and core areas during cub-rearing. We used VHF telemetry data collected over 18 years in Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Reserve, Russia, to assess the following: (1) home range and core area size and (2) spatial shifts with and without cubs and (3) spatial shifts associated with philopatry. Home range and core area sizes of females collapsed by 60% after birthing, with recovery requiring 18 months. We hypothesized that usurpation of temporarily abandoned territory by other females during cub-rearing was a possibility, but aside from philopatry, we did not observe a loss of territory or evidence of competition for space. Home range boundaries changed little during cub-rearing but shifting core areas revealed that females were using different segments of their home range while rearing cubs, contradicting the notion of a single, most important core area for breeding females. Our results support two hypotheses of space use by large carnivores: that adult breeding females achieve higher reproductive success by maintaining a home range just big enough to feed herself and her offspring, and a second hypothesis that females expand home range size when space is available to allocate land to daughters. We suggest that these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, but explain patterns of space use by female felids under different demographic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Bailey TN (1993) The African leopard. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barg JJ, Jones J, Robertson RJ (2005) Describing breeding territories of migratory passerines: suggestions for sampling, choice of estimator, and delineation of core areas. J Anim Ecol 74:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00906.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow ACD, Smith JLD, Ahmad IU, Hossain ANM, Mizan Rahman M, Alam Howlader A (2011) Female tiger Panthera tigris home range size in the Bangladesh Sundarbans: the value of this mangrove ecosystem for the species’ conservation. Oryx 45(1):125–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310001456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Choate D, Barrett RH (1995) Movement patterns of mountain lions during different behaviors. J Mammal 76(4):1056–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone C, Gittleman JL (2002) A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density. Science 295(5563):2273–2276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chacón JE, Duong T (2010) Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection with unconstrained pilot bandwidth matrices. Test 19:375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0168-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacon JE, Duong T (2018) Multivariate kernel smoothing and its applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429485572

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Criffield M, Van de Kerk M, Leone E, Cunningham MV, Lotz M, Oli MK, Onorato DP (2018) Assessing impacts of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on Florida panther movements. J Mammal 99(3):702–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbroch M, Lendrum PE, Quigley H, Caragiulo A (2016) Spatial overlap in a solitary carnivore: support for the land-tenure, kinship, or resource dispersion hypotheses? J Anim Ecology 85(2):487–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattebert J, Balme GA, Robinson HS, Dickerson T, Slotow R, Hunter LTB (2016) Population recovery highlights spatial organization dynamics in adult leopards. J Zool 299(3):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieberg J, Börger L (2012) Could you please phrase “home range” as a question? J Mammal 93(4):890–902. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-S-172.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieberg J, Kochanny CO (2005) Quantifying home-range overlap: the importance of the utilization distribution. J Wildl Manag 69:1346–1359. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1346:qhotio]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ (2006) Bandwidth selection for fixed-kernel analysis of animal utilization distributions. J Wildl Manag 70(5):1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1334:bsffao]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich JM, Kerley LL, Schleyer BO, Miquelle DG, Quigley KS, Smirnov YN, Nikolaev IG, Quigley HB, Hornocker MG (2001) Capture and chemical anesthesia of Amur (Siberian) tigers. Wildl Soc Bull 29:533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich JM, Kerley LL, Smirnov EN, Miquelle DG, Mcdonald L, Quigley HB, Hornocker MG, Mcdonald T (2008) Survival rates and causes of mortality of Amur Tigers on and near the Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Zapovednik. J Zool 276(4):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00458.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich JM, Miquelle DG, Smirnov EN, Kerley LL, Quigley HB, Hornocker MG (2010) Spatial structure of Amur ( Siberian ) tigers ( Panthera tigris altaica ) on Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Zapovednik, Russia. J Mammal 91(3):737–748. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-293.1.Key

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromyko MN (2005) Physical-geographic conditions of Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Reserve. In: Miquelle DG, Smirnov EN, Goodrich JM (eds) Tigers of Sikhote-Alin Zapovednik: ecology and conservation. PSP, Vladivostok, pp 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless ML, Walde AD, Delaney DK, Pater LL, Hayes WK (2010) Sampling considerations for improving home range estimates of desert tortoises: effects of estimator, sampling regime, and sex. Herpetol Conserv Biol 5(3):374–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward MW, O’Brien J, Kerley GIH (2007) Carrying capacity of large African predators: Predictions and tests. Biol Conserv 139(1-2):219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemker TP, Lindzey FG, Ackerman BB (1984) Population characteristics and movement patterns of cougars in Southern Utah. J Wildl Manag 48:1275. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Blanco JA, Naidenko SV, Chistopolova MD, Lukarevsky VS, Kostyrya A, Rybin A, Sorokin PA, Litvinov MN, Kotlyar AK, Miquelle DG, Rozhnov VV (2015) Social structure and space use of Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) in Southern Russian Far East based on GPS telemetry data. Integr Zool 10(4):365–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hojnowski CE, Miquelle DG, Myslenkov AI, Strindberg S, Smirnov EN, Goodrich JM (2012) Why do Amur tigers maintain exclusive home ranges? Relating ungulate seasonal movements to tiger spatial organization in the Russian Far East. J Zool 287(4):276–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00913.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2019) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biemetric J 50(3):346–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerley LL, Goodrich JM, Miquelle DG, Smirnov EN, Quigley HB, Hornocker MG (2003) Reproductive parameters of wild female Amur (Siberian) tigers (Panthera Tigris Altaica). J Mammal 84(1):288–298. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0288:rpowfa>2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lendrum PE, Elbroch LM, Quigley HB, Thompson DJ, Jimenez M, Craighead D (2014) Home range characteristics of a subordinate predator: selection for refugia or hunt opportunity? J Zool 294(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JCM, Goodrich JM (2009) Principles and practice of field anaesthesia. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maehr DS, Land ED, Roof JC, McCown JW (1989) Early maternal behavior in the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi). Am Midl Nat 122(1):34–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumder A, Basu S, Sankar K, Qureshi Q, Jhala YV, Nigam P, Gopal R (2012) Home ranges of Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris tigris L.) in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, Central India. Wildl Biol Pract 8(1):36–49. https://doi.org/10.2461/wbp.2012.8.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller CS, Hebblewhite M, Petrunenko YK, Seryodkin IV, Goodrich JM, Miquelle DG (2014) Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) energetic requirements: Implications for conserving wild tigers. Biol Conserv 170:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miquelle DG, Goodrich JM, Smirnov EN, Stephens PA, Zaumyslova OY, Chapron G, Kerley LL, Murzin AA, Hornocker MG, Quigley HB (2010) Amur tiger: a case study of living on the edge. In: Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ (eds) Biology and conservation of wild felids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 325–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Odden M, Wegge P (2005) Spacing and activity patterns of leopards Panthera pardus in the Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Wildl Biol 11(2):145–152. https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrunenko YK, Montgomery RA, Seryodkin IV, Zaumyslova OY, Miquelle DG, Macdonald DW (2016) Spatial variation in the density and vulnerability of preferred prey in the landscape shape patterns of Amur tiger habitat use. Oikos 125(1):66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01803

  • Petrunenko YK, Seryodkin IV, Bragina EV, Miquelle DG (2019) How does a tigress balance the opposing constraints of raising energy demands and protection of young cubs? Mamm Res 65(2):245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-019-00466-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QGIS Development Team (2016) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. www.qgis.osgeo.org

  • R Development Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. www.R-project.org.

  • Robinson HS, Goodrich JM, Miquelle DG, Miller CS, Seryodkin IV (2015) Mortality of Amur tigers: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Integr Zool 10(4):344–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandell M (1989) The Mating Tactics and Spacing Patterns of Solitary Carnivores. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution. Springer, Boston, pp 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4716-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K (1998) Maternal behaviour and juvenile dispersal in the Eurasian lynx. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 43:391–408. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.98-50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman DE, Powell RA (1990) Identifying patterns and intensity of home range use. Bears Their Biol Manag 8:243–249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3872925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA (1999) Effects of sample size on Kernel home range estimates. J Wildl Manag 63(2):739–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seryodkin IV, Goodrich JM, Smirnov EN, Miquelle DG, Kerley LL (2012) Natal dens of tigers in the Sikhote-Alin reserve. In: Astafiev AA, Pimenova EA, Gromyko MN, Potikha EV (eds) Sikhote-Alin Biosphere District: condition of ecosystems and their components: Volume of scientific work: for the 75-th anniversary of the Sikhote-Alin Reserve. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, pp 208–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Simcharoen A, Savini T, Gale GA, Simcharoen S, Duangchantrasiri S, Pakpien S, Smith JLD (2014) Female tiger Panthera tigris home range size and prey abundance: important metrics for management. Oryx 48(3):370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JLD, McDougal CW, Sunquist ME (1987) Female land tenure system in tigers. In: Tilson RL, Seal US (eds) Tigers of the world: the biology, biopolitics, management, and conservation of an endangered species. Noyes Publications, New Jersey, pp 97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PA, Zaumyslova OY, Miquelle DG, Myslenkov AI, Hayward GD (2006) Estimating population density from indirect sign: track counts and the Formozov-Malyshev-Pereleshin formula. Anim Conserv 9(3):339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White G, Garrott R (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic press

  • Yachmennikova AA, Rozhnov VV, Blidchenko EY, Poyarkov AD, Korenkova AA, Shteiman AA (2017) Data integration for development of the general-purpose scale of tiger cubs ontogenesis. J Gen Biol 78(4):40–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Zapovednik for their support of our research, including former Directors Anatoly Astafiev and Dmitry Gorshkov and former Deputy Directors of Science Mikhail Gromyko, Elena Pimenova, and Elena Potikha. The Siberian Tiger Project staff, particularly Nikolai Rybin, Alexander Rybin, Vladmir Melnikov, Nikolai Pukhovoy, Andre Safonov, and Evgeny Gishko, collected the majority of location data upon which this analysis was based. Funding was provided by the Liz Claiborne and Art Ortenburg Foundation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Tiger Rhino Conservation Fund, the Robertson Foundation, the Bobolink Foundation, Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund, Panthera’s Kaplan Graduate Award Program, Save the Tiger Fund, and the Wildlife Conservation Society. We thank Krzysztof Schmidt and two anonymous reviewers for greatly improving the quality of this manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Liz Claiborne and Art Ortenburg Foundation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Tiger Rhino Conservation Fund, the Robertson Foundation, the Bobolink Foundation, Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund, Panthera’s Kaplan Graduate Award Program, Save the Tiger Fund, and the Wildlife Conservation Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna V. Klevtcova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Animal welfare statement

For this study, we obtained data from 10 radio-collared wild Amur female tigers captured between February 1992 and December 2011 within the boundaries of Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Zapovednik. Tigers were captured in leg-hold snares or darted from a helicopter, anesthetized with ketamine mixed with xylazine or medetomidine (Goodrich et al. 2001), or with Zoletil (Lewis and Goodrich 2009), and fitted with standard very high frequency (VHF) radio-collars (Telonics, Mesa, AZ, USA). The leg-hold snares were checked at least once a day, and where possible, transmitters were placed on snares to activate upon capture. Animals were monitored (respiration rate, body temperature, and pulse) throughout the handling process, as body measurements were taken, blood collected, and radio-collars attached. After the procedure was completed, an animal a received reversing agent (if medetomidine was used) and released. Capture teams were commonly assisted by licensed veterinarians. No animals were transported or otherwise removed from their natural environment. Research on wild tigers followed American Society of Mammalogist Guidelines and was approved by the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Animal Care and Use Committee.

Code availability

All data analyses were performed using open source R and QGIS software, custom cods available for sharing upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Communicated by: Krzysztof Schmidt

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(PDF 1769 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klevtcova, A.V., Miquelle, D.G., Seryodkin, I.V. et al. The influence of reproductive status on home range size and spatial dynamics of female Amur tigers. Mamm Res 66, 83–94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00547-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00547-2

Keywords

Navigation