Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Behavioral responses of goitered gazelles to potential threats

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prey species have to recognize a predator, assess its potential threat, and adjust its behavioral responses according to the magnitude of the perceived predation risk. In many studies of antipredator behavior in prey animals, simulated threats, such as human activities (movements, approaching prey), have been used as experimental threat factors, often in controlled circumstances, while prey responses to other animals in natural environments have been less investigated. This paper discusses the responses of goitered gazelles in the wild during encounters with various animals in their natural habitat to evaluate their cues used to assess the magnitude of potential threats. This study found that the goitered gazelles’ behavioral responses to perceived risk differed across the various species sharing their habitat, with kulan recognized as a minimal threat and Siberian ibex the most threatening among ungulates. Among predators, the fox caused the least fear, while a horseman with a dog was identified as the greatest threat, with a wolf falling in between. Goitered gazelles adjusted their responses depending on the traits of the species encountered, while the features and conditions in their local environment played a less significant role. During encounters with other species, the gazelles ranked them according to their potential risk level based on the animal’s appearance and behavior. The gazelles did distinguish between predators and other species and reacted to them differently: from pursuing and harassing the smallest (fox), to a panicky, running escape from their most dangerous natural predator (wolf), and especially from their most lethal, non-natural “predator” (herdsmen—mainly local poachers). Thus, this study suggested that goitered gazelles differentiate between predator species, assess their traits and intentions in each particular setting, and respond in the most advantageous way to each threat challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behav 49:227–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Apfelbach R, Blanchard CD, Blanchard RJ, Hayes RA, McGregor IS (2005) The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neuroscie Behav Rev 29:1123–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Barja I, Rosellini S (2008) Does habitat type modify group size in roe deer and red deer under predation risk by Iberian wolves? Can J Zool 86:170–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekenov AB, Fadeev VA (1984) Kulan. In: Gvozdev EV, Strautman EI (eds) Mammals of Kazakhstan, Vol. 3 (4), Nauka KazSSR, Alma-Ata, pp. 189–217 (in Russian)

  • Blank DA (1985) Peculiarities of social and reproductive behaviour of Gazella subgutturosa in the Iliisky Valley. Zool Zhu 64:1059–1070 in Russian, English abstract

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank DA (1990) Persian gazelle. In: Kovshar AF (ed) Rare animals of the desert regions. Nauka Press of Kazakh SSR, Alma-Ata, pp. 56–80

  • Blank DA (2018a) The use of tail-flagging and white rump-patch in alarm behavior of goitered gazelle. Behav Process 151: 44–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blank DA (2018b) Escaping behavior in goitered gazelle. Behav Process 147: 38–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blank DA (2018c) Alarm signals in goitered gazelle with special reference to stotting, hissing, and alarm urination-defecation. Zoology 131: 29–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blank DA (2018d) Vigilance, staring and escape running in antipredator behavior of goitered gazelle. Behav Process 157: 408–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blank DA, Yang W, Xia C, Xu W (2012) Grouping pattern of the goitered gazelle, Gazella subgutturosa (Cetartiodactyla: Bovidae) in Kazakhstan. Mamm 76:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT (2008) Fourteen security lessons from antipredator behavior natural security: a Darwinian approach to a dangerous world, 147e158

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers JA (1997) American pronghorn: social adaptations and the ghost of predators past. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, II, 326 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. Chicago Press University, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, Lombardo L, Goldizen AW, Kelly M (1995) Tail-flagging and other antipredator signals in white-tailed deer: new data and synthesis. Behav Ecol 6(4):442–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamaillé-Jammes S, Malcuit H, Le Saout S, Martin JL (2014) Innate threat-sensitive foraging: black-tailed deer remain more fearful of wolf than of the less dangerous black bear even after 100 years of wolf absence. Oecologia 174(4):1151–1158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coss RG, Ramakrishnan U (2000) Perceptual aspects of leopard recognition by wild bonnet macaque (Macaca radiana). Behaviour 137:315–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman A, Richardson D, Schechter R, Blumstein DT (2008) Does habituation to humans influence predator discrimination in Gunther’s dik-diks (Madoqua guentheri)? Biol Lett 4:250–252

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Creel S, Winnie JJ, Maxwell B, Hamlin K, Creel M (2005) Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecol 86(12):3387–3397

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel S, Schuette P, Christianson D (2014) Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community. Behav Ecol 25(4):773–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosmary WG, Valeix H, Fritz H, Madzikanda H, Côte SD (2012) African ungulates and their drinking problems: hunting and predation risks constrain access to water. Anim Behav 83(1):145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehn MM (1990) Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26(5):337–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes RD, Goddard J (1967) Prey selection and hunting behaviour of the African wild dog. J Wildl Manag 31:52–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadeev VA, Sludskiy AA (1983) Saiga. In: Gvozdev EV, VI Kapitonov (eds) Mammals of Kazakhstan. Nauka of Kazakh SSR, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, pp 54–92

  • Fedosenko AK and Kapitonov VI (1983) Argali. In: Mammals of Kazakhstan (Gvozdev EV and Kapitonov VI, eds), Vol 3, part 3. Nauka of Kazakh SSR, Alma-Ata, Kazakstan: 144-209 pp.

  • Fedosenko AK and Savinov EF (1983) The Siberian ibex. In: Mammals of Kazakhstan (Gvozdev EV and Kapitonov VI, eds). Vol. 3, Part 3. Nauka of Kazkh SSR, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan: 92-143 pp.

  • Fedosenko AK, Blank DA (2001) Capra sibirica. Mamm Species 675:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzGibbon CD (1994) The costs and benefits of predator inspection behaviour in Thomson’s gazelles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzGibbon CD, Lazarus J (1995) Antipredator behavior of Serengeti ungulates: individual differences and population consequences. In: Serengeti II: Dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem 2, 274

  • Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6(1):11 online] URL: http://www.conecol.org/vol 6/iss1/art11

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist V (1981) Behavior: adaptive strategies in mule deer. In: Wallmo OC (ed) Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (NE), pp 156–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Gese EM (1998) Threat of predation: do ungulates behave aggressively towards different members of a coyote pack? Can J Zool 77:499–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie RD (1971) A new theory of mammalian rump patch evolution. Behaviour 38:132–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirth DH, McCullough DR (1977) Evolution of alarm signals in ungulate with special reference to white-tailed deer. Am Nat 111(977):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakody S, Sibbald AM, Gordon IJ, Lambin X (2008) Red deer Cervus elaphus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance. Wildl Biol 14(1):81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington M (1976) The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular reference to their causation and function as displays. Behaviour 56:69–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingswood SC, Blank DA (1996) Gazella subgutturosa. Mamm Species 518: 1–10

  • Kuijper DPJ, Verwijmeren M, Churski M, Zbyryt A, Schmidt K, Jędrzejewska B, Smith C (2014) What cues do ungulates use to assess predation risk in dense temperate forests? PLOSOne 9(1):e84607

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel KE, Pletscher DH (2000) Habitat factors affecting vulnerability of moose to predation by wolves in southeastern British Columbia. Can J Zool 78(1):150–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinders JJM (1979) On the osteology function of the digits of some ruminants and their bearing on taxonomy. Z Saugetierkunde 44:305–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent PC (1966) Calving and related social behavior in the barren-ground caribou. Z Tierpsychol 23(6):701–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liley S, Creel S (2007) What best explains vigilance in elk: characteristics of prey, predators, or the environment? Behav Ecol 19(2):245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1995) Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group size effect. Anim Behav 49:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle S, Pellis SM (2002) Fight or flight? Antipredator behavior and the escalation of coyote encounters with deer. Behav Ecol 131:154–164

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RA, Geist V, Johnston RH (1982) Cardiac and behavioral responses of mountain sheep to human disturbance. J Wildl Manag 46:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Dodson SI (1980) Do stonefly predators influence benthic distributions in streams? Ecol 61:1275–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Périquet S, Todd-Jones L, Valeix M, Stapelkamp B, Elliot N, Wijers M, Pays O, Fortin D, Madziknda H, Fritz H, Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ (2012) Influence of immediate predation risk by lions on the vigilance of prey of different body size. Behav Ecol 23(5):970–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce BM, Bowyer RT, Bleich VC (2004) Habitat selection by mule deer: forage benefits or risk of predation? J Wildl Manag 68(3):533–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G (1996) Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav 51:1077–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Sludskiy AA (1962) Interactions of predators and prey. Proc Inst Zool 42:24–143 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomatin AO (1973) Kulan, Nauka Press, Moscow

  • Stankowich T, Blumstein D (2005) Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272(1581):2627–2634

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankowich T, Coss RG (2006) Effect of predator behavior and proximity on risk assessment by Columbian black-tailed deer. Behav Ecol 17:246–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankowich T, Coss RG (2007) The re-emergence of felid camouflage with the decay of predator recognition in deer under relaxed selection. Proc Biol Sci 274(1607):175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walther FR (1969) Flight behaviour and avoidance of predators in Thomson’s gazelle (Gazella thomsoni Guenther 1884). Behav 34(3):184–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Welp T, Rushen J, Kramer DL, Festa-Bianchet M, de Passille AMB (2004) Vigilance as a measure of fear in dairy cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 87:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahner RH (2012) Communication. In: Wildlife and conservation. Springer, New York, NY, pp 101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior 16:229–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhevnerov VV and Bekenov AB (1983) Goitered gazelle. In: Mammals of Kazakhstan (Gvozdev EV and Kapitonov VI, eds), Vol 3, part 3. Nauka of Kazakh SSR, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan: 11–54 pp.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) for The Strategic Priority Research Program (XDA20020101) for granting our work and creating all conditions for writing this paper. I am very grateful to the Institute of Zoology, former Academy of Sciences of Kazakhstan, which has given me the possibility to study goitered gazelles in their natural environment for 10 years. I am grateful to Ms. Patricia Johnston for her useful suggestions and remarks and constant help in the English editing of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

    D. A. Blank

  2. Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresources in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China

    D. A. Blank

  3. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

    D. A. Blank

Authors
  1. D. A. Blank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Blank.

Additional information

Communicated by: Teresa Abaigar Ancín

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blank, D.A. Behavioral responses of goitered gazelles to potential threats. Mamm Res 65, 141–149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-019-00457-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-019-00457-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation