Abstract
A neonicotinoid-resistant Aphis gossypii Glover population was first detected from cucumber and sweet pepper crops in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, in April 2012. In this study, we determined the insecticide susceptibility of five field-collected populations of A. gossypii to seven neonicotinoids. Insecticide susceptibility was determined by performing bioassays and using the seedling-treatment method. Insecticide susceptibility of a susceptible population of A. gossypii, originally collected from a cucumber field in 2008, was also determined. High mortality (96.4–100 %) was observed in the susceptible population for the seven insecticides. In contrast, the mortality rate of the five field-collected populations collected in 2012 was low for five of the seven neonicotinoid insecticides tested: imidacloprid (26.7–65.5 %), dinotefuran (0–27.3 %), clothianidin (20.0–35.7 %), thiamethoxam (7.1–42.3 %), and nitenpyram (6.7–32.1 %). Mortality was 86.2–100 % for acetamiprid and 90.2–100 % for thiacloprid. The resistance ratio in comparison with the susceptible population was the highest for clothianidin (687-fold), lowest for thiacloprid (17-fold), and ranged from 43- to 253-fold for the other five neonicotinoids. Thus, the frequency of insecticide use needs to be reduced and other insecticides need to be employed in order to prevent the development of resistance to these two insecticides in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267
Bass C, Puinean AM, Andrews M, Culter P, Daniels M, Elias J, Paul VL, Crossthwaite AJ, Denholm L, Field LM, Foster SP, Lind R, Williamson MS, Slater R (2011) Mutation of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor β subunit is associated with resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in the aphid Myzus persicae. BMC Neurosci 12:51
Bliss CI (1935) The calculation of the dosage–mortality curve. Ann Appl Biol 22:134–167
Ebert T, Cartwright B (1997) Biology and ecology of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Southwest Entomol 22:116–153
Foster SP, Cox D, Oliphant L, Mitchinson S, Denholm I (2008) Correlated responses to neonicotinoid insecticides in clones of the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pest Manag Sci 64:1111–1114
Hama K (1987) Insecticide resistance in aphids. Plant Prot 41:15–20 (in Japanese)
Herron GA, Wilson LJ (2011) Neonicotinoid resistance in Aphis gossypii Glover (Aphididae: Hemiptera) from Australian cotton. Aust J Entomol 50:93–98
Inaizumi M (1981) Life cycle of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera, Aphididae) with special reference to biotype differentiation on various host plants. Kontyû 49:219–240 (in Japanese)
Komi K (2003) Decreased susceptibility of Thrips palmi Karny to neonicotinoide insecticides. Shikoku PL Prot Res 36:53–56 (in Japanese)
PoloPlus (2003) Probit and logit analysis. User’s guide, version 2.0. LeOra Software Company, Petaluma
Saito T (1990) Insecticide resistance of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). III. Occurrence of pyrethroids resistant populations. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 34:174–176 (in Japanese with English summary). doi:10.1303/jjaez.34.309
Saito T (1991) Insecticide resistance of the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). V. Relationship between host preference and organophosphorus resistance. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 35:145–152 (in Japanese with English summary). doi:10.1303/jjaez.35.145
Shi XB, Jiang LL, Wang HY, Qiao K, Wang D, Wang KY (2011) Toxicities and sublethal effects of seven neonicotinoid insecticides on survival, growth and reproduction of imidacloprid-resistant cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii. Pest Manag Sci 67:1528–1533. doi:10.1002/ps.2207
Shi XG, Zhu YK, Xia XM, Qiao K, Wang HY, Wang D, Wang KY (2012) The mutation in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor β1 subunit may confer resistance to imidacloprid in Aphis gossypii (Glover). J Food Agric Environ 10:1227–1230
Slater R, Paul VL, Andrews M, Garbay M, Camblin P (2012) Identifying the presence of neonicotinoid resistant peach-potato aphid (Myzus persicae) in the peach-growing regions of southern France and northern Spain. Pest Manag Sci 68:634–638
Sone S, Yamada Y, Tsuboi S (1995) New pesticide screening method for leaf hoppers and plant hoppers using rice seedlings. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 39:171–173 (in Japanese with English summary). doi:10.1303/jjaez.39.171
Sone S, Maki T, Iwaya K, Otsu Y (1998) New pesticide bioassay method for Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) using cucumber seedlings. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 42:215–220 (in Japanese with English summary). doi:10.1303/jjaez.42.215
Taniguchi T (1987) Present situation of chemical control on the aphids of vegetable crops. Plant Prot 41:165–169 (in Japanese)
Tokumaru S, Hayashida Y (2010) Pesticide susceptibility of Q-biotype Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 54:13–21 (in Japanese with English summary). doi:10.1303/jjaez.2010.13
Tsuchizaki T, Tochihara H, Kameya M, Yanase H (1993) Plant virus diseases in Japan. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Umeya K, Okada T (2003) Agricultural insect pests in Japan. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Wang KY, Guo QL, Xia XM, Wang HY, Liu TX (2007) Resistance of Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae) to selected insecticides on cotton from five cotton production regions in Shandong, China. J Pestic Sci 32:372–378. doi:10.1584/jpestics.G06-51
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Masaya Matsumura of Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center, NARO, and Dr. Atsushi Yamamoto of Nippon Soda Co., Ltd., for their valuable comments on the manuscript. We also thank the staff of Miyazaki Agricultural Research Institute for their kind help with the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuura, A., Nakamura, M. Development of neonicotinoid resistance in the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Japan. Appl Entomol Zool 49, 535–540 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-014-0289-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-014-0289-4