Skip to main content
Log in

Toward effective structural identification of medium-rise building structures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structural Identification (St-Id) is the process of constructing and calibrating a physics-based model based on the measured static and/or dynamic response of the structure. Over the last two decades, although the St-Id methods have become increasingly popular amongst civil–structural engineering communities, most complete and successful applications are often found with flexible structures such as long-span bridges and towers. Very few comprehensive studies were reported on building structures, especially those with medium-rise characteristics which are often associated with complicated analytical modelling and different degrees of parameter uncertainties. To address this need, this paper presents an in-depth study on St-Id of a benchmark medium-rise building firstly demonstrating the importance of developing appropriate initial analytical models that can be used for the automated model calibration techniques. Then, a novel parametric study-based sensitivity analysis approach is introduced to identify tuning parameters as well as their appropriate ranges to maximise the correlation of the calibrated model whilst preserving the physical relevance of the calibrated model. Modal data of the first few modes measured under ambient vibration conditions are used in this study. Further application of the St-Id process developed herein for structural health monitoring (SHM) of buildings is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aktan AE, Brownjohn JMW (2013) Structural identification: opportunities and challenges. J Struct Eng (United States) 139(10):1639–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aktan E et al (1998) Structural identification: analytical aspects. J struct eng. 124(7):817–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Catbas FN et al (2007) Limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures. J Struct Eng 133(8):1051–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck JL, Jennings PC (1980) Structural identification using linear models and earthquake records. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 8(2):145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hudson DE (1977) Dynamic tests of full-scale structures. 103(6):1141–1157

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yao JTP (1979) Damage assessment and reliability evaluation of existing structures. Eng Struct 1(5):245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aktan AE et al (1997) Structural identification for condition assessment: experimental arts. J struct eng 123(12):1674–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aoki T, Sabia D (2005) Structural identification and seismic performance of brick chimneys, Tokoname. Jpn Struct Eng Mech 21(5):553–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonato P, Ceravolo R, De Stefano A (1998) The use of wind excitation in structural identification. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 74–76:709–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan THT et al (2009) Concurrent multi-scale modeling of civil infrastructures for analyses on structural deteriorating-Part II: model updating and verification. Finite Elem Anal Des 45(11):795–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu H, Yang Z, Gaulke MS (2005) Structural identification and finite element modeling of a 14-story office building using recorded data. Eng Struct 27(3):463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaishi B, Ren W-X (2005) Structural finite element model updating using ambient vibration test results. J Struct Eng 131(4):617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zivanovic S, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2007) Finite element modelling and updating of a lively footbridge: the complete process. J Sound Vib 301(1–2):126–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brownjohn JMW, Xia P-Q (2000) Dynamic assessment of curved cable-stayed bridge by model updating. J struct eng. 126(2):252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang QW, Chang TYP, Chang CC (2001) Finite-element model updating for the Kap Shui Mun cable-stayed bridge. J Bridge Eng 6(4):285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cismasiu C, Narciso AC, Amarante Dos Santos FP (2015) Experimental dynamic characterization and finite-element updating of a footbridge structure. J Perform Constr Facil 29(4):04014116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniell WE, Macdonald JHG (2007) Improved finite element modelling of a cable-stayed bridge through systematic manual tuning. Eng Struct 29(3):358–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding Y, Li A (2008) Finite element model updating for the Runyang Cable-stayed Bridge tower using ambient vibration test results. Adv Struct Eng 11(3):323–335

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Fei QG et al (2007) Structural health monitoring oriented finite element model of Tsing Ma bridge tower. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 7(4):647–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu JR, Li QS (2004) Finite element model updating for a high-rise structure based on ambient vibration measurements. Eng Struct 26(7):979–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ventura C et al (2005) FEM updating of tall buildings using ambient vibration data. In: Proceedings of the sixth European conference on structural dynamics (EURODYN)

  22. Green Building Council Australia (2011) QUT Science and Engineering Centre: 5 Star Green Star Rating—Green Star—Education Design v1. http://www.gbca.org.au/project-profile.asp?projectID=944. Accessed July 2017

  23. Nguyen T et al (2015) Development of a cost-effective and flexible vibration DAQ system for long-term continuous structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 64–65:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen T (2014) SHM through flexible vibration sensing technologies and robust safety evaluation paradigm, PhD Thesis by Publication, Queensland University of Technology

  25. Nguyen T, Chan THT, Thambiratnam DP (2014) Field validation of controlled Monte Carlo data generation for statistical damage identification employing Mahalanobis squared distance. Struct Health Monit 13(4):473–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dynamic design solutions (2015) FEMtools Model Updating User’s Guide (Version 3.8), Dynamic Design Solutions NV (DDS), Leuven, Belgium

  27. Friswell MI (1851) Damage identification using inverse methods. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 2007(365):393–410

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen T, Chan THT, Thambiratnam DP (2014) Controlled Monte Carlo data generation for statistical damage identification employing Mahalanobis squared distance. Struct Health Monit 13(4):461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data used in this research are from the PhD research of the second author between 2014 and 2017 at QUT. The study was funded by Queensland University of Technology PhD Scholarships and in part by the Australian Research Council Discovery Project No. DP160101764.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, A., Kodikara, K.A.T.L., Chan, T.H.T. et al. Toward effective structural identification of medium-rise building structures. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8, 63–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0259-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0259-y

Keywords

Navigation