Skip to main content
Log in

Time–frequency and wavelet-based study of an old steel truss bridge before and after retrofitting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Signal-processing techniques have been widely used in structural health monitoring and nondestructive evaluation. Wavelet analysis, a relatively new mathematical and signal-processing tool, for damage detection in various civil and mechanical structures. It is a time–frequency analysis that provides more detailed information about nonstationary signals which traditional Fourier analysis miss. This paper aims to provide the damage identification in an existing 100-year-old deck-type steel truss bridge using-frequency- and time–frequency-based approaches. The dynamic testing of steel bridge was carried out using accelerometers for the damaged state and after partial retrofitting under similar environmental conditions and instrumental set up. The comparison is carried out using power spectral density, short-time Fourier transform, and wavelet packet transform with respect to both the upstream and the downstream trusses of the bridge. Higher and uniform dissipation of energy at resonating-frequency of the respective node after retrofitting showed intactness of joints. The variations of power spectral density in the first mode of the upstream and the downstream trusses clearly revealed improvements in the bridge signifying the importance of generating a signature of bridge before and after retrofitting. The status upgradations for the upstream and the downstream trusses obtained were different due to differential levels of damage in the bridge. Also, after retrofitting, the structural elemental behavior obtained was not the same as desired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  1. Moyo P, Brownjohn J (2001), Bridge health monitoring using wavelet analysis. Proceedings of SPIE 4317, 2nd International Conference on Experimental Mechanics. doi:10.1117/12.429636

  2. Fatemi AA, Beigi MHA (2011) Steel bridges retrofitting techniques. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4(6):695–698

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dong Y, Song R, Liu H (2010) Bridges structural health monitoring and deterioration detection-synthesis of knowledge and technology final report. Fairbanks, Report No. AK INE/AUTC #10.06

  4. Graybeal B, Phares B (2002) Visual inspection of highway bridges. J Nondestruct Eval 21(3):67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frýba L, Pirner M (2001) Load tests and modal analysis of bridges. Eng Struct 23:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xia Y, Chen B, Weng S, Ni YQ, Xu YL (2012) Temperature effect on vibration properties of civil structures: a literature review and case studies. J Civ Struct Health Monit 2(1):29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao Z, Chen X (2011) Structure data processing and damage identification based on wavelet and artificial neural network res. J Appl Sci Eng Technol 3(10):1203–1208

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walia S, Patel R, Vinayak H, Parti R (2013) Joint discrepancy evaluation of an existing steel bridge using time-frequency and wavelet-based approach Int. J Adv Struct Engl 5(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim H, Melhem H (2004) Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis. Eng Struct 26(3):347–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hester D, González A (2012) A wavelet-based damage detection algorithm based on bridge acceleration response to a vehicle. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:145–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fei C, Wan-Cheng Y, Jia-Jun S (2000) Damage detection of structures based on static response. J Tongji Univ Nat Sci 28:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhen HX, Li D-L, Hua ZF (2002) A summary review of structural initial damage identification methods. J Vib Shock 21:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang YQ, Ding BS, Ni HJ (2000) Influence of modeling errors on input vectors to neural networks for damage identification China. Civ Eng J 33:50–55

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gu P (2010) A new signal processing method based on intrinsic frequency. Struct Congr 12(15):179–200

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qiao L (2009) Structural damage detection using signal-based pattern recognition. Dissertation Kansas State University

  16. Yu L, Giurgiutiu V (2005) Advanced signal processing for enhanced damage detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Smart Struct Syst 1(2):185–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim CY, Jung DS, Kim NS, Kwon SD, Feng MQ (2003) Effect of vehicle weight on natural frequencies of bridges measured from traffic-induced vibration. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2(1):109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Staszewski WJ, Robertson AN (2007) Time-frequency and time-scale analyses for structural health monitoring. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:449–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamtaei MR, Anvar SA, Farrokhrooz M (2008) Application of time-frequency transform techniques for estimation of natural frequencies of MDOF Systems International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation, Jakarta, April 14–15, pp. 690–729

  20. Lardies J, Gouttebroze S (2002) Identification of modal parameters using the wavelet transform. Int J Mech Sci 44(11):2263–2283

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Law SS, Li XY, Zhu XQ, Chan SL (2005) Structural damage detection from wavelet packet sensitivity. Eng Struct 27(9):1339–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. The Constructional Department (1906) Pocket Companion containing important information and Tables pertaining to use of steel. Pocket Companion Dorman, Long & Co. Ltd Middlesbrough, England

  23. Spyrakos CC, Raftoyiannis IG, Ermopoulos JC (2004) Condition assessment and retrofit of a historic steel-truss railway bridge. J Constr Steel Res 60:1213–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. SAP2000 (2006) Structural analysis program 10.0.5. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley. http://www.csiberkeley.com

  25. Walia SK, Vinayak HK, Kumar A, Parti R (2012) Nodal disparity in opposite trusses of a steel bridge: a case study. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 2(3–4):175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. MATLAB(2006) User manual version 7.2 The math works, Inc. Natick, MA

  27. Banerji RP, Chikermane S (2011) Condition assessment of a heritage arch bridge using a novel model updation technique. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 2(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. IRC:6 (2000) Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges section-II load and stresses. New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  29. IRC:21 (2000) Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges section-III cement concrete (Plain and Reinforced) New Delhi, India

  30. Subramanian N (2012) Steel structures design and practice. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  31. Anton SR (2008) Baseline-free and self-powered structural health monitoring by baseline-free and self-powered structural health monitoring. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

  32. Gupta HR (2013) Power spectrum estimation using Welch method for various windows. Techniques 2(6):389–392

    Google Scholar 

  33. Figueiredo E, Park G, Figueiras J, Farrar C, Worden K (2009) Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets. Technical Information Center Oak Ridge Tennessee, Report No 1002

  34. Seker S, Ayaz E (2003) Feature extraction related to bearing damage in electric motors by wavelet analysis. J Franklin Inst 340(2):125–134

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Chendeb M, Khalil M, Duchêne J (2006) Signal methodology of wavelet packet selection for event detection. Signal Proc Special Sect 86(12):3826–3841

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Koohdaragh M (2011) Examining the function of wavelet packet transform (WPT) and continues wavelet transform (CWT) in recognizing the crack specification KSCE. J Civ Eng 5(3):497–506

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Himachal Pradesh Public Works Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, India for allowing thee National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur to conduct the experiment on the steel truss bridge in the state. The authors also thank Kaptl instrumentation for providing necessary instrumentation for conducting the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Kumar Walia.

Additional information

This research was carried out at the National Institute of Technology Hamirpur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walia, S.K., Patel, R.K., Vinayak, H.K. et al. Time–frequency and wavelet-based study of an old steel truss bridge before and after retrofitting. J Civil Struct Health Monit 5, 397–414 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0116-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0116-9

Keywords

Navigation