Skip to main content
Log in

Model calibration in the presence of resonant non-structural elements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate finite element models are needed in many applications of Civil Engineering. Non-structural elements (NSEs) often interfere with the main structure, altering its stiffness and modal signature. Neglecting such interaction, although a common practice in design, may lead to unreliable predictions of the structural dynamic response and to biased interpretations of experimental vibrational tests. In the literature, the role of NSEs in vibration-based finite element model calibration is well documented for NSEs working “in parallel” with the main structure (e.g. masonry infills in buildings, pavements or railings in bridges) but remains essentially unexplored for NSEs working “in series” with the main structure (e.g. non-structural appendages like suspended ceilings, piping systems, storage tanks and antennas, but also partitions and façades in their out-of-plane modes). Through the analysis of numerical and experimental case studies, this paper shows that “in series” NSEs accidentally resonating with some structural mode may deeply contaminate the overall modal behaviour and severely invalidate model calibration, unless their role is properly addressed while performing experimental modal analysis and structural modelling. Two alternative calibration strategies are finally discussed which prove effective in the presence of resonant NSEs, based on, respectively, excluding/including the NSEs from/into the model structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element model updating in structural dynamics. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Saitta A, Raphael B, Smith IFC (2005) Data mining techniques for improving the reliability of system identification. Adv Eng Inform 19:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eamon CD, Nowak AS (2004) Effect of secondary elements on bridge structural system reliability considering moment capacity. Struct Saf 26:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marefat M-S, Ghahremani-Gargary E, Ataei S (2004) Load test of a plain concrete arch railway bridge of 20-m span. Constr Build Mater 18:661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mastrogiuseppe S, Rogers CA, Tremblay R, Nedisan CD (2008) Influence of nonstructural components on roof diaphragm stiffness and fundamental periods of single-storey steel buildings. J Constr Steel Res 64:214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fardis MN (1997) Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of RC infilled frames and recommendations for code provisions. Report ECOEST-PREC8 no. 6. Prenormative research in support of Eurocode 8

  7. Kim JY, Yu E, Kim DY, Kim S-D (2009) Calibration of analytical models to assess wind-induced acceleration responses of tall buildings in serviceability level. Eng Struct 31:2086–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goulet J-A, Kripakaran P, Smith IFC (2009) Estimation of modelling errors in structural system identification. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure, Zurich

  9. Turer A, Shahrooz BM (2011) Load rating of concrete-deck-on-steel-stringer bridges using field-calibrated 2D-grid models. Eng Struct 33:1267–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brownjohn JMW, Dumanoglu AA, Taylor CA (1994) Dynamic investigation of a suspension footbridge. Eng Struct 16:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zivanovic A, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2006) Modal testing and FE model tuning of a lively footbridge structure. Eng Struct 28:857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schubert S, Gsell D, Steiger R, Feltrin G (2010) Influence of asphalt pavement on damping ratio and resonance frequencies of timber bridges. Eng Struct 32:3122–3129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Su RKL, Chandler AM, Sheikh MN, Lam NTK (2005) Influence of non-structural components on lateral stiffness of tall buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 14(2):143–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torkamani MAM, Armadi AK (1998) Stiffness identification of a tall building during construction period using ambient tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16(8):1177–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boroschek RL, Baesler H, Vega C (2011) Experimental evaluation of the dynamic properties of a wharf structure. Eng Struct 33:344–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones CA, Reynolds P, Pavic A (2011) Vibration serviceability of stadia structures subjected to dynamic crowd loads: a literature review. J Sound Vib 330:1531–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Soong TT (1988) State-of-the-art review: seismic response of secondary systems. Eng Struct 10(4):218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Villaverde R (2004) Seismic analysis and design of nonstructural elements. In: Bozorgnia Bertero (ed) Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soong TT (1990) Seismic performance of nonstructural elements during the Loma Prieta earthquake. Report NIST SP 796, 22nd joint meeting US–Japan cooperative program in natural resources panel on wind and seismic effects, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp 331–336

  20. Whitney DJ, Dickerson A, Lindell MK (2001) Nonstructural seismic preparedness of Southern California hospitals. Earthq Spectra 17(1):153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaudhuri SR, Hutchinson TC (2004) Distribution of peak horizontal acceleration for estimating nonstructural element vulnerability. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, paper 1721

  22. Lam NTK, Griffith M, Wilson J, Doherty K (2003) Time-history analysis of URM walls in out-of-plane flexure. Eng Struct 25:743–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muscolino G (1990) Dynamic response of multiply connected primary-secondary systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eurocode 8 (2004) Design for structures for earthquakes resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1

  25. Singh MP, Moreschi LM, Suárez LE, Matheu EE (2006) Seismic design forces. I: rigid nonstructural components. J Struct Eng 132(10):1524–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta AK (1984) Seismic response of multiply connected MDOF primary and MDOF secondary systems. Nucl Eng Des 81(3):385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Igusa T, Der Kiureghian A (1985) Generation of floor response spectra including oscillator-structure interaction. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13:661–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Burdisso RA, Singh MP (1987) Seismic analysis of multiply supported secondary systems with dynamic interaction effects. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 15:1005–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Muscolino G, Palmeri A (2007) An earthquake response spectrum for linear light secondary substructures. ISET J Earthq Technol 482(44):193–211

    Google Scholar 

  30. Warburton GB, Ayorinde EO (1980) Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 8:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Villaverde R, Koyama LA (1993) Damped resonant appendages to increase inherent damping in buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22:491–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abé M, Igusa T (1995) Tuned mass dampers for structures with closely spaced natural frequencies. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Matta E, De Stefano A, Spencer BF Jr (2009) A new passive rolling-pendulum vibration absorber using a non-axial-symmetrical guide to achieve bidirectional tuning. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:1729–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Matta E (2013) Effectiveness of tuned mass dampers against ground motion pulses. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 139(2):188–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nalitolela NG, Penny JET, Friswell MI (1992) A mass or stiffness addition technique for structural parameter updating. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 7(3):157–168

    Google Scholar 

  36. Juang JN, Pappa RS (1984) An eigensystem realisation algorithm (ERA) for modal parameter identification and modal reduction. In: Proceedings of NASA/JPL workshop on identification and control of flexible space structures

  37. Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2001) Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 10:441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bonato P, Ceravolo R, De Stefano A, Molinari F (2001) Use of cross time–frequency estimators for the structural identification in non-stationary conditions and under unknown excitation. J Sound Vib 237:775–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Antonacci E, De Stefano A, Gattulli V, Lepidi M, Matta E (2012) Comparative study of vibration-based parametric identification techniques for a three-dimensional frame structure. Struct Control Health 19(5):579–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Matta E, De Stefano A (2012) Robust finite element model updating of a large-scale benchmark building structure. Struct Eng Mech 43(3):371–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emiliano Matta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matta, E., De Stefano, A. Model calibration in the presence of resonant non-structural elements. J Civil Struct Health Monit 5, 37–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-014-0096-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-014-0096-1

Keywords

Navigation