Skip to main content
Log in

Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Philosophy & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wide variety of skills, abilities and knowledge are used in technological activities such as engineering design. Together, they enable problem solving and artefact creation. Gilbert Ryle’s division of knowledge into knowing how and knowing that is often referred to when discussing this technological knowledge. Ryle’s view has been questioned and criticised by those who claim that there is only one type, for instance, Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson who claim that knowing how is really a form of knowing that and Stephen Hetherington who claims that knowing that is knowing how. Neither Ryle himself nor any of his critics have discussed technological knowledge. Exposing both Ryle’s and his critics’ ideas to technological knowledge show that there are strong reasons to keep the knowing how–knowing that dichotomy in technological contexts. The main reasons are that they are justified in different ways, that Stanley’s and Williamson’s ideas have great difficulties to account for learning of technological knowing how through training, and that knowing that is susceptible to Gettier problems, which technological knowing how is not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bzdak, D. (2008). Amnesia and knowing-how. Techné, 11(1). accessed 14 December 2013. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v12n1/bzdak.html.

  • Carr, D. (1979). The logic of knowing how and ability. Mind, 88(351), 394–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M.J. (2003). The nature of technological knowledge: extending empirically informed studies into what engineers know. Techné, 6(3), 1–12. accessed 30 December 2013. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v6n3/devries.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M.J. (2005). Teaching about technology. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, R. (2000). The origins of radio. IEEE Potentials, 19(4), 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E.L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(6), 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S.O. (2013) In Skogh, I.B., & de Vries, M.J. (Eds.), What is technological knowledge? In: Technology Teachers as Researchers, (pp. 17–31). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Hetherington, S.C. (2011). How to know. United Kingdom: Wiley InterScience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ITEA (2007). Standards for technological literacy, 3rd edn. International Technology Education Association (ITEA), In 2010 the organisation was renamed International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA) Reston, VA. accessed 23 November 2013. http://www.iteea.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf.

  • Pinch, T.J., & Bijker, W.E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J.C. (2000). Thinking about technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, T. (2009). Know how to be Gettiered?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(3), 743–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintion, L., Ferraz, R., Fernandez, I. (2008). International education, qualification and certification systems in welding. Welding in the World, 52(1–2), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, J. (1958). On ‘knowing how’ and ‘knowing that’. The Philosophical Review, 67(3), 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl, G. (1997). Knowledge types in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosefeldt, T. (2004). Is knowing-how simply a case of knowing-that?. Philosophical Investigations, 27(4), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumfitt, I. (2003). Savoir faire. The Journal of Philosophy, 100(3), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1990). Knowing how and knowing that. In: Collected Essays 1929–1968, no. 2 in Collected Papers, (pp. 211–225). United Kingdom: Thoemmes Antiquarian Books Ltd. original work published 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (2000). The concept of mind. London: Penguin Books. original work published 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, P. (2004). Knowing how and knowing that: a distinction reconsidered. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, B. (2006). J.J. Thomson, the electron and the birth of electronics. World Patent Information, 28(4), 330–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. (2011). Know how. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., & Williamson, T. (2001). Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy, 98(8), 411–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thulesius, O. (2007). The man who made the monitor: A Biography of John Ericsson, Naval Engineer. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Norström.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Norström, P. Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology. Philos. Technol. 28, 553–565 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0178-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0178-3

Keywords

Navigation