Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of gentamicin sulphate-loaded PLGA nanoparticle-based film for the treatment of surgical site infection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Drug Delivery and Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study focuses on the in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the developed gentamicin sulphate (GS)-loaded poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticle (PNP)-based pullulan film (PNP-F). Sterilization being an essential pre-requisite for the dosage form was carried out using ethylene oxide. Post-sterilization, PNP-F was evaluated for mechanical properties, percentage drug loading, antimicrobial effectiveness study, test for sterility and in vitro dissolution study using Strat-M® membrane. In vitro dissolution study revealed that GS gradually released from PNP-F and the highest cumulative percentage drug release was found to be 86.76 ± 0.03% at 192 h. Wound healing assay was performed to study the effect of PNP-F over migratory potential of dermal fibroblast cells (NIH-3T3) in the presence of micro-organisms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA). PNP-F inhibited the growth of PA and SA, allowing the growth of fibroblast cells indicating its suitability for application. In vivo study of surgical site was performed by superficial incision model in Wistar rats. Measurement of in vivo incision healing confirmed faster wound healing in the incision which received PNP-F compared to marketed cream containing GS.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emori TG, Gaynes RP. An overview of nosocomial infection, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993;6:428–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mundhada AS, Tenpe S. A study of organisms causing surgical site infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility in a tertiary care government hospital. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2015;58:195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Negi V, Pal S, Juyal D, Sharma MK, Sharma N. Bacteriological profile of surgical site infections and their antibiogram: a study from resource constrained rural setting of Uttarakhand state. India J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2015;9:17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John A, Jernigan MM. Is the burden of Staphylococcus aureus among patients with surgical-site infections growing? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:457–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cantlon CA, Stemper ME, Schwan WR, Hoffman MA, Qutaishat SS. Significant pathogens isolated from surgical site infections at a community hospital in the Midwest. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:526–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson DJ, Sexton DJ, Kanafani ZA, Auten G, Kaye KS. Severe surgical site infection in community hospitals: epidemiology, key procedures, and the changing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:1047–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kondo T, Ishida Y. Molecular pathology of wound healing. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;203:93–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohamad N, Loh EYX, Fauzi MB, Ng MH, Mohd Amin MCI. In vivo evaluation of bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid wound dressing hydrogel containing keratinocytes and fibroblasts for burn wounds. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2019;9:444–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bainbridge P. Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts. J Wound Care. 2013;22:407–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scainna M. An extended cellular Potts model analyzing a wound healing assay. Comput Biol Med Elsevier. 2015;62:33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grada A, Otero-Vinas M, Prieto-Castrillo F, Obagi Z, Falanga V. Research techniques made simple: analysis of collective cell migration using the wound healing assay. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonkman JEN, Cathcart JA, Xu F, Bartolini ME, Amon JE, Stevens KM, et al. Cell adhesion & migration an introduction to the wound healing assay using live cell microscopy. Cell Adhes Migr. 2014;8:440–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Todaro GJ, Lazar GK, Green H. The initiation of cell division in a contact-inhibited mammalian cell line. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1965;66:325–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang CC, Park AY, Guan JL. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:329–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Freiesleben SH, Soelberg J, Nyberg NT, Jäger AK. Determination of the wound healing potentials of medicinal plants historically used in Ghana. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med. 2017;2017:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. About Antibiotic Resistance. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/about.html. Last accessed on Dec 19, 2019.

  17. Llor C, Bjerrum L. Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014;5:229–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh R, Jr JWL. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86:215–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dhal C, Mishra R. Formulation development and in vitro evaluation of gentamicin sulfate-loaded PLGA nanoparticles based film for the treatment of surgical site infection by Box–Behnken design. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019;45:805–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheskey PJ, Cook WG, Cable CG. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. Pharm Press. 2017:808–9.

  21. Friess W, Schlapp M. Sterilization of gentamicin containing collagen / PLGA microparticle composites. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;63:176–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramos JR, Howard RD, Pleasant RS, Moll HD, Blodgett DJ, Marnin G, et al. Elution of metronidazole and gentamicin from polymethylmethacrylate beads. Vet Surg. 2003;32:251–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vetten MA, Yah CS, Singh T, Gulumian M. Challenges facing sterilization and depyrogenation of nanoparticles : effects on structural stability and biomedical applications. Nanomedicine. 2014;10:1391–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Silindir M, Özer AY. Sterilization methods and the comparison of E-beam sterilization with gamma radiation sterilization. Fabad J Pharm Sci. 2010:43–53.

  25. Jain S, Mittal A, Jain AK, Mahajan RR, Singh D. Cyclosporin A loaded plga nanoparticle: preparation, optimization, in-vitro characterization and stability studies. Curr Nanosci. 2010;6:422–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fonte P, Soares S, Sousa F, Costa A, Seabra V, Reis S, et al. Stability study perspective of the effect of freeze-drying using cryoprotectants on the structure of insulin loaded into PLGA nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:3753–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kathpalia H, Sule B, Gupte A, Kathpalia H, Sule B, Development AG. Development and evaluation of orally disintegrating film of tramadol hydrochloride QR code for mobile users. Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci. 2013;3:27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lalani J, Rathi M, Lalan M, Misra A. Protein functionalized tramadol-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: preparation, optimization, stability and pharmacodynamic studies. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012:1–11.

  29. Singh PK, Sah P, Meher G, Joshi S, Pawar VK, Raval K, et al. Macrophage-targeted chitosan anchored PLGA nanoparticles bearing doxorubicin and amphotericin B against visceral leishmaniasis. R Soc Chem Adv. 2016;6:71705–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mishra R, Soni K, Mehta T. Mucoadhesive vaginal film of fluconazole using cross-linked chitosan and pectin: in vitro and in vivo study. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;130:1683–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dobaria NB, Badhan AC, Mashru RC. A novel itraconazole bioadhesive film for vaginal delivery: design, optimization, and physicodynamic characterization. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10:951–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Indian Pharmacopoeia. 6th. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad; 2010.

  33. Adrover A, Varani G, Paolicelli P, Petralito S, Di Muzio L, Casadei MA, et al. Experimental and modeling study of drug release from HPMC-based erodible oral thin films. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rao PR, Ramakrishna S, Diwan PV. Drug release kinetics from polymeric films containing propranolol hydrochloride for transdermal use. Pharm Dev Technol. 2000;5:465–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Haq A, Goodyear B, Ameen D, Joshi V, Michniak-Kohn B. Strat-M® synthetic membrane: permeability comparison to human cadaver skin. Int J Pharm. 2018;547:432–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sinha S, Khan S, Shukla S, Lakra AD, Kumar S, Das G, et al. Cucurbitacin B inhibits breast cancer metastasis and angiogenesis through VEGF-mediated suppression of FAK/MMP-9 signaling axis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;77:41–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McRipley RJ, Whitney RR. Characterization and quantitation of experimental surgical wound infections used to evaluate topical antibacterial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976;10:38–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, Zou A, Li W, Yao C, et al. DDSolver: an add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles. AAPS J. 2010;12:263–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Guido S, Tranquillo RT. A methodology for the systematic and quantitative study of cell contact guidance in oriented collagen gels. Correlation of fibroblast orientation and gel birefringence. J Cell Sci. 1993;105:317–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Trebaul A, Chan EK, Midwood KS. Regulation of fibroblast migration by tenascin-C. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:695–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gibson B, Wilson DJ, Feil E, Eyre-walker A, Eyre-walker A. The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild. Proc R Soc B. 2018;285:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Giffen PS, Turton J, Andrews CM, Barrett P, Clarke CJ, Fung KW, et al. Markers of experimental acute inflammation in the Wistar Han rat with particular reference to haptoglobin and C-reactive protein. Arch Toxicol. 2003;77:392–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tavares E, Maldonado R, Ojeda ML, Minano FJ. Circulating inflammatory mediators during start of fever in differential diagnosis of gram-negative and gram-positive infections in leukopenic rats. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2005;12:1085–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Padilla ND, Bleeker WK, Lubbers Y, Rigter GMM, Van Mierlo GJ, Daha MR, et al. Rat C-reactive protein activates the autologous complement system. Immunology. 2003;109:564–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. de Beer F, Baltz M, Munn E, Feinstein A, Taylor J, Bruton C, et al. Isolation and characterization of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid P component in the rat. Immunology. 1982;45:55–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India, for providing the facility to Mr. Chetan Dhal for performing the study as a part of PhD research work to be submitted to Nirma University. The authors are highly thankful to Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, for providing financial assistance and senior research fellowship to Mr. Chetan Dhal (Fellowship ID: 09/1048(008)/2018 EMR-I) during the PhD. The authors acknowledge Dr. Snehal Patel and Mr. Vishal Chavda, Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahemdabad, for their support during in vivo studies. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Manish Nivsarkar, Director, PERD Centre, Ahmedabad, for providing cell line facility and Dr. Neeta Shrivastava and Ms. Sonam Sinha, PERD Centre, Ahmedabad, for supporting cell line study. The authors are thankful to Mr. Sumer Singh, Director, Oasis Test House, Ahmedabad, for supporting test for sterility. The authors also thank Evonik, Germany, and Jawa Pharmaceuticals, Gurgaon, India, for providing gift samples of PLGA and GS, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chetan Dhal.

Ethics declarations

Experiments comply with current laws of the country.

Animal studies

All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhal, C., Mishra, R. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of gentamicin sulphate-loaded PLGA nanoparticle-based film for the treatment of surgical site infection. Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res. 10, 1032–1043 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00730-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00730-7

Keywords

Navigation