Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coupling in vitro cell culture with synchrotron SAXS to understand the bio-interaction of lipid-based liquid crystalline nanoparticles with vascular endothelial cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Drug Delivery and Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlamellar lipid-based liquid crystalline (LLC) nanoparticles possessing different internal nanostructures, specifically the 3D-ordered cubosomes (V2 phase) and the 2D-ordered hexosomes (H2 phase), are of increasing interest as drug delivery systems. To facilitate their development, it is important that we understand their interactions with healthy human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). To this end, a 3D cells-in-a-tube model that recapitulates the basic morphology (i.e. tubular lumen) and in vivo microenvironment (i.e. physiological shear stress) of blood vessels was employed as a biomimetic testing platform, and the bio-nanoparticle interactions were compared with that of the conventional 2D planar cell culture. Confocal microscopy imaging revealed internalisation of the nanoparticles into HUVECs within 2 h and that the nanoparticle-cell interactions of cubosomes and hexosomes were not significantly different from one another. Low fluid shear stress conditions (i.e. venous simulation at 0.8 dynes/cm2) were shown to impose subtle effects on the degree of nanoparticle-cell interactions as compared with the static 2D culture. The unexpected similarity of cellular interactions between cubosomes and hexosomes was clarified via a real-time phase behaviour analysis using the synchrotron-based small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) technique. When the nanoparticles came into contact with HUVECs under circulating conditions, the cubosomes gradually evolved into hexosomes (within 16 min). In contrast, the hexosomes retained their original internal structure with minimal changes to the lattice parameters. This study highlights the need to couple cellular studies with high-resolution analytics such as time-resolved SAXS analysis to ensure that particle structures are verified in situ, enabling accurate interpretation of the dynamics of cellular interactions and potential bio-induced changes of particles intended for biomedical applications.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chow EKH, Ho D. Cancer nanomedicine: from drug delivery to imaging. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:216.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fong WK, Negrini R, Vallooran JJ, Mezzenga R, Boyd BJ. Responsive self-assembled nanostructured lipid systems for drug delivery and diagnostics. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;484:320–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruenraroengsak P, Cook JM, Florence AT. Nanosystem drug targeting: facing up to complex realities. J Control Release. 2010;141(3):265–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Medina-Reyes EI, García-Viacobo D, Carrero-Martínez FA, Chirino YI. Applications and risks of nanomaterials used in regenerative medicine, delivery systems, theranostics, and therapy. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2017;34:35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd BJ, Dong YD, Rades T. Nonlamellar liquid crystalline nanostructured particles: advances in materials and structure determination. J Liposome Res. 2009;19:12–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van't Hag L, Gras SL, Conn CE, Drummond CJ. Lyotropic liquid crystal engineering moving beyond binary compositional space-ordered nanostructured amphiphile self-assembly materials by design. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:2705–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Ma P, Gui S. Cubic and hexagonal liquid crystals as drug delivery systems. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:815981.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fong WK, Hanley TL, Thierry B, Tilley A, Kirby N, Waddington LJ, et al. Understanding the photothermal heating effect in non-lamellar liquid crystalline systems, and the design of new mixed lipid systems for photothermal on-demand drug delivery. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:24936–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Riedinger A, Guardia P, Curcio A, Garcia MA, Cingolani R, Manna L, et al. Subnanometer local temperature probing and remotely controlled drug release based on azo-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2013;13:2399–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gessner A, Waicz R, Lieske A, Pauke BR, Mader K, Muller RH. Nanoparticles with decreasing surface hydrophobicities: influence on plasma protein adsorption. Int J Pharm. 2000;196:245–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong YD, Larson I, Hanley T, Boyd BJ. Bulk and dispersed aqueous phase behavior of phytantriol: effect of vitamin E acetate and F127 polymer on liquid crystal nanostructure. Langmuir. 2006;22:9512–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabliov CM, Chen H, Yada RY. Nanotechnology and functional foods: effective delivery of bioactive ingredients: Wiley Blackwell; 2015.

  13. Godoy-Gallardo M, Ek PK, Jansman MMT, Wohl BM, Hosta-Rigau L. Interaction between drug delivery vehicles and cells under the effect of shear stress. Biomicrofluidics. 2015;9:052605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerzoni LPB, Nicolas V, Angelova A. In vitro modulation of TrkB receptor signaling upon sequential delivery of curcumin-DHA loaded carriers towards promoting neuronal survival. Pharm Res. 2017;34:492–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rakotoarisoa M, Angelov B, Garamus VM, Angelova A. Curcumin- and fish oil-loaded spongosome and cubosome nanoparticles with neuroprotective potential against H2O2-induced oxidative stress in differentiated human SH-SY5Y cells. ACS Omega. 2019;4:3061–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feliu N, Sun X, Alvarez Puebla RA, Parak WJ. Quantitative particle-cell interaction: some basic physicochemical pitfalls. Langmuir. 2017;33:6639–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Woo K, Dutta AK, Patel V, Kresge C, Feranchak AP. Fluid flow induces mechanosensitive ATP release, calcium signalling and Cl-transport in biliary epithelial cells through a PKCζ-dependent pathway. J Physiol. 2008;586:2779–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta R, Truong L, Bear D, Chafik D, Modafferi E, Hung CT. Shear stress alters the expression of myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and myelin basic protein (MBP) in Schwann cells. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1232–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anton D, Burckel H, Josset E, Noel G. Three-dimensional cell culture: a breakthrough in vivo. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:5517–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber D, Torger B, Richter K, Nessling M, Momburg F, Woltmann B, et al. Interaction of poly(L-lysine)/polysaccharide complex nanoparticles with human vascular endothelial cells. Nanomaterials. 2018;8.

  21. Voigt J, Christensen J, Shastri VP. Differential uptake of nanoparticles by endothelial cells through polyelectrolytes with affinity for caveolae. P Natl A Sci USA. 2014;111:2942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirby NM, Mudie ST, Hawley AM, Cookson DJ, Mertens HDT, Cowieson N, et al. A low-background-intensity focusing small-angle X-ray scattering undulator beamline. J Appl Crystallogr. 2013;46:1670–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan A, Lam YY, Pacot O, Hawley A, Boyd BJ. Probing cell-nanoparticle (cubosome) interactions at the endothelial interface: do tissue dimension and flow matter? Biomater Sci. 2019;7:3460–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan A, Fujisawa K, Yukawa Y, Matsunaga YT. Bottom-up fabrication of artery-mimicking tubular co-cultures in collagen-based microchannel scaffolds. Biomater Sci. 2016;4:1503–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mezzenga R, Meyer C, Servais C, Romoscanu AI, Sagalowicz L, Hayward RC. Shear rheology of lyotropic liquid crystals: a case study. Langmuir. 2005;21:3322–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fong C, Weerawardena A, Sagnella SM, Mulet X, Waddington L, Krodkiewska I, et al. Monodisperse nonionic phytanyl ethylene oxide surfactants: high throughput lyotropic liquid crystalline phase determination and the formation of liposomes, hexosomes and cubosomes. Soft Matter. 2010;6:4727–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Angelov B, Garamus VM, Drechsler M, Angelova A. Structural analysis of nanoparticulate carriers for encapsulation of macromolecular drugs. J Mol Liq. 2017;235:83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Angelova A, Drechsler M, Garamus VM, Angelov B. Pep-lipid cubosomes and vesicles compartmentalized by micelles from self-assembly of multiple neuroprotective building blocks including a large peptide hormone PACAP-DHA. ChemNanoMat. 2019;5:1381–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang S, Gao H, Bao G. Physical principles of nanoparticle cellular endocytosis. ACS Nano. 2015;9:8655–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mat Azmi ID, Wu L, Wibroe PP, Nilsson C, Østergaard J, Stürup S, et al. Modulatory effect of human plasma on the internal nanostructure and size characteristics of liquid-crystalline nanocarriers. Langmuir. 2015;31:5042–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hinton TM, Grusche F, Acharya D, Shukla R, Bansal V, Waddington LJ, et al. Bicontinuous cubic phase nanoparticle lipid chemistry affects toxicity in cultured cells. Toxicol Res. 2014;3:11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tran N, Mulet X, Hawley AM, Hinton TM, Mudie ST, Muir BW, et al. Nanostructure and cytotoxicity of self-assembled monoolein-capric acid lyotropic liquid crystalline nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2015;5:26785–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan A, Hong L, Du JD, Boyd BJ. Self-assembled nanostructured lipid systems: is there a link between structure and cytotoxicity? Adv Sci. 2019;6:1801223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mr. Cameron J. Nowell assisted the confocal microscopy imaging and analysis at the imaging, FACS, and Analysis Core, Monash University. The cryo-TEM images were taken at the Bio21 Institute with the assistance of Ms. Xiaohan Sun (Monash PhD candidate). The SAXS experiments were undertaken on the SAXS/WAXS beamline at the ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, Victoria.

Funding

This project is funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology. B.J.B. was the recipient of an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship. Y.Y.L. was supported by a Monash University Jubilee Honours Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Angel Tan or Ben J. Boyd.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 318 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lam, Y.Y., Hawley, A., Tan, A. et al. Coupling in vitro cell culture with synchrotron SAXS to understand the bio-interaction of lipid-based liquid crystalline nanoparticles with vascular endothelial cells. Drug Deliv. and Transl. Res. 10, 610–620 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00718-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-00718-3

Keywords

Navigation