Abstract
Based on the elastic-plastic, large-deformation finite element method, burst capacity of steel pipeline with longitudinal corrosion defect subjected to internal pressure is studied. The appropriate stress-based criterion is used to predict the failure pressure of finite element model of corroded pipeline under internal pressure. By considering the pipe steel grades and geometries of corrosion defects, a series of finite element analyses is conducted. The effects of corrosion depth, length and width on burst capacity are also discussed. A specific failure pressure solution for the assessment of corrosion defects in moderate-to-high strength pipeline is proposed on the base of numerical results. The failure pressures predicted by the proposed method are in better agreement with the experimental results than the results by the other methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABAQUS 6.9-EF1, 2009. ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual, Simulia.
Advantica, 2008. Corrosion Assessment Guidance for High Strength Steels (Phase1), Advantica.
Andrade, E. Q. and Benjamin, A. C., 2004. Structural evaluation of corrosion defects in pipelines: Comparison of FEanalyses and assessment methods, Proceedings of the 14th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Toulon, France, 120–127.
Andrade, E. Q., Benjamin, A. C., Machado, Jr P. R. S., Pereira, L. C., Jacob, B. P., Carneiro, E. G., Guerreiro, J. N. C., Silva, R. C. C. and Noronha, Jr D. B., 2006. Finite element modeling of the failure behavior of pipelines containing interacting corrosion defects, Proceedings of OMAE2006 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, Germany, OMAE2006-92600.
ASME B31G, 2009. Manual for Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, American Society of Mechanical Engineer, New York.
Benjamin, A. C. and Andrade, E. Q., 2003. Modified method for the assessment of the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, Rio Pipeline Conference.
Benjamin, A. C., Freire, J. L. F., Vieira, R. D. and Andrade, E. Q., 2006. Burst tests on pipeline containing closely spaced corrosion defects, Proceedings of OMAE2006 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, Germany, OMAE2006-92131.
Benjamin, A. C., Freire, J. L. F., Vieira, R. D., Diniz, J. L. C. and Andrade, E. Q., 2005. Burst tests on pipeline containing interacting corrosion defects, Proceedings of OMAE2005 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Halkidiki, Greece, OMAE2005-67059.
Benjamin, A. C., Vieira, R. D., Freire, J. L. F. and Castro, J. T. P., 2000. Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion, Proceedings of the 3rd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2, 793–799.
BS 7910, 2005. Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures, British Standards, UK.
Chiodo, M. S. G. and Ruggieri, C., 2009. Failure assessments of corroded pipelines with axial defects using stress-based criteria: Numerical studies and verification analysis, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 86, 164–176.
Choi, J. B., Goo, B. K., Kim, J. C., Kim, Y. J. and Kim, W. S., 2003. Development of limit load solutions for corroded gas pipelines, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 80, 121–128.
Cronin, D. S. and Pick. R. J., 2000. Experimental database for corroded pipe: Evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G, Proceedings of the 3rd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2, 757–767.
DNV-RP-F101, 2004. Recommended Practice, DNV-RP-F101, Corroded Pipelines, Det Norske Veritas, Norway.
Fekete, G. and Varga, L., 2012. The effect of the width to length ratios of corrosion defects on the burst pressures of transmission pipelines, Engineering Failure Analysis, 21, 21–30.
Freire, J. L. F., Vieira, R. D., Castro, J. T. P. and Benjamin, A. C., 2006. Part 3: Burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss, Experimental Techniques, 11, 60–65.
Fu, B. and Kirkwood, M. G., 1995. Determination of Failure pressure of corroded linepipes using the nonlinear finite element method, Proceedings of 2nd International Pipeline Technology Conference, 2, 1–10.
Han, L. H. and Liu, C. D., 1998. Limit load analysis for local wall-thinning pipeline under internal pressure, Pressure Vessel Technology, 15(4): 1–4. (in Chinese)
Karstensen, A. and Smith, S., 2001. Corrosion damage assessment and burst test validation of 8in X52 linepipe, Pressure Vessel Piping Design Analysis, 430, 189–194.
Kiefner, J. F. and Vieth, P. H., 1989. A Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe, Final report for PR-3-805, Project to the Pipeline Supervisory Committee of the American Gas Association, Battelle, Ohio.
Kim, W. S., Kim, Y. P., Kho, Y. T. and Choi, J. B., 2002. Full scale burst test and finite element analysis on corroded gas pipeline, Proceedings of IPC2002 4th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, IPC2002-27037.
Kim, Y. P., Kim, W. S., Lee, Y. K. and Oh, K. H., 2004. The evaluation of failure pressure for corrosion defects within girth or seam weld in transmission pipelines, Proceedings of IPC2004 5th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, IPC2004-216.
Leis, B. N. and Stephens, D. R., 1997. An alternative approach to assess the integrity of corroded line pipe-Part I: current status and Part II: alternative criterion, Proceedings of the 7th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, USA, 4, 624–641.
Ma, B., Shuai, J., Liu, D. and Xu, K., 2013. Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects, Engineering Failure Analysis, 32, 209–219.
Maes, M. A., Salama, M. M. and Dann, M., 2006. Reliability of burst limit states for damaged and corroded high strength pipelines, Proceedings of OMAE2006 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, Germany, OMAE2006-92605.
Noronha, D. B., Benjamin, A. C. and Andrade, E. Q., 2002. Finite assessment models for the prediction of the failure pressure of pipelines with long corrosion defects, Proceedings of IPC2002 4th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, IPC2002-27037.
Shuai, J., Zhang, C. E. and Chen, F. L., 2008. Prediction of failure pressure in corroded pipelines based on non-linear finite element analysis, Acta Petrolei Sinica, 29(6): 933–937. (in Chinese)
Stephens, D. R. and Leis, B. N., 2000. Development of an alternative criterion for residual strength of corrosion defects in moderate-to-high-toughness pipe, Proceedings of the 3rd International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2, 781–792.
Tan, K. R. and Xiao, X., 2006. Analysis on limit load of corroded submarine pipelines, The Ocean Engineering, 24(3): 63–67. (in Chinese)
Vieth, P. H. and Kiefner, J. F., 1994. Database of corroded pipe tests, Pipeline Research Supervisory Committee, PRC International, AGA Catalog Number L51689.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This project is financially supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2011CB013702), and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No. NCET-11-0051).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Su, Cl., Li, X. & Zhou, J. Failure pressure analysis of corroded moderate-to-high strength pipelines. China Ocean Eng 30, 69–82 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-016-0004-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-016-0004-z