Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of actual waiting time and perceived waiting time on treatment satisfaction in patients receiving outpatient diabetes care

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Diabetology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 January 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Aims

We investigated the impact of actual waiting time and perceived waiting time on treatment satisfaction in patients with diabetes receiving outpatient care.

Methods

Three hundred and thirty-six outpatients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance were selected and the time they spent in reception, blood collection, consultation, and accounting were recorded to measure the time they spent waiting in the hospital (actual waiting time). Simultaneously, we conducted a questionnaire survey that included questions on their perceptions of the waiting time (perceived waiting time) and satisfaction with treatment (DTSQ).

Results

No significant relationship was found between actual waiting time and DTSQ score, although associations were observed with perceived waiting time. The patients who felt the overall waiting time was long scored 23.0, those who felt it was short scored 26.0, and those who felt it was very short scored 34.0, with those who felt the waiting time was long having a significantly lower score (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, respectively) and those who felt it was short having a significantly lower score than those who felt it was very short (p = 0.008). In addition, more patients who felt the waiting time was long expressed dissatisfaction with the responses of doctors and staff than those who felt the waiting time was short.

Conclusions

These results suggest that in addition to reducing actual waiting times, shortening perceived waiting times by improving the responses of medical staff could help to increase patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Health, Labour and Welfare Ministry. Japanese Practice Guidance to improve Patients’ Adherence to Appointments for Diabetes Care. http://human-data.or.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/dm_jushinchudan_guide43_e.pdf; 2014. Accessed on 13 Oct 2020.

  2. Tanaka M, Ito H, Nemoto A, Ikeda N, Omoto T, Shinozaki M, et al. Relationship between the history of intermittent treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus and the risk of diabetic vascular complications. J Jpn Diab Soc. 2019;58(2):100–8 (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Okudaira M, Uchigata Y, Okada T, Iwarmoto Y. Influence of health checkup and previous intermittent treatment on diabetic complications. J Jpn Diab Soc. 2003;46(10):781–5 (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saisho Y, Itoh H. Relationship between treatment satisfaction and intention to drop out in outpatients with type 2 diabetes. J Japan Diab Soc. 2012;55(10):768–73 (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley C. The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire: DTSQ. In: Bradley C, editor. Handbook of psychology and diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1994. p. 111–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Home PD, Lindholm A, Riis A. Insulin aspart vs human insulin in the management of long-term blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2000;17:762–70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00380.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashwell SG, Bradley C, Stephens JW, Witthaus E. Treatment satisfaction and quality of life with insulin glargine plus insulin lispro compared with NPH insulin plus unmodified human insulin in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1112–7. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-1183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Best JH, Boye KS, Rubin RR, Cao D, Kim TH, Peyrot M. Improved treatment satisfaction and weight related quality of life with exenatide once weekly or twice daily. Diabet Med. 2009;26:722–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02752.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Camacho F, Anderson R, Safrit A, Jones AS, Hoffmann P. The relationship between patient’s perceived waiting time and office based practice satisfaction. N C Med J. 2006;67(6):409–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rayson RS, Mas’uud IS, Thiru T, Lian LL, Yu HK. Factors affecting follow-up non-attendance in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a systematic review. Singap Med J. 2019;60:216–23. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Archibald LK, Gill GV. Diabetic clinic defaulters—who are they and why do they default? Pract Diabetes Int. 1992;9:13–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammersley MS, Holland MR, Walford S, Thorn PA. What happens to defaulters from a diabetic clinic? Br Med J. 1985;291:1330–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.291.6505.1330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Holly C, Robert AW, Sarah N, Thomas PG, Bich ND. The psychology of the wait time experience—what clinics can do to manage the waiting experience for patients: a longitudinal, qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4301-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhenzhen X, Calvin O. Associations between waiting times, service times, and patient satisfaction in an endocrinology outpatient department: a time study and questionnaire survey. Inquiry. 2017;54:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958017739527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Locke R, Stefano M, Koster A, Taylor B, Greenspan J. Optimizing patient/caregiver satisfaction through quality of communication in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(11):1016–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235be06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boudreaux ED, Friedman J, Chansky ME, Baumann BM. Emergency department patient satisfaction: examining the role of acuity. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(2):162–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mowen JC, Licata JW, McPhail J. Waiting in the emergency room: how to improve patient satisfaction. J Health Care Mark. 1993;13(2):26–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor S. Waiting for service: the relationship between delays and evaluations of service. J Market. 1994;58:56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson DA, Yarnold PR, Williams DR, Adams SL. Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(6):657–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70090-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levesque J, Bogoch ER, Cooney B, Johnston B, Wright JG. Improving patient satisfaction with time spent in an orthopedic outpatient clinic. Can J Surg. 2000;43(6):431–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Emily TLH. Improving waiting time and operational clinic flow in a tertiary diabetes center. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014;2(2):u201918.w1006. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u201918.w1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jehni R, Melody P, Yara M, Carol JP. Losing the wait: improving patient cycle time in primary care. BMJ Open Qual. 2020;9:e000910. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tokunaga M, Watanabe S, Nakane N. Survey on outpatients’ waiting time and satisfaction level. J Jpn Soc Health Care Manag. 2006;7(2):324–8 (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by ST-S and TT. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ST-S and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiori Toga-Sato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Shiori Toga-Sato declares no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript. Takahiro Tosaki received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD and Takeda, and research funding from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Daiichi Sankyo and Takeda. Masaki Kondo received research funding from Johnson & Johnson, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Taisho Toyama, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi, Takeda, Japan Tobacco, Novo Nordisk and Ono. Shin Tsunekawa received research funding from Johnson & Johnson, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Taisho Toyama, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi, Takeda, Japan Tobacco, Novo Nordisk and Ono. Yoshiro Kato received research funding from Johnson & Johnson, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Taisho Toyama, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi, Takeda, Japan Tobacco, Novo Nordisk and Ono. Jiro Nakamura received lecture fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Ono, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, MSD, Taisho Toyama, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Astellas and Shionogi, and research funding from Johnson & Johnson, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Taisho Toyama, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi, Takeda, Japan Tobacco, Novo Nordisk and Ono. Hideki Kamiya received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Ono, Novartis, Astellas, MSD, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and Novo Nordisk, and research funding from Johnson & Johnson, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Taisho Toyama, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi, Takeda, Japan Tobacco, Novo Nordisk and Ono.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to table 2 and 3 was published incorrectly and corrected in this version.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toga-Sato, S., Tosaki, T., Kondo, M. et al. Impact of actual waiting time and perceived waiting time on treatment satisfaction in patients receiving outpatient diabetes care. Diabetol Int 12, 293–300 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-020-00486-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-020-00486-y

Keywords

Navigation