Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Profile of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Outborn and Inborn Babies at a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To study the profile of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) among outborn and inborn babies at a tertiary-care centre.

Methodology

In a prospective observational study from 2015–2016, outborn and inborn babies eligible for ROP screening were evaluated for ROP profile and treatment results.

Results

532 outborns and 38 inborns had ROP. Respiratory distress, sepsis and apnea were present in 81.3%, 51.5% and 36.2% of outborns with ROP and 68.4%, 39.4% and 36.8% of inborns with ROP. Type 1 ROP was noted in 49.2% eyes of outborns with ROP and 36.8% eyes of inborns with ROP. Type 1 ROP regressed with laser in 97.3% and 100% eyes of outborn and inborn with ROP, respectively. Stage 4, 5 and sequelae were noted in 5.2%, 22.8% and 4.6% eyes of outborns with ROP, respectively, but none in inborns.

Conclusions

Quality neonatal care and timely screening ensured lesser ROP-related morbidity in inborns as compared to outborns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zin A, Gole GA. Retinopathy of prematurity-incidence today. Clin Perinatal. 2013;40:185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal R, Deorari AK, Azad RV, et al. Changing profile of retinopathy of prematurity. J Trop Pediatr. 2002;48:239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar P, Sankar MJ, Deorari A, et al. Risk factors for severe retinopathy of prematurity in preterm low birth weight neonates. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78:812–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blencowe H, Lawn JE, Vazquez T, et al. Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res. 2013; 74 Suppl 1: 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pjaver RK, Bilagi AP, Vinekar A, Deorari AK, Jalali S. Evidence based ROP guidelines in the NNF Evidence based guidelines. 2010. 253–63. Available from: http://aimaonline.org/iap-neochap-2013/uploads/acd-corner/nnf_guidelines-2011.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2020.

  6. International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol. 1960 2005; 123: 991–999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960 2003; 121: 1684–1694.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chaudhari S, Patwardhan V, Vaidya U, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity in a tertiary care center-incidence, risk factors and outcome. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:219–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mintz-Hittner HA, Kennedy KA, Chuang AZ, et al. Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:603–615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jalali S, Anand R, Rani PK, et al. Impact of the day-30 screening strategy on the disease presentation and outcome of retinopathy of prematurity. The Indian twin cities retinopathy of prematurity report number 3. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:610–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patwardhan SD, Azad R, Gogia V, et al. Prevailing clinical practices regarding screening for retinopathy of prematurity among pediatricians in India: A pilot survey. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59:427–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanghi G, Dogra MR, Katoch D, et al. Demographic profile of infants with stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity in North India: Implications for screening. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011;18:72–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Azad R, Chandra P, Gangwe A, et al. Lack of screening underlies most stage-5 retinopathy of prematurity among cases presenting to a tertiary eye center in India. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sivanandan S, Chandra P, Deorari AK, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity: AIIMS, New Delhi experience. Indian Pediatr. 2016; 53 Suppl 2: S123–S128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PC, RA, MJS, RC, RV, AK: substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; AS, DK, MJS, PC: acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AS, DK, PC, RA, MJS, RC: drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parijat Chandra.

Ethics declarations

Institutional Ethical Committee, AIIMS, New Delhi; No. IESC/T-01/21.01.2015, RT-18, dated April 1, 2015.

Additional information

Competing interest

None stated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sachan, A., Chandra, P., Agarwal, R. et al. Profile of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Outborn and Inborn Babies at a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital. Indian Pediatr 57, 1020–1022 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-2027-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-2027-z

Keywords

Navigation