Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and Validity of a Physical Activity Questionnaire for Indian Children and Adolescents

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In low- and middle-income countries, sedentary behavior is widely prevalent in the young. Reliable and valid instruments are essential for evaluating sedentary behavior and physical activity in children and adolescents.

Objective

To evaluate the reliability and validity of an easy to use physical activity questionnaire for children and adolescents from India.

Study design

Evaluation of a questionnaire tool.

Participants

104 children and adolescents belonging to the age group of 10–17 years were selected using a purposive sampling technique.

Methods

The Madras Diabetes Research Foundation — Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents [MPAQ(c)] was used to assess the various dimensions of physical activity. Physical activity was also objectively assessed using accelerometer worn around the waist for five complete days. The baseline administration of MPAQ(c) was done between November and December, 2017. Reliability of MPAQ was assessed by repeat administration after 2 weeks for upto a month later. Validity of MPAQ(c) was measured against accelerometer using Spearman’s correlation and Bland and Altman agreements.

Results

Test-retest reliability of the questionnaire revealed good agreement (ICC: 0.77 min/wk). Correlation coefficients (95% CI) for sedentary behavior and moderate to vigorous physical activity for MPAQ(c) against accelerometer were 0.52 (0.36, 0.64) and 0.41 (0.23, 0.55), respectively indicating moderate correlation. Good agreement was present between MPAQ(c) and accelerometer for sedentary behavior [mean bias = −4.9 (±2SD -197.1 to 187.3) min/d].

Conclusion

MPAQ(c) is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating physical activity in Indian children aged 10–17 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports. 1985;100:126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Guthold R, Cowan MJ, Autenrieth CS, Kann L, Riley LM. Physical activity and sedentary behavior among schoolchildren: A 34-country comparison. J Pediatr. 2010;157:43–9.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauman A, Phongsavan P, Schoeppe S, Owen N. Physical activity measurement — a primer for health promotion. Promot Educ. 2006;13:92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sallis JF. Measuring physical activity: Practical approaches for program evaluation in Native American communities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010;16:404–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Skender S, Ose J, Chang-Claude J, Paskow M, Brühmann B, Siegel EM, et al. Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires — A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR, Jr. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: A generalizability study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1637–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cossio BM, Mendez CJ, Luarte RC, Vargas VR, Canqui FB, Gomez CR. Physical activity patterns of school adolescents: Validity, reliability and percentiles proposal for their evaluation. Revista Chilena de Pediatria. 2017;88:73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anjana RM, Sudha V, Lakshmipriya N, Subhashini S, Pradeepa R, Geetha L, et al. Reliability and validity of a new physical activity questionnaire for India. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14: 411–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santos-Lozano A, Santin-Medeiros F, Cardon G, Torres-Luque G, Bailon R, Bergmeir C, et al. Actigraph GT3X: Validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34:975–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ridley K, Ainsworth BE, Olds TS. Development of a compendium of energy expenditures for youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2008;5:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Butte NF, Watson KB, Ridley K, Zakeri IF, McMurray RG, Pfeiffer KA, et al. A Youth Compendium of Physical Activities: Activity codes and metabolic intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:246–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psych Assess. 1994;6:284–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:777–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chinapaw MJ, Slootmaker SM, Schuit AJ, van Zuidam M, van Mechelen W. Reliability and validity of the activity questionnaire for adults and adolescents (AQuAA). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, van Poppel MN, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for youth: A systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med. 2010;40:539–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lockwood J, Jeffery A, Schwartz A, Manlhiot C, Schneiderman JE, McCrindle BW, et al. Comparison of a physical activity recall questionnaire with accelerometry in children and adolescents with obesity: A pilot study. Obesity. 2017;12:e41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Voss C, Dean PH, Gardner RF, Duncombe SL, Harris KC. Validity and reliability of the physical activity questionnaire for children (PAQ-C) and adolescents (PAQ-A) in individuals with congenital heart disease. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathews E, Salvo D, Sarma PS, Thankappan KR, Pratt M. Adapting and validating the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) for Trivandrum, India, 2013. Prev Chronic Disease. 2016;13:E53.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adamo KB, Prince SA, Tricco AC, Connor-Gorber S, Tremblay M. A comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: a systematic review. Int J Obesity: 2009;4:2–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schnurr TM, Bech B, Nielsen TRH, Andersen IG, Hjorth MF, Aadahl M, et al. Self-reported versus accelerometer-assessed daily physical activity in childhood obesity treatment. Percept Mot Skills. 2017;124:795–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Troiano RP. Accelerometer use in physical activity: Best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S582–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanhelst J, Hardy L, Gottrand F, Beghin L. Technical aspects and relevance of physical activity assessment in children and adolescents in free-living conditions. Arch Pediatr. 2012;19:1219–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding: None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contributors: TSM: involved in conduct of the study, writing the first draft of manuscript and carrying out consecutive revisions; HR: co-ordinated the study, helped in data analysis and revisions of the manuscript; CA: analyzed the data and helped in data interpretation; NJ: collected the data and gave inputs to the manuscript; MP,VM: contributed to critical revisions for intellectual content of the manuscript; RMA: conceptualized the study, contributed inputs to data analysis and revisions of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjit Mohan Anjana.

Ethics declarations

Ethical clearance: Institutional ethics committee of Madras Diabetes Research foundation; No. IRB00002640, December, 2014.

Competing interest: None stated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehreen, T.S., Ranjani, H., Anitha, C. et al. Reliability and Validity of a Physical Activity Questionnaire for Indian Children and Adolescents. Indian Pediatr 57, 707–711 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-1912-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-1912-9

Keywords

Navigation