Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of isotonic (0.9%) vs. hypotonic (0.18%) saline as maintenance intravenous fluids in children: A randomized controlled trial

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of isotonic versus hypotonic maintenance fluid in children.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Tertiary-level teaching hospital.

Participants

60 children (age 0.5 to 12 years) who were admitted and anticipated to receive intravenous fluid for the next 48 hours.

Intervention

Hypotonic fluid (Standard maintenance volume as 0.18% NaCl in 5% dextrose) or Isotonic fluid (60% Standard maintenance volume as 0.9% NaCl solution in 5% dextrose).

Outcome measures

Primary: Incidence of hyponatremia. Secondary: Serum sodium, serum osmolality, blood sugar, blood urea, serum creatinine, serum potassium, serum chloride, pH, urine output, change in weight, morbidity and death.

Results

At 24 hours, hyponatremia was noted in 7 (24%) patients in the isotonic and 16 (55%) in hypotonic group (P=0.031). At 48 hours, hyponatremia was noted in 4 (14%) and 13 (45%) patients in isotonic and hypotonic group, respectively (P=0.02). There was significant change in sodium levels in both isotonic (P=0.036) and hypotonic (P<0.001) intervention groups. The peak fall in mean serum sodium level was noted at 24 hours (−6.5, 95%CI: −3.5, −9.6 mEq/L; P<0.001) in hypotonic group. In isotonic group, there was significant increase between 24 and 48 hours (4.3, 95% CI: 0.1, 8.4 mEq/L; P=0.04).

Conclusions

Reduced volume isotonic fluid results in fewer episodes of hyponatremia than hypotonic fluid in sick children during the first 48 hours of intravenous fluid therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holliday MA, Segar ME. Maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy. Pediatrics. 1957;19:823–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson RJ. Hospital associated hyponatremia. Kidney lnt. 1986;29:1237–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arieff AI, Ayus JC, Fraser CL, Hyponatraemia and death or permanent brain damage in healthy children. BMJ. 1992;304:1218–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Halberthal M, Halperin ML, Bohn D. Acute hyponatremia in children admitted in hospital. BMJ. 2001;322:780–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holliday MA, Friedman A, Segar ME, Chesney R, Finberg L. Acute hospital induced hyponatremia in children: A physiological approach. J Pediatr. 2004;145:584–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montañana PA, Modesto i Alapont V, Ocón AP, López PO, López Prats JL, et al. The use of isotonic fluid as maintenance therapy prevents iatrogenic hyponatremia in pediatrics: A randomized, controlled open study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:658–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Briassoulis G, Venkataraman S, Thompson AE. Energy expenditure in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1166–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Choong K, Bohn D. Maintenance parenteral fluids in the critically ill child. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007; 83:S3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duke T, Mokela D, Frank D, Michael A, Paulo T, Mgone J, et al. Management of meningitis in children with oral fluid restriction or intravenous fluid at maintenance volumes: a randomized trial. Ann Trop Pediatr. 2002;22:145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoorn EJ, Geary D, Robb M, Halperin ML, Bohn D. Acute hyponatremia related to intravenous fluid administration in hospitalized children: An observational study. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brazel P, McPhee IP. Inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone in postoperative scoliosis patients: The role of fluid management. Spine. 1996;21:727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neville K, Verge C, Rosenberg A, O’Meara M, Walker J. Isotonic is better than hypotonic saline for intravenous rehydration of children with gastroenteritis: A prospective randomized study. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:226–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kannan L, Lodha R, Vivekanandhan S, Bagga A, Kabra SK, Kabra M. Intravenous fluid regimen and hyponatraemia among children: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25:2303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yung M, Keeley S. Randomised controlled trial of intravenous maintenance fluids. J Paediatr Child Health. 2009;45:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choong K, Arora S, Cheng J, Farrokhyar F, Reddy D, Thabane L, et al. Hypotonic versus isotonic maintenance fluids after surgery in children: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011;128:857–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saba TG, Fairbairn J, Houghton F, Laforte D, Foster BJ. A randomized controlled trial of isotonic versus hypotonic maintenance intravenous fluids in hospitalized children. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmar Shamim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shamim, A., Afzal, K. & Manazir Ali, S. Safety and efficacy of isotonic (0.9%) vs. hypotonic (0.18%) saline as maintenance intravenous fluids in children: A randomized controlled trial . Indian Pediatr 51, 969–974 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0542-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0542-5

Keywords

Navigation