Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value of gallbladder length-to-width ratio for diagnosis of biliary atresia by correlation with age

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective is to explore the correlation between ultrasonic gallbladder length–width ratio (LTWR) and age, and the value of differential diagnosis between biliary atresia (BA) and other hepatic cholestasis. From January 2016 to June 2022, the data of 183 patients with jaundice who underwent abdominal ultrasound and surgical exploration in the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. The demographic data, liver function, and ultrasonic parameters were recorded and analyzed. There were statistically significant differences between BA group and non-BA group in maximum length, maximum width and LTWR of gallbladder (P < 0.001). In all age groups (I: ≤ 30 days; II: 31–60 days; III: 61–90 days; IV: 91–120 days; V: ≥ 121 days), in which group III (61–90 days) had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.843, and group V (≥121 days) had the lowest AUC of 0.548. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of gallbladder LTWR > 3.26 for BA in group II (31–60 days) were 78.9%, 75.0%, 75.0%, 78.9% and 76.9%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of gallbladder LTWR > 3.69 for BA in group III (61–90 days) were 76.6%, 84.6%, 92.5%, 59.5% and 78.9%, respectively. Ultrasonography LTWR of gallbladder has certain value in the diagnosis of BA. The diagnostic value of gallbladder LTWR in infants with different ages was quite different, and it was relatively high in infants with 31–90 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Data are, however, available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with permission of the interviewees.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

AUC:

Area under the curve

BA:

Biliary atresia

DBIL:

Direct bilirubin

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

GGT:

Gamma-glutamyl transferase

IQR:

Interquartile range

IOC:

Intraoperative cholangiography

LTWR:

Length-to-width ratio

SD:

Standard deviation

TBIL:

Total bilirubin

References

  1. Lendahl U, Lui V, Chung P, Tam P (2021) Biliary atresia-emerging diagnostic and therapy opportunities. EBioMedicine 74:103689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103689

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rabbani T, Guthery SL, Himes R, Shneider BL, Harpavat S (2021) Newborn screening for biliary atresia: a review of current methods. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 23(12):28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-021-00825-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lakshminarayanan B, Davenport M (2016) Biliary atresia: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun 73:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schreiber RA, Harpavat S, Hulscher J, Wildhaber BE (2021) Epidemiology, screening and public policy. J Clin Med 11(4):999. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung PH, Wong KK, Tam PK (2015) Predictors for failure after Kasai operation. J Pediatr Surg 50(2):293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yerina SE, Ekong UD (2021) Biliary Atresia/Neonatal cholestasis: what is in the horizon. Pediatr Clin North Am 68(6):1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2021.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Napolitano M, Franchi-Abella S, Damasio BM et al (2021) Practical approach for the diagnosis of biliary atresia on imaging, part 2: magnetic resonance cholecystopancreatography, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, percutaneous cholecysto-cholangiography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous liver biopsy, risk scores and decisional flowchart. Pediatr Radiol 51(8):1545–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05034-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen X, Dong R, Shen Z, Yan W, Zheng S (2016) Value of Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase for diagnosis of biliary atresia by correlation with age. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 63(3):370–373. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemoine C, Melin-Aldana H, Brandt K, Mohammad S, Superina R (2020) The evolution of early liver biopsy findings in babies with jaundice may delay the diagnosis and treatment of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 55(5):866–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Jiang J, Wang H (2022) Ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of biliary atresia in pediatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test. Transl Pediatr. 11(5):748–756

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohyama K, Fujikawa A, Okamura T et al (2021) The triangular cord ratio and the presence of a cystic lesion in the triangular cord suggested new ultrasound findings in the early diagnosis of biliary atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 37(12):1693–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duan X, Peng Y, Liu W, Yang L, Zhang J (2019) Does supersonic shear wave elastography help differentiate biliary atresia from other causes of cholestatic hepatitis in infants less than 90 days old? compared with grey-scale US. Biomed Res Int 2019:9036362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9036362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Choochuen P, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Charoonratana V, Sangkhathat S (2019) Is, “gallbladder length-to-width ratio” useful in diagnosing biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 54(9):1946–1952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou LY, Wang W, Shan QY et al (2015) Optimizing the US diagnosis of biliary atresia with a modified triangular cord thickness and gallbladder classification. Radiology 277(1):181–191. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L, Yang Y, Chen Y, Zhan J (2018) Early differential diagnosis methods of biliary atresia: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 34(4):363–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4229-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Jia LQ, Hu YX, Xin Y, Yang X, Wang XM (2021) Development and validation of a nomogram incorporating ultrasonic and elastic findings for the preoperative diagnosis of biliary atresia. Acad Radiol 28(Suppl 1):S55–S63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Xu R, Wu D et al (2021) Development and validation of a novel nomogram and risk score for biliary atresia in patients with cholestasis. Dig Liver Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2021.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Guindi MA, Sira MM, Konsowa HA, El-Abd OL, Salem TA (2013) Value of hepatic subcapsular flow by color doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of biliary atresia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28(5):867–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou LY, Chen SL, Chen HD et al (2018) Percutaneous US-guided Cholecystocholangiography with microbubbles for assessment of infants with us findings equivocal for biliary atresia and gallbladder longer than 1.5 cm: a pilot study. Radiology 286(3):1033–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Zunyi city, Guizhou Province of China (no. [2019] 104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contributions: (I) conception and design: ZKZ, TY, and JZ; (II) administrative support: JZ; (III) provision of study materials or patients: all the authors; (IV) collection and assembly of data: all the authors; (V) data analysis and interpretation: all the authors; (VI) manuscript writing: ZKZ, JZ; (VII) final approval of manuscript: all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhu Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No financial or non-financial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University approved the study protocol.

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, K., Tang, Y., Zheng, Z. et al. Value of gallbladder length-to-width ratio for diagnosis of biliary atresia by correlation with age. Updates Surg 75, 915–920 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01427-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01427-x

Keywords

Navigation