Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

TG18 recommends bailout surgery (BOS) for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there is not a clear criterion on the decision process on whether to continue laparoscopic BOS or open BOS, and optimal procedure for treatment for the remnant cystic bile duct also awaits discussion. We comparted with open BOS and laparoscopic BOS, and compared with suture close and clipping or ligating of remnant cystic duct. We have accrued 57 patients underwent BOS during study period. Seventeen cases underwent laparoscopic BOS, and 38 cases underwent open BOS. There were 22 patients were accrued in suture closing and 35 patients were accrued in clipping or ligating. Open BOS experienced high levels of CRP, WBC, NLR, and CAR, and was associated with significantly longer hospitalization, operating time, and amount of bleeding. Suture close was higher in patients with preoperative endoscopic lithotripsy (EL). BOS can be sufficiently performed under laparoscopy. Patients underwent preoperative EL tended to be higher necessity to suture close of cystic duct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. NIH Consensus conference (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 269(8):1018–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleisher LA, Yee K, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Heath R et al (1999) Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost-effective? A model to study transition of care. Anesthesiology 90(6):1746–1755. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199906000-00033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):73–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sabour AF, Matsushima K, Love BE, Alicuben ET, Schellenberg MA, Inaba K et al (2020) Nationwide trends in the use of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surgery 167(3):569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Omiya K, Hiramatsu K, Shibata Y, Fukaya M, Fujii M, Aoba T et al (2021) Preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for detecting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Diagnostics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030383

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimoda M, Udo R, Imasato R, Oshiro Y, Suzuki S (2021) What are the risk factors of conversion from total cholecystectomy to bailout surgery? Surg Endosc 35(5):2206–2210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07626-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strasberg SM, Pucci MJ, Brunt LM, Deziel DJ (2016) Subtotal cholecystectomy-“fenestrating” vs “reconstituting” subtypes and the prevention of bile duct injury: definition of the optimal procedure in difficult operative conditions. J Am Coll Surg 222(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H et al (2013) TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0568-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang A, Cohan CM, Beattie G, Mooney CM, Chiang A, Keeley JA (2020) Factors that predict the need for subtotal cholecystectomy. Am Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820979783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koo JGA, Chan YH, Shelat VG (2021) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: comparison of reconstituting and fenestrating techniques. Surg Endosc 35(3):1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08096-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LeCompte MT, Robbins KJ, Williams GA, Sanford DE, Hammill CW, Fields RC et al (2020) Less is more in the difficult gallbladder: recent evolution of subtotal cholecystectomy in a single HPB unit. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07759-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bekki T, Abe T, Amano H, Hanada K, Kobayashi T, Noriyuki T et al (2021) Validation of the Tokyo guideline 2018 treatment proposal for acute cholecystitis from a single-center retrospective analysis. Asian J Endosc Surg 14(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujiwara S, Kaino K, Iseya K, Koyamada N (2020) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult cases of acute cholecystitis: a simple technique using barbed sutures. Surg Case Rep 6(1):238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-01026-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No contributory.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and interpretation: YK. Performed data acquisition, as well as provided administrative, technical, and material support: YK and SS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsugi Shimoda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimoda, M., Kuboyama, Y. & Suzuki, S. Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Updates Surg 74, 1611–1616 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01266-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01266-w

Keywords

Navigation