Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ileo-right colonic reconstruction preserving all four colonic vessels after esophagectomy for cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When colonic graft is used as an esophageal substitute after esophagectomy, one or two feeding vessels of the colon are cut to obtain sufficient length, the graft is passed via the subcutaneous route, and microvascular anastomosis is often used to avoid fatal complications. Sixteen consecutive ileo-right colonic reconstructions via the posterior mediastinal or retrosternal route with preservation of all four colonic vessels were performed in the past eight years. We presented the surgical technique and evaluation of this surgical method. In 15 out of 16 consecutive cases, the graft could be pulled up to the neck through the posterior mediastinal or retrosternal route while preserving all four colonic vessels. Reconstruction was not possible in one patient because of ileocolic vessel injury during colonic mobilization. Anastomotic leakage occurred in three patients, but all were minor and were treated conservatively. There were no patients with graft necrosis resulting from insufficient blood supply. Ileo-right colonic reconstruction with preservation of all four colonic vessels through the posterior mediastinal or retrosternal route is a safe and feasible procedure and is considered the first choice for colonic reconstruction as an esophageal substitute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data shown in this study will be freely available to any researcher.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds) (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th edn. John Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawano T, Nishikage T, Kawada K, Nakajima Y, Kojima K, Nagai K (2009) Subcutaneous reconstruction using ileocolon with preserved ileocolic vessels following esophagectomy or in esophageal bypass operation. Dig Surg 26:200–204. https://doi.org/10.1159/000217799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkins EW Jr (1980) Long-segment colon substitution for the esophagus. Ann Surg 192:722–725. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198012000-00005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Watanabe M, Mine S, Nishida K, Kurogochi T, Okamura A, Imamura Y (2016) Reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients with a history of gastrectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 64:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-016-0661-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mine S, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Ueno M, Ehara K, Haruta S (2009) Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 88:1647–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, Aoki Y, Okada M (2012) Esophageal reconstruction using the terminal ileum and right colon in esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today 42:342–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0103-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bothereau H, Munoz-Bongrand N, Lambert BN, Montemagno S, Cattan P, Sarfati E (2007) Esophageal reconstruction after caustic injury: is there still a place for right coloplasty? Am J Surg 193:660–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Schneider M, Ophoff K, Schumpelick V, Jansen M (2010) Operative outcome of colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal cancer: a 20-year experience. Surgery 147:491–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Popovici Z (2003) A new philosophy in esophageal reconstruction with colon. Thirty-years experience. Dis Esophagus 16:323–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2003.00358.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sonneland J, Anson BJ, Beaton LE (1958) Surgical anatomy of the arterial supply to the colon from the superior mesenteric artery based upon a study of 600 specimens. Surg Gynecol Obst 106:385–398

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wain JC, Wright CD, Kuo EY, Moncure AC, Wilkins EW Jr, Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ (1999) Long-segment colon interposition for acquired esophageal disease. Ann Thorac Surg 67:313–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00029-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC (1995) Esophageal replacement by colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg 59:1382–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00182-K

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas P, Fuentes P, Giudicelli R, Reboud E (1997) Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: current indications and long-term function. Ann Thorac Surg 64:757–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00678-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moorehead RJ, Wong J (1990) Gangrene in esophageal substitutes after resection and bypass procedures for carcinoma of the esophagus. Hepatogastroenterology 37:364–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kano H (2012) Anterior vs. posterior mediastinal routes in colon interposition after esophagectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 59:1832–1834

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown J, Lewis WG, Foliaki A, Clark GWB, Blackshaw GRJ, Chan DSY (2018) Colonic interposition after adult oesophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of conduit choice and outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 22:1104–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3735-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukaya M, Abe T, Yokoyama Y, Itatsu K, Nagino M (2014) Two-stage operation for synchronous triple primary cancer of the esophagus, stomach, and ampulla of Vater: report of a case. Surg Today 44:967–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0549-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss ARR, Hackl C, Soeder Y, Schlitt HJ, Dahlke MH (2016) Ileo-right hemi-colonic cervical pull-up on a non-supercharged ileocolic arterial pedicle: a technical and case report. World J Gastroenterol 22:3869–3874. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i14.3869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Editage Group (https://www.editage.jp), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirou Kuwabara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Niigata City General Hospital.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was not applicable to this study.

Consent for publication

All authors consented to publishing this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuwabara, S., Kobayashi, K., Uehara, H. et al. Ileo-right colonic reconstruction preserving all four colonic vessels after esophagectomy for cancer. Updates Surg 73, 2239–2246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01033-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01033-3

Keywords

Navigation