Skip to main content
Log in

Fatigue Damage Assessment of Tensile Specimen Considering Opening Stress in Crack Propagation Stage

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the structures in service are subjected to cyclic loading of variable amplitude. The effect of load interaction is necessary to accurately predict the fatigue life of components in design phase. In the present paper, a fatigue damage methodology under complex loading history is proposed considering two stages of damage process and considering the effect of sequence of loading. This is further modified by considering opening stress in crack propagation stage. The proposed methodologies are compared with the linear damage rule by illustrating an example of dynamically induced stress in a slender bar under uniform axial time varying force. The effect of various influencing parameters on fatigue life of bar is also studied. The proposed methodologies are further validated using experimental fatigue test results. The comparison shows a good agreement between theoretical and experimental results. It is found that conventional Miner’s rule estimates higher damage index compared to the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atasever, K. (2015). Modelling hysteretic behaviour of u-shaped steel dampers and using such dampers with low damping rubber bearings as seismic isolator. Istanbul Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. E. (1972). Fatigue life and inelastic strain response under complex histories for analloy steel. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, J. A., & Humphrey, J. C. W. (1903). The fracture of metals under repeated alternations of stress. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 200, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1903.0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. W. (1977). Bridge fatigue guide design and details. American Institute of Steel Construction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, K., Liu, G., & Tang, W. (2021). An improved Manson-Halford Model for Multi-level nonlinear fatigue life prediction. International Journal of Fatigue, 151, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, H. J. (1960). An observation concerning the cycle ratio in cumulative damage. In Symposium on fatigue of aircraft structures. ASTM International.

  • Kujawski, D., & Ellyin, F. (1984). A fatigue crack propagation model. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 20(5–6), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(84)90079-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutes, L. D., Corazao, M., Hu, S. J., & Zimmerman, J. (1984). Stochastic fatigue damage accumulation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 110(11), 2585–2601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson, S. S., & Halford, G. R. (1981). Practical implementation of the double linear damage rule and damage curve approach for treating cumulative fatigue damage. International Journal of Fracture, 17(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirovitch, L. (1986). Elements of vibration analysis. McGraw Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, M. A. (1945). Cumulative damage in fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12(3), A159–A164. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papakyriacou, M., Mayer, H., Pypen, C., Plenk, H., & Stanzl-Tschegg, S. (2001). Influence of Loading frequency on high cycle fatigue properties of b.c.c. and h.c.p. metals. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 308(1–2), 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, P., & Erdogan, F. (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, 85(4), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, D. (2022). A deterministic algorithm for nonlinear, fatigue‐based structural health monitoring. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering.

  • Piriera, H. S. F. G., DuQuesnay, D. L., DeJesus, A. M. P., & Silva, A. L. L. (2009). Analysis of variable amplitude fatigue data of the P355NL1 steel using the effective strain range damage model. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 131(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3147986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirsching, P. H., Albrecht, P., Artley-Dean, M., Ellingwood, B., Schilling, C. G., & Zetrtlemoyer, N. (1982). Fatigue reliability: Variable amplitude loading. Journal of Structural Engineering Division, 108, 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, D., Zhang, W., & Ding, Z. (2022). A modified fatigue damage model considering loading sequence effect. International Journal of Damage Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895221088029

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudip Talukdar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

At instant t = 0, consider the bar is straight and at rest so that displacement and velocity of the bar are given as

$$u\left( {x,0} \right) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{\infty } {\phi_{i} \left( x \right)\eta_{i} \left( 0 \right)}$$
(27)
$$\dot{u}\left( {x,0} \right) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{\infty } {\phi_{i} \left( x \right)\dot{\eta }_{i} \left( 0 \right)}$$
(28)

Multiplying Eqs. (27) and (28) by ϕk(x) and integrating in the domain along with the orthogonality condition of normal modes, one obtains two linear simultaneous equations with unknowns A′ and B′. On solving, constants of integrations are obtained as

$$\begin{aligned} & A_{i}^{\prime } = - \frac{1}{{\omega_{i}^{2} }}\sqrt {\frac{2}{\rho AL}} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{n} {\frac{{P_{j} \sin \phi_{j} }}{{\sqrt {\left( {1 - r_{j}^{2} } \right)^{2} + \left( {2\xi r_{j} } \right)^{2} } }}} \\ & B_{i}^{\prime } = \frac{1}{{\omega_{di} }}\left\{ {\xi_{i} \omega_{i} A_{i}^{\prime} - \frac{1}{{\omega_{i}^{2} }}\sqrt {\frac{2}{\rho AL}} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^{n} {\frac{{P_{j} \omega_{j} \cos \phi_{j} }}{{\sqrt {\left( {1 - r_{j}^{2} } \right)^{2} + \left( {2\xi r_{j} } \right)^{2} } }}} } \right\} \\ \end{aligned}$$
(29)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pillai, A.J., Ahmed, M.H. & Talukdar, S. Fatigue Damage Assessment of Tensile Specimen Considering Opening Stress in Crack Propagation Stage. Int J Steel Struct 23, 1490–1499 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00783-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00783-7

Keywords

Navigation