Abstract
With the ongoing changes in the modern world, the usage of renewable energy sources is increasing. The negative impact of fossil fuels on global warming has led to the search for clean energy sources. Wind energy, which is the most widely used of those sources, is discussed in this study. Numerous studies have been undertaken in this regard, but seismic effects are only newly being considered. In addition to having strong wind zones, Turkey is located in a geographical position through which active fault lines pass. The presence of high wind zones overlapping with these fault lines necessitates seismic analysis for turbines planned to be built in the country. Analysis of wind and seismic load simulation is difficult with traditional structural design programs. In this study, coefficients including wind loads are suggested for civil engineers who plan to analyze wind turbines with only seismic effects. For this purpose, a horizontal axis steel wind turbine with a 5 MW scale is analyzed in this work considering a series of wind and seismic loads in the area around Gelibolu. These environmental effects are evaluated under different operating conditions of the turbine, including normal operation with no earthquake loads, park condition with earthquake loads, idling condition with wind loads, normal operation with earthquake loads, and idling condition with earthquake and wind loads. The full system model of the turbine is developed with the FAST finite element program employing a special code for wind turbines developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. As a result of the analysis, it is concluded that seismic loads acting with the wind significantly change the internal forces. Damping effects occur when seismic and wind loads act at the same time. For this reason, wind loads need to be reduced by a certain coefficient in some cases. Coefficients are proposed here for application in initial designs and load combinations for certain wind and earthquake conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
API (2014). Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed 395 offshore platforms-working stress design foreword.
ASCE-AWEA (2012). Recommended practice for compliance of large onshore wind turbine support 397 structures., ASCE, Reston.
Avassa, A. M., Demartino, C., Cantestabile, P., Ricciardelli, F., & Vicinanza, D. (2017). Some results on the vulnerability assessment of HAWTs subjected to wind and seismic actions. Sustainability, 9(9), 1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091525
Bazeos, N., Hatzigeorgiou, G., Hondros, I., Karamaneas, H., Karabalis, D., & Beskos, D. (2002). Static, seismic and stability analyses of a prototype wind turbine steel tower. Engineering Structures, 24(8), 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00021-4
De Risi, R., Bhattacharya, S., & Goda, K. (2018). Seismic performance assessment of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines using unscaled natural earthquake records. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 109, 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.03.015
Díaz, O., & Suárez, L. E. (2014). Seismic analysis of wind turbines. Earthquake Spectra, 30(2), 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1193/123011EQS316M
Fitzgerald, B., & Biswajit, B. (2017). Seismic analysis of wind turbines. Earthquake Spectra, 30(2), 743–765.
Ghaemmaghami, A. R., Mercan, O., & Kianoush, R. (2016). Seismic soil–structure interaction analysis of wind turbines in frequency domain. Wind Energy, 20(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1995
Gong, K., & Chen, X. (2015). Improved modeling of equivalent static loads on wind turbine towers. Wind and Structures, 20(5), 609–622.
Hau, E., & Von Renouard H. (2003). Wind turbines: fundamentals, technologies, application, economics. Springer: New York.
Hongwang, M. (2012). Seismic analysis for wind turbines including soil-structure interaction com bining vertical and horizontal earthquake. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
IEC (2005). 61400–1; wind turbines—part 1: Design requirements.
Ishihara T., Sarwar M.W. (2008). Numerıcal and theoretıcal study on seısmıc response of wınd turbınes. Proceeding of European Wind Energy Conference.
Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G. (2009). Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development. Report no., National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
Ke, S. T., Xu, L., & Ge, Y. J. (2017). The aerostatic response and stability performance of a wind turbine tower-blade coupled system considering blade shutdown position. Wind and Structures, 25(6), 507–535.
Kim, D. H., Lee, G. N., Lee, Y., & Lee, I. K. (2015). Dynamic reliability analysis of offshore wind turbine support structure under earthquake. Wind and Structures, 21(6), 609–623.
Lloyd, G. (2003). Rules and regulations, iv-non-marine technology, part 1-wind energy., Guide lines for the Certification of Wind Turbines.
Makarios, T. K., Efthymiou, E., & Baniotopoulos, C. C. (2015). On the torsional–translational response of wind turbine structures. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 41(4), 1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1911-7
Patil, A., Jung, S., & Kwon, O.-S. (2016). Structural performance of a parked wind turbine tower subjected to strong ground motions. Engineering Structures, 120, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.020
Prowell, I., Veletzos, M., Elgamal, A., & Restrepo, J. (2008). Shake table test of a 65 kw wind turbine and computational simulation. In 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 12–17.
Prowell, I., & Veers, P. (2009). Assessment of wind turbine seismic risk: Existing literature and simple study of tower moment demand. Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Risø-DNV (2001). Guidelines for design of wind turbines, Vol. Risø-R-1239(EN). Wind Energy Department of Risø National Laboratory and Det Norske Veritas, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sadowski, J. A., Camara, A., Málaga-Chuquitaype, C., & Dai, K. (2019). Seismic analysis of a tall metal wind turbine support tower with realistic geometric imperfections. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2785
Santangelo, F., Failla, G., Santini, A., & Arena, F. (2016). Time-domain uncoupled analyses for seismic assessment of land-based wind turbines. Engineering Structures, 123, 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.043
Sharmin, F., Hussan, M., Kim, D., & Cho, S. G. (2017). Influence of soil-structure interaction on seismic responses of offshore wind turbine considering earthquake incident angle. Engineering Structures., 13(1), 39–50.
Yang, Y., Bashir, M., Li, C., & Wang, J. (2019). Analysis of seismic behaviour of an offshore wind turbine with a flexible foundation. Ocean Engineering, 178, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.02.077
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Altunsu, E., Gunes, O. & Sarı, A. Design Principles for Wind Turbine Earthquake and Wind Load Combinations. Int J Steel Struct 22, 791–804 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-022-00606-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-022-00606-1