Skip to main content
Log in

Bilinear Load–Displacement Curve of Semi-supported Steel Shear Walls

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elastic stiffness and ultimate shear capacity are two main parameters of a structural system to obtain its ideal bilinear load–displacement. In the previous studies, the ultimate shear capacity of semi-supported steel shear walls (SSSW) which are a new lateral resisting system, has been determined. In this system, wall plates do not have any direct connection to the main columns of structure and they are connected to secondary columns which do not carry the gravity loads. The used thin plate in the SSSW elastically buckles at low levels of lateral loads and the wall plate stays on a fairly vast region with elastic post-buckling behavior (elastic stiffness). In this study, the Von-Karman plate equations are solved by the Galerkin method to find displacement field of the wall plate in the elastic post-buckling region as well as the maximum shear load after which the plasticity expand in the wall plate. Thus, the elastic stiffness of system is calculated. As the analytical procedure is complicated, the method is applied on 144 examples with different material and geometrical properties. Using linear regression technique, a concise formula is proposed to predict the elastic stiffness of system. The dimensions of wall plate are only the effective parameters in the suggested formula and the elastic stiffness is independent of the overturning moment, section of secondary columns and yield stress of material. Using the ultimate shear capacity and elastic stiffness, an ideal bilinear curve is obtained for the lateral load versus the horizontal displacement. The shear capacity at the end of elastic post-buckling region and out of plane displacement are acceptably validated with those of FE analysis for some examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the usual SSSWs, the aspect ratio, \(r = \frac{h}{b}\) is between 0.8 and 1.5. Thus, the symmetric shear buckling occurs in the wall plate.

Abbreviations

b :

Width of wall plate

b f :

Width of flange of UNP section

c :

Constant parameter in the displacement field equation

d :

Height of UNP section

\(f_{y}\) :

Yield stress of material of wall plate

h :

Height of storey (SSSW)

k e :

Elastic stiffness of SSSW

k s :

Out of plane stiffness of the distributed linear springs

m :

Number of the half waves in the tension field direction

r :

Aspect ratio of wall plate

t :

Thickness of wall plate

u :

Component of displacement field in x-direction

u s :

Horizontal displacement of top of wall plate

v :

Component of displacement field in y-direction

w :

Component of displacement field in z-direction

w c :

Absolute deflection of center of wall plate

\(\bar{w}\) :

Deflection function without the unknown parameter

A :

Unknown parameter in the deflection function

A c :

Cross sectional area of secondary column

D :

Bending rigidity of wall plate

E :

Modulus of elasticity of wall plate in tension and compression

F :

Airy’s stress function

\(F_{h} ,F_{p}\) :

Homogenous and particular solutions of Airy’s stress function equation, respectively

G :

Modulus of elasticity of wall plate in shear

\(I_{s}\) :

Moment of inertia of SSSW section about an axis parallel to z axis and passing of middle of section

I xx :

Moment of inertia of secondary column about x-axis

I zz :

Moment of inertia of secondary column about z-axis

L :

Length of span that has SSSW

\(M_{s}\) :

Overturning moment of storey

\(M_{x} , M_{y}\) :

Bending moments per unit length of section of the wall plate perpendicular to x and y axes, respectively

\(M_{xy}\) :

Twisting moment per unit length of section of the wall plate perpendicular to x axis

\(M_{y,in}\) :

In-plane bending moment that varies in y-direction

V fy :

Upper limit of shear load to yield the first point of wall plate

\(V_{s}\) :

Shear force of storey

V u :

Ultimate shear force of wall plate

V x :

Shearing force parallel to z axis per unit length of section of the wall plate perpendicular to x axis

\(\alpha\) :

Constant value to adjust the inclination of tension field

\(\beta \left( y \right)\) :

Function to y to show the out of plane deflection of secondary columns

\(\nu\) :

Poisson’s ratio of wall plate

\(\sigma_{e}\) :

Stress intensity (Von-Mises stress)

\(\sigma_{x}\) :

In-plane stress in x-direction

\(\sigma_{y}\) :

In-plane stress in y-direction

\(\tau\) :

In-plane shearing stress

References

  • Alavi, E., & Nateghi, F. (2013). Experimental study on diagonally stiffened steel plate shear walls with central perforation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,89, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, H., & Bulson, P. (1980). Background to buckling. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiri, B., AghaRezaei, H., & Esmaeilabadi, R. (2018). The effect of diagonal stiffeners on the behaviour of stiffened steel plate shear wall. Journal of Computational Engineering and Physical Modeling,1(1), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/AISC 341-16. (2016). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astaneh-Asl, A. (2001). Seismic behavior and design of steel shear walls. Steel tips reports.

  • Astaneh-Asl, A., & Zhao, Q. (2000). Cyclic tests of steel shear walls. Berkeley: Department of Civil and Engineering, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrebar, M., Kabir, M., Zirakian, T., Hajsadeghi, M., & Lim, J. (2016). Structural performance assessment of trapezoidally corrugated and centrally perforated steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,122, 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, M., Rosmanit, M., & Hofmeyer, H. (2007). Elastic post-buckling analysis of compressed plates using a two-strip model. Thin-Walled Structures,45(5), 502–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmick, A., Grondin, G., & Driver, R. (2011). Estimating fundamental periods of steel plate shear walls. Engineering Structures,33(6), 1883–1893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmick, A., Grondin, G., & Driver, R. (2014). Nonlinear seismic analysis of perforated steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,94, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boresi, A. (2003). Advanced mechanics of materials (6th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byklum, E., & Amdahl, J. (2002). A simplified method for elastic large deflection analysis of plates and stiffened panels due to local buckling. Thin-Walled Structures,40(11), 925–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chajes, A. (1974). Principles of structural stability theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Jhang, C. (2011). Experimental study of low yield point steel plate shear wall under in-plane load. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,67(6), 977–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I., & Park, H. (2008). Ductility and energy dissipation capacity of shear-dominated steel plate walls. Journal of Structural Engineering,134(9), 1495–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P., Berman, J., & Lowes, L. (2015). Seismic performance of self-centering steel plate shear walls with beam-only-connected web plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,106, 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H., Yue, X., & Atluri, S. (2014). Solutions of the Von-Kármán plate equations by a Galerkin method without inverting the tangent stiffness matrix. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures,9(2), 195–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Grondin, G., Behbahanifard, M., & Hussain, M. (2001). Recent developments and future directions in steel plate shear wall research. In NASCC proceedings.

  • Driver, R., Kulak, G., Elwi, A., & Kennedy, D. (1998a). FE and simplified models of steel plate shear wall. Journal of Structural Engineering,124(2), 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Kulak, G., Kennedy, D., & Elwi, A. (1998b). Cyclic test of four-story steel plate shear wall. Journal of Structural Engineering,124(2), 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emami, F., Mofid, M., & Vafai, A. (2013). Experimental study on cyclic behavior of trapezoidally corrugated steel shear walls. Engineering Structures,48, 750–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzampour, A., Jeffrey, A., & Mofid, M. (2015). Behavior prediction of corrugated steel plate shear walls with openings. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,114, 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, P., & Virtuoso, F. (2014). Semi-analytical models for the post-buckling analysis and ultimate strength prediction of isotropic and orthotropic plates under uniaxial compression with the unloaded edges free from stresses. Thin-Walled Structures,82, 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., Wang, F., & Bruneau, M. (2017). Diagonal tension field inclination angle in steel plate shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering,143(7), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., Hao, J., & Liu, Y. (2015). Behavior of stiffened and unstiffened steel plate shear walls considering joint properties. Thin-Walled Structures,97, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H., Li, Y., Liang, G., & Liu, Y. (2017a). Experimental study of cross stiffened steel plate shear wall with semi-rigid connected frame. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,135, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, L., Rong, Q., Qu, B., & Liu, J. (2017b). Testing of steel plate shear walls with composite columns and infill plates connected to beams only. Engineering Structures,136, 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami, F., Ghamari, A., & Rahai, A. (2012). Investigating the properties of steel shear walls reinforced with carbon fiber polymers (CFRP). Journal of Constructional Steel Research,70, 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoseinzadeh-Asl, M., & Safarkhani, M. (2017). Seismic behavior of steel plate shear wall with reduced boundary beam section. Thin-Walled Structures,116, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinzadeh, S., & Tehranizadeh, M. (2012). Introduction of stiffened large rectangular openings in steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,77, 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui-shen, S. (1989). Post buckling behavior of rectangular plates under combined loading. Thin-Walled Structures,8(3), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanpour, A., Jönsson, J., & Moharrami, H. (2012). Seismic behavior of semi-supported steel shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,74, 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanpour, A., & Moharrami, H. (2015). Evaluation of behavior of the secondary columns in semi-supported steel shear walls. Thin-Walled Structures,93, 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanpour, A., Moharrami, H., & Aghakoochak, A. (2011). Evaluation of ultimate capacity of semi-supported steel shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,67, 1022–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., Tsai, K., Huang, Y., & Tsai, C. (2017). Cyclic tests of steel plate shear walls using box-shape vertical boundary elements with or without infill concrete. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,46(14), 2537–2564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijušković, O., Ćorić, B., & Pavlović, M. (1999). Transverse-stiffener requirements for the post-buckling Behavior of a plate in shear. Thin-Walled Structures,34(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moharrami, H., Habibnejad, A., Mazrouei, A., & Alizadeh, H. (2006). Semi-supported thin steel shear walls. Tehran: The Building and Housing Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moharrami, H., & Jahanpour, A. (2016). Limit analysis and design of semi-supported steel shear walls. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University Press. (In Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paik, J., Thayamballi, A., Lee, S., & Kang, S. (2001). A semi-analytical method for the elastic-plastic lrge deflection analysis of welded steel or aluminum plating under combined in-plane and lateral pressure loads. Thin-Walled Structures,39(2), 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., Kwack, J., Jeon, S., & Choi, I. (2007). Framed steel plate wall behavior under cyclic lateral loading. Journal of Structural Engineering,133(3), 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelli, R., & Bruneau, M. (2007). Design guide 20. Chicago, IL: Steel Plate Shear Walls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabouri-Ghomi, S., & Asad Sajjadi, S. (2012). Experimental and theoretical studies of steel shear walls with and without stiffeners. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,75, 152–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabouri-Ghomi, S., & Mamazizi, S. (2015). Experimental investigation on stiffened steel plate shear walls with two rectangular openings. Thin-Walled Structures,86, 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabouri-Ghomi, S., Ventura, C., & Kharrazi, M. (2005). Shear analysis and design of ductile steel plate walls. Journal of Structural Engineering,131(6), 878–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekastehband, B., Azaraxsh, A., & Showkati, H. (2017a). Experimental and numerical study on seismic behavior of LYS and HYS steel plate shear walls connected to frame beams only. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering,17(1), 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekastehband, B., Azaraxsh, A., & Showkati, H. (2018). Experimental seismic study on shear walls with fully-connected and beam-only-connected web plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,141, 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekastehband, B., Azaraxsh, A., Showkati, H., & Pavir, A. (2017b). Behavior of semi-supported steel shear walls: experimental and numerical simulations. Engineering Structures,135, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simulia, D. S. (2010). Abaqus 6.10 analysis user’s guide. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatelos, D., Labeas, G., & Tserpes, K. (2011). Analytical calculation of local buckling and post-buckling behavior of isotropic and orthotropic stiffened panels. Thin-Walled Structures,49(3), 422–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G., Kennedy, D., & Williams, F. (2000). A post-buckling analysis for isotropic prismatic plate assemblies under axial compression. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences,42(9), 1783–1803.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Topkaya, C., & Atasoy, M. (2009). Lateral stiffness of steel plate shear wall systems. Thin-walled Structures,47(8–9), 827–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valizadeh, H., Sheidaii, M., & Showkati, H. (2012). Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of perforated steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,70, 308–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Ou, M., & Wang, T. (1991). Post-buckling behavior of orthotropic rectangular plates. Computers & Structures,41(1), 1–5.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Shi, Y., Xu, J., Yang, W., & Li, Y. (2015). Experimental and numerical study of unstiffened steel plate shear wall structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,112, 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, M., Liew, J., Yong, D., & Fu, X. (2017). Experimental and numerical investigation of novel partially connected steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,132, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., & Martinez, J. (2006). Strength and stiffness determination of shear wall panels in cold-formed steel framing. Thin-Walled Structures,44(10), 1084–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, M., & Lu, L. (1994). Interaction of infilled steel shear wall panels with surrounding frame members. In Proceedings of annual task group technical session, structural stability research council: reports on current research activities.

  • Yukio, U., Rashed, S., & Paik, J. (1987). An incremental Galerkin method for plates and stiffened plates. Computers & Structures,27(1), 147–156.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zirakian, T., & Zhang, J. (2015). Structural performance of unstiffened low yield point steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,112, 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Jahanpour.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Influence of β on the Out of Plane Deflection of Secondary Column

Appendix: Influence of β on the Out of Plane Deflection of Secondary Column

The initial deflection function is defined with Eq. (7) in which a parameter, β is used to consider the out of plane deflection of secondary columns. Then, using the second part of Eqs. (4) and (5), Eq. (8) is obtained to determine \(\beta = \beta \left( y \right)\). To find the maximum deflection of the secondary columns, the absolute maximum and minimum of \(\beta\) must be obtained. Then in Eq. (8):

$$\frac{d\beta }{dy} = 0$$
(59)

As \(\beta\) is dependent to Eq. (6) and it is a two criteria function, Eq. (60) is obtained which has two parts in the right side. Each part must be separately solved to achieve the positions of extremum points.

$$3\tan \frac{m\alpha \pi y}{h} + \frac{m\alpha \pi y}{h} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {0;} \hfill & {0 \le \frac{y}{h} \le \frac{1}{2}} \hfill \\ {m\alpha \pi ; } \hfill & { \frac{1}{2} \le \frac{y}{h} \le 1} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right.$$
(60)

These equations do not have a closed form solution and must be numerically solved. The solution leads to some acceptable answers such as \(\lambda_{i} = \frac{{y_{i} }}{h}\) and the maximum and minimum of β are obtained as:

$$\beta_{i}^{max/min} = \frac{{\pi^{3} t^{3} r}}{{576I_{xx} \left( {1 - \nu^{2} } \right)}}\left[ {r^{2} \left( {1 + 3m^{2} } \right) + 2 - \nu } \right]\sin \left( {m\alpha \pi \lambda_{i} } \right) \times \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\lambda_{i}^{3} ;} \hfill & {0 \le \lambda_{i} \le \frac{1}{2}} \hfill \\ {\left( {1 - \lambda_{i} } \right)^{3} ; } \hfill & { \frac{1}{2} \le \lambda_{i} \le 1} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right.$$
(61)

Supposing that \(m = 3\), \(\alpha = 1.3\) and \(\nu = 0.3\), Table 7 shows the acceptable answers in the defined domains and the corresponding \(\beta\) s for some models which is defined in Table 1. Table 7 shows that the absolute maximum and minimum values of \(\beta\) are 1925.16 × 10−8 and − 3501.53 × 10−8 respectively. As seen in Eq. (62) which shows the deflection of wall plate center, the maximum/minimum value of \(\beta\) has negligible effect on the \(w\left( {\frac{b}{2},\frac{h}{2}} \right)\). It can be easily shown that for the other points, the values of \(\beta\) are ignorable and out of plane deflection of secondary columns is approximately zero.

$$w\left( {\frac{b}{2},\frac{h}{2}} \right) = A\left[ { - \sin \left( {0.45\pi } \right) + \beta_{i}^{max/min} } \right]$$
(62)
Table 7 The maximum and minimum of \(\beta\) in Eq. (7)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadat Kholerdi, S.E., Jahanpour, A. Bilinear Load–Displacement Curve of Semi-supported Steel Shear Walls. Int J Steel Struct 20, 504–524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00301-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00301-8

Keywords

Navigation