Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the Influence of Connection Configuration on Composite Joints

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steel–concrete composite joints possess higher bearing capacity, initial stiffness and redundancy than bare steel joints. The configuration of beam-column connection would influence the behavior of composite joints, such as rigidity, rotation capacity and so on. In this paper, the test of two fully welded rigid composite joints and two flush endplate semi-rigid composite joints was introduced. The loading conditions in the tests involved sagging moment and hogging moment. The mechanical behavior of composite joints under bending moment was studied in detail, especially on the influence of connection configuration. The test results indicated that the experimental phenomena and failure mode of fully welded composite joint and flush endplate composite joint under hogging moment were similar to each other. The buckling of bottom flange of steel beam determined the behavior of composite joint under hogging moment, such as initial stiffness and bending strength. It indicated that using flush endplate connection instead of fully welded connection in composite joints had little influence on the behavior of the joint under service loads if the failure mode of joints is governed by the same component. Four models for moment-rotation relation of composite joints are compared with experimental results. Based on the comparison, a new combination model of power function expression and linear expression is developed. With proper optimum shape parameter and descending stiffness, the new model could present the moment-rotation relation of composite joints, regardless of connection configuration or loading condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attigobe, E., & Morris, G. (1991). Moment-rotation functions for steel connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 117(6), 1703–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernuzzi, C., Zandonini, R., & Zanon, P. (1996). Experimental analysis and modeling of semi-rigid steel joints under cyclic reversal loading. Journal of Constructral Steel Research, 38(2), 95–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calado, L., Proenca, J. M., Espinha, M., et al. (2013). Hysteretic behavior of dissipative welded fuses for earthquake resistant composite steel and concrete frames. Steel and Composite Structures, 14(14), 547–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 3. (2003). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1.8: Design of Joints, prEN1993-1-8, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Eurocode 4. (2004). Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures, Part 1.8: Design of joints, prEN1994-1-1, European Committe for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Eurocode 8. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, prEN1998-1, European Committe for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Fu, F., Lam, D., & Ye, J. Q. (2008). Modelling semi-rigid composite joints with precast hollow core slabs in hogging moment region. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64(12), 1408–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, B., & Bayo, E. (2008). An alternative design for internal and external semi-rigid composite joints Part I: Experimental research. Engineering Structures, 30(1), 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T., Leon, T. R., & Rassati, G. A. (2004). Bidirectional tests on partially restrained, composite beam-to-column connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(2), 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Shi, W. L., & Ye, Z. M. (2010). Moment-rotation relation research on beam-to-column compsite joints. Progress in Steel Building Structure, 12(2), 13–22 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspart, J. P., & Weynand, K. (2016). Design of joints in steel and composite structures. ECCS eurocode design manuals. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Han, L. H. (2011). Seismic performance of CFST column to steel beam joints with RC slab. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(1), 127–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Astaneh-Asl, A. (2004). Moment-rotation parameters for composite shear tab connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(9), 1371–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, H. Y., Uy, B., & Bradford, M. A. (2006). The effects of partial shear connection in composite flush end plate joints Part I: Experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(4), 378–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J. G., Qin, K., & Cai, C. S. (2008). Seismic behavior of connections composed of CFSSTCs and steel-concrete composite beams experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64(10), 1178–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard Liew, J. Y., Teo, T. H., Shanmugam, N. E., et al. (2000). Testing of steel-concrete composite connections and appraisal of results. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 56, 117–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, W. L., Li, G. Q., Xiao, Y., & Ye, Z. M. (2008). Cyclic loading tests on composite beam-to-column joints with semi-rigid connections. Journal of Building Structures, 29(5), 57–66 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y. J., Su, D., & Wang, Y. Q. (2006). An experimental study on the seismic performance of beam-to-column joints in steel frames with the effect of concrete slabs considered. Journal of Building Structures, 39(9), 26–31 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoes da Silva, L., Simoes, R. D., & Cruz, P. (2001). Experimental behavior of end-plate beam-to-column composite joints under monotonical loading. Engineering Structures, 23, 1383–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. F., Han, L. H., & Uy, B. (2009). Behavior of flush end plate joints to concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(4), 925–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. F., Zhang, H. J., & Jiang, Z. (2016). Seismic behavior of blind bolted end plate composite joints to CFTST columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 108, 256–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., Choo, B. S., & Nethercot, D. A. (1994). Composite connections in steel and concrete I: Experimental behavior of composite beam-column-connection. Journal of Construction Steel Research, 31(5), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., Tan, K. H., & Xiong, G. (2015). Behaviour of composite beam–column joints under a middle-column-removal scenario: Component-based modelling. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 104, 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., & Tan, K. H. (2013). Structural behavior of RC beam-column subassemblages under a middle column removal scenario. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 139(2), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project is supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0701203), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622965), Chongqing Postdoctoral Special Foundation (Xm2017095), Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (17JK1154) and Xijing University Special Foundation (XJ17T07), which are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shan Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, S., Guo, L. Study on the Influence of Connection Configuration on Composite Joints. Int J Steel Struct 18, 1048–1062 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0045-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0045-7

Keywords

Navigation