Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Local stakeholder perceptions of forest degradation: Keys to sustainable tropical forest management

  • Tackling Risks through the Sustainable Development Goals
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land use policies and planning in Latin America have been partially successful in halting deforestation yet have not stopped forest degradation. Here, we study the different stakeholders’ perspectives of the drivers of forest degradation. We use Colombia as a case study for understanding synergies and trade-offs of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and analyzed what the most important causes are, to whom it matters, and their regional contribution. We identified a common perception, but miscommunication and misunderstandings occur between local- and national-level actors in terms of their views on responsibilities and rates of change. The results are a call for action. Cross-scale governance is necessary to improve the design and implementation of policies for forest management at the subnational and local levels and to ensure that we move toward sustainable development without worsening existing inequalities. It is essential that countries provide the enabling conditions to develop a coherent governing framework.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://leyes.senado.gov.co/proyectos/images/documentos/Textos%20Radicados/proyectos%20de%20ley/2021%20-%202022/PL%20128-21%20Incendios.pdf.

References

  • Andela, N., D.C. Morton, L. Giglio, Y. Chen, G.R. Van Der Werf, P.S. Kasibhatla, R.S. DeFries, G.J. Collatz, et al. 2017. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science 356: 1356–1362. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armenteras, D., E. Cabrera, N. Rodríguez, and J. Retana. 2013b. National and regional determinants of tropical deforestation in Colombia. Regional Environmental Change 13: 1181–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0433-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenteras, D., T.M. González, and S. Barreto. 2018b. Fuegos y áreas protegidas de la Amazonia Colombiana: Cambio en los motores de deforestación. Revista Colombia Amazonica 11: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenteras, D., T.M. González, M. Meza, J.P. Ramírez-Delgado, E. Cabrera, G. Galindo, A. Yepes. 2018a. Causas de degradación forestal en Colombia: una primera aproximación.

  • Armenteras, D., P. Negret, L.F. Melgarejo, T.M. Lakes, M.C. Londoño, J. García, T. Krueger, M. Baumann, et al. 2019. Curb land grabbing to save the Amazon. Nature Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1020-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenteras, D., N. Rodríguez, and J. Retana. 2013a. Landscape dynamics in Northwestern Amazonia: an assessment of pastures, fire and illicit crops as drivers of tropical deforestation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenteras, D., N. Rodríguez, J. Retana, and M. Morales. 2011. Understanding deforestation in montane and lowland forests of the Colombian Andes. Regional Environmental Change 11: 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0200-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenteras, D., G. Rudas, N. Rodríguez, S. Sua, and M. Romero. 2006. Patterns and causes of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon. Ecological Indicators 6: 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J., G.D. Lennox, J. Ferreira, E. Berenguer, A.C. Lees, R. Mac Nally, J.R. Thomson, S. F. de B. Ferraz, et al. 2016. Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535: 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Budiharta, S., E. Meijaard, P.D. Erskine, C. Rondinini, M. Pacifici, and K.A. Wilson. 2014. Restoring degraded tropical forests for carbon and biodiversity. Environmental Research Letters 9: 114020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante, M.M.C., I. Roitman, T.M. Aide, A. Alencar, L. Anderson, L. Aragão, G.P. Asner, J. Barlow, et al. 2015. Towards an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etter, A., C. Mcalpine, S. Phinn, D. Pullar, and H. Possingham. 2006a. Characterizing a tropical deforestation wave: a dynamic spatial analysis of a deforestation hotspot in the Colombian Amazon. Global Change Biology 12: 1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01168.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etter, A., C. McAlpine, K. Wilson, S. Phinn, and H. Possingham. 2006b. Regional patterns of agricultural land use and deforestation in Colombia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 114: 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, E. 2010. Evaluación de los recursos forestales mundiales 2010 Informe principal.

  • FAO. 2020. El estado de los bosques del mundo 2020a. El Estado De Los Bosques Del Mundo. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642es.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2020b. Global Forest Resources Assessment.

  • Franco, M.F., and J.A. Moreno. 2019. The relationship between social groups and the forest: an anlysis using Ostrom’s principles. Revista De Investigación Agraría y Ambiental 10: 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furumo, P.R., and E.F. Lambin. 2020. Scaling up zero-deforestation initiatives through public-private partnerships: a look inside post-conflict Colombia. Global Environmental Change 62: 102055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzón, N.V., C.H. Rodríguez León, E. Ceccon, and D.R. Pérez. 2020. Ecological restoration-based education in the Colombian Amazon: toward a new society–nature relationship. Restoration Ecology 28: 1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDEAM, IGAC, IAvH, INVEMAR, SINCHI, IIAP. 2007. Ecosistemas continentales, costeros y marinos de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras José Benito Vives de Andréis, Ins.

  • IDEAM, MINAMBIENTE, Visión Amazonía, Corazón de la Amazonía, Forests 2020, and P. ONU-REDD. 2018. Resultados Monitoreo de la deforestación 2017. Resultados Monitoreo De La Deforestación 2017: 47.

  • Kissinger, G., M. Herold, and V. De Sy. 2012. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation.

  • Lund, G. 2009. What is a degraded forest? https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4319.7283.

  • Nations, U. 2021. Goal 15 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

  • Olson, J.S., J.A. Watts, and L.J. Allison. 1983. Carbon in live vegetation of major world ecosystems. ORNL-5862, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge

  • Osuri, A.M., J. Ratnam, V. Varma, P. Alvarez-Loayza, J. Hurtado Astaiza, M. Bradford, C. Fletcher, M. Ndoundou-Hockemba, et al. 2016. Contrasting effects of defaunation on aboveground carbon storage across the global tropics. Nature Communications 7: 11351. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peres, C.A., T. Emilio, J. Schietti, S.J.M.M. Desmoulière, and T. Levi. 2016. Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 892–897. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516525113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Querol, C. 2002. Gobernanza para un desarrollo sostenible en Cataluña Conceptos , requerimientos institucionales y elementos de análisis.

  • R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Reid, J., and W.C. De Sousa. 2005. Infrastructure and conservation policy in Brazil. Conservation Biology 19: 740–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00699.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinne, F.N., J. Burns, P. Kant, M.D. Flannigan, M. Kleine, B. de Groot, D.M. Wotton. 2018. Global fire challenges in a warming world. IUFRO

  • Rodríguez, N., D. Armenteras, and J. Retana. 2013. Effectiveness of protected areas in the Colombian Andes: deforestation, fire and land-use changes. Regional Environmental Change 13: 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0356-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Eraso, N., D. Armenteras-Pascual, J.R. Alumbreros, J. Retana-Alumbreros, and J.R. Alumbreros. 2013. Land use and land cover change in the Colombian Andes: dynamics and future scenarios. Journal of Land Use Science 8: 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2011.650228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Piñeros, S., O. Martínez-Cortés, L. Villarraga-Flórez, and A. Ruíz-Díaz. 2018. Timber market actors’ values on forest legislation: a case study from Colombia. Forest Policy and Economics 88: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-ruiz, M.H., S.G.A. Flantua, K. Tansey, and J.C. Berrio. 2011. Landscape transformations in savannas of northern South America: land use/cover changes since 1987 in the Llanos Orientales of Colombia. Applied Geography 32: 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, N., G.P. Asner, W. Knorr, P.B. Durst, H.R. Priyadi, and F.E. Putz. 2011. Approaches to classifying and restoring degraded tropical forests for the anticipated REDD+ climate change mitigation mechanism. iForest Biogeosciences and Forestry 4: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0556-004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, N., and F.E. Putz. 2009. Critical need for new definitions of “forest” and “forest degradation” in global climate change agreements. Conservation Letters 2: 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00067.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, C. 2011. Gobernanza para el desarrollo económico territorial en américa latina.

  • Seymour, F., and N.L. Harris. 2019. Reducing tropical deforestation. Science 365: 756–757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax8546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simula, M. 2009. Hacia Una Definición De Degradación De Los Bosques: Análisis Comparativo De Las Definiciones Existentes. 154. Evaluación de los recursos forestales mundiales Documento de trabajo 154.

  • Thompson, I.D., M.R. Guariguata, K. Okabe, C. Bahamondez, R. Nasi, V. Heymell, and C. Sabogal. 2013. An operational framework for defining and monitoring forest degradation. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05443-180220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, G., and H. Ramos. 2008. Gobernanza y territorios: notas para la implementación de políticas para el desarrollo. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Políticas y Sociales L 203: 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First of all we would like to thank all the participants from community-based organizations (farmers and indigenous and Afro-descendants), foresters, public entities, natural resource management authorities, municipalities, regional governments, academics and professionals from non-profit organizations (NGOs) that kindly answered the surveys. This work is a continuation of the information collected through the contract No. 2302831 2016 between UNAL and the United Nations for Food and Agriculture – FAO, and as such we would like to thank the Colombia UN-REDD programme and the Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies of Colombia – IDEAM who initially supported part of this research. We are grateful to A. Yepes from FAO and E. Cabrera from IDEAM. We finally thank Sam Staddon for her comments on an early draft and Thomas Defler for the English revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dolors Armenteras.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1650 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Armenteras, D., González-Delgado, T.M., González-Trujillo, J.D. et al. Local stakeholder perceptions of forest degradation: Keys to sustainable tropical forest management. Ambio 52, 733–742 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01797-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01797-x

Keywords

Navigation