Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variability comparison of cultured Israeli carp (Cyprinus carpio) from Korea using microsatellites

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genes & Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In aquaculture, cultured fish often undergo continuous cross-fertilization without any inflow of new broodstock. This lowers genetic diversity, leading to increased disease rates and decreased survival rates. To improve the mass production and easy culture of Israeli carp, it is essential to investigate the population structure and genetic diversity of these fish. However, such a survey has not yet been performed on Korean Israeli carp. In this study, we used seven microsatellite markers to analyze the genetic diversity and association of cultured Israeli carp from Korea and China. The average numbers of alleles per locus (N A ) for two Korean (KorA and KorB) and two Chinese (ChA and ChB) populations were as follows: KorA (10.42), KorB (14.43), ChA (20.57) and ChB (20.71). The expected heterozygosity (H e ) ranged from 0.672 to 0.897 and from 0.827 to 0.938 in the Korean sample and Chinese sample respectively. The genetic diversity of the Korean Israeli carp was about half that of the Chinese carp. The diversity of the Korean Israeli carp was very low, suggesting that the immunity of this population could be weak, and that diversity–recovery studies are urgently needed. Therefore, our results may therefore form the foundation for future research efforts towards genetic monitoring and selective breeding, continuous research needs to be conducted in order to recover the genetic diversity of the Korean Israeli carp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam MS, Islam MS (2005) Population genetic structure of Catla catla (Hamilton) revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. Aquaculture 2426:151–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alfred WC (1982) Stock improvement of the common carp in Hong Kong through hybridization with the introduced Israeli race ‘DOR-70’. Aquaculture 29:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Ryman N (1987) Genetic management of hatchery stocks. In: Ryman N, Utter FM (eds) Population genetics and fishery management. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 141–159

    Google Scholar 

  • An HS, Lee JW, Dong CM (2012) Population genetic structure of Korean pen shell (Atrina pectinata) in Korea inferred from microsatellite marker analysis. Genes Genom 34:681–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beardmore AL, Mair CG, Lewis CG (1997) Biodiversity in aquatic systems in relation to aquaculture. Aquaculture 28:829–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biba A, Hoda A, Vardhami E, Bozgo V (2015a) Genetic diversity of common carp from Shkodra Lake based on microsatellite markers. Livestock Res Rural Dev 27. http://lrrd.org/lrrd27/4/biba27079.html

  • Carlsson J, Morrison CL, Reece KS (2006) Wild and aquaculture populations of the eastern oyster compared using microsatellites. J Hered 97:595–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32:550–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooijmans RPMA., Bierbooms VAF, Komen J, VanderPoel JJ, Groenen MAM (1997) Microsatellite markers in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L). Anim Genet 28:129–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eknath AE, Doyle RW (1990) Effective population size and rate of inbreeding in aquaculture of Indian major carps. Genetics in aquaculture III. Aquaculture 85:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghelichpour M, Shabani A, Shabanpour B (2013) Microsatellite variations and genetic structure of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) population in Gomishan bay and Gorgonroud River (South East of Caspian Sea). Int J Acquat Biol 1:22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde B, Gunnes K, Gjedrem T (1983) Effects of inbreeding on survival and growth in rainbow trout. Aquaculture 34:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html

  • Hulak M, Kaspar V, Kohlmann K, Coward K, Tešitel J, Rodina M, Gela D, Kocour M, Linhart O (2010) Microsatellite-based genetic diversity and differentiation of foreign common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains farmed in the Czech Republic. Aquaculture 298:194–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JE, Lee YM, Lee JH, Noh JK, Kim HC, Park CJ, Park JW, Kim KK (2014) Development and validation of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers from an expressed sequence tag (EST) database in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Dev Reprod 18:275–286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid HL (1983) Inbreeding in fish populations used for aquaculture. Aquaculture 33:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann K, Gross R, Murakaeva A, Kersten P (2003) Genetic variability and structure of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) populations throughout the distribution range inferred from allozyme, microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Aquat Living Resour 16:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann K, Kersten P, Flajšhans M (2005) Microsatellite-based genetic variabilityand differentiation of domesticated, wild and feral common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) populations. Aquaculture 247:253–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JG, Kim HC (2013) Parasites found from Israel carp (Cyprinus carpio nudus) in Korea. J Vet Sci 49:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehoczky I, Magyary I, Hancz C, Weiss S (2005) Preliminary studies on the geneticvariability of six Hungarian common carp strains using microsatellite DNA markers. Hydrobiologia 533:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Kang D, Yin Q, Sun X, Liang L (2007) Microsatellite DNA marker analysis of genetic diversity in wild common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) populations. J Genet Genom 34:984–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li CT, Zhang YY, Jia ZY, Hu XS, Shi LY (2009) Comparative studies on measurable characters and the number of scales in Songpu mirror carp and German mirror carp selection strain (F4). Chin J Fish 22:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao XL, Yu XM, Tong J (2006) Genetic diversity of common carp from two largest Chinese lakes and the Yangtze River revealed by microsatellite markers. Hydrobiologia 568:445–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZJ, Cordes JF (2004) DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture 238:1–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma HY, Yue YS, Guo JF, Gong WH, Wang H (2006) Microsatellite marker analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in three populations of Cyprinus carpio L. Shandong Province. J Lake Sci 18:655–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin H, Kaspar V, Kohlmann K, Coward K, Tešitel J, Rodina M, Gela D, Kocour M, Linhart O (2010) Microsatellite-based genetic diversity and differentiation of foreign common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains farmed in the Czech Republic. Aquaculture 298:194–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moav R (1976) Genetic improvement in aquaculture industry. FAO Technical Conference on Aquaculture, Kyoto, Japan, vol R9, p 23

  • Mondol MRK, Islamz MS, Alam MS (2006) Characterization of different strains of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) (Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes) in Bangladesh using microsatellite DNA markers. Genet Mol Biol 29:626–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris AT, Bradley DG, Cunningham EP (1999) Microsatellite genetic variation between and within farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations. Aquaculture 180:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh MJ, Jung SJ, Choi TJ, Kim HR, Rajendran KV, Kim YJ, Park MA, Chun SK (2001) A viral disease occurring in cultured carp Cyprinus carpio in Korea. Fish Pathol 36:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajts F, Huntington T, Hussain MG (2002) Carp broodstock management and genetic improvement program under Fourth Fisheries Project. In: Penman DJ, HussainMG, McAndrew BJ, Mazid MA (eds) Genetic management and improvement of exotic carp species in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Mymensingh, pp 95–106

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP population genetic software for exact test of ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ‘007 a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutten MJM, Komen H, Deerenberg RM, Siwek M, Bovenhuis H (2004) Genetic characterization of four strains of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) using microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 35:93–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thai BT, Burridge CP, Austin CM (2007) Genetic diversity of common carp (Cyprinuscarpio L.) in Vietnam using four microsatellite loci. Aquaculture 269:174–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thrower F, Guthrie C, Nielsen J, Joyce J (2004) A comparison of genetic variation between an anadromous steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, population and seven derived populations sequestered in freshwater for 70 years. Environ Biol Fisches 69:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber JL, May PE (1989) Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain-reaction. Am J Hum Genet 44:388–396

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfarth GW, Moav R, Hulata G (1983) A genotype-interaction for growth rate in the common carp, growing in intensively manured ponds. Aquaculture 33:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue GH, Orban L (2001) Rapid Isolation of DNA from fresh and preserved fish scales for polymerase chain reaction. Mar Biotechnol 3:199–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu ZY, Lin G, Lo LC, Xu YX, Renee C, Yue GH (2006) Genetic analyses of Asian seabass stocks using novel polymorphic microsatellites. Aquaculture 256:167–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Fisheries Science (R2017003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong-Ho Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All experiments were carried out in accordance with the regulation approved by National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI, South Korea).

Conflict of interest

Jung Eun Kim declares that there is no conflict of interest. In Bon Goo declares that there is no conflict of interest. Ju-ae Hwang declares that there is no conflict of interest. Hyeong Su Kim declares that there is no conflict of interest. Hye-Sung Choi declares that there is no conflict of interest. Jeong-Ho Lee declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1085 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.E., Goo, I.B., Hwang, Ja. et al. Genetic variability comparison of cultured Israeli carp (Cyprinus carpio) from Korea using microsatellites. Genes Genom 40, 635–642 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0663-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0663-7

Keywords

Navigation