Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Joint Recapture and Recovery Models

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diagnostic goodness-of-fit tests for capture–recapture models are routinely used prior to model fitting and analysis. However, when data include a mixture of live recaptures and dead recoveries, it is frequently standard practice for the information from recoveries not to be used, so that tests are applied to the recapture data alone. We present new diagnostic tests for joint recapture–recovery data, which make full use of all of the data, and evaluate their power through simulation. The importance of including all available data is clearly shown. We see in addition that current procedures may fail to identify the correct model. The work is generalised to the case of multi-site joint recapture–recovery data and is illustrated on a data set of great cormorants. This article has supplementary material online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, R. J. (1995), “Open Population Mark-Recapture Models Including Ancillary Sightings,” Ph.D. thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

  • — (1997), “Joint Modeling of Live-Recapture, Tag-Resight, and Tag-Recovery Data,” Biometrics, 53, 666–677.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (1999), “Joint Analysis of Mark-Recapture, Resighting and Ring-Recovery Data with Age-Dependence and Marking Effect,” Bird Study, 46, 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2005), “Joint Modelling of Tag-Recovery and Life-Resighting Data,” in Handbook of Capture–Recapture Analysis, eds. S. C. Amstrup, T. L. McDonald, and B. F. J. Manly, pp. 142–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. (1993), “A Theory for Combined Analysis of Ring Recovery and Recapture Data,” in The Study of Bird Population Dynamics Using Marked Individuals, eds. J.-D. Lebreton and P. M. North, pp. 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., White, G. C., Brownie, C., and Pollock, K. H. (1987), “Design and Analysis Methods for Fish Survival Experiments Based on Release-Recapture,” in American Fisheries Society Monograph, Vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, E. A., and Morgan, B. J. T. (1997), “Detecting Parameter Redundancy,” Biometrika, 84, 187–196.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, E. A., Freeman, S. N., Morgan, B. J. T., and Harris, M. P. (1998), “Integrated Recovery/recapture Data Analysis,” Biometrics, 54, 33–46.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, R., Reboulet, A. M., Lebreton, J.-D., Gimenez, O., and Pradel, R. (2005), “U-CARE 2.2 User’s Manual,” CEFE, Montpellier, France.

  • Choquet, R., Lebreton, J. D., Gimenez, O., Reboulet, A. M., and Pradel, R. (2009), “U-CARE: Utilities for Performing Goodness of Fit Tests and Manipulating CApture–REcapture Data,” Ecography, 32, 1071–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. J., Morgan, B. J. T., and Titterington, D. M. (2010), “Determining the Parametric Structure of Non-Linear Models,” Mathematical Biosciences, 228, 16–30.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. J., Morgan, B. J. T., Catchpole, E. A., and Hubbard, B. A. (2012), “Parameter Redundancy in Ring-Recovery Models,” Biometrical Journal, 54, 507–523.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. (1964), “Estimates of Survival from the Sightings of Marked Animals,” Biometrika, 51, 429–438.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. C. (2003) Statistical Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, G., Pradel, R., Menu, S., and Lebreton, J. D. (2001), “Seasonal Survival of Greater Snow Geese and Effect of Hunting Under Dependence in Sighting Probabilities,” Ecology, 82, 3105–3119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay Larour, M.-L., Pradel, R., Guillemain, M., Santin-Janin, H., L’Hostis, M., and Caizergues, A. (2013), “Individual Turnover in Common Pochards Wintering in Western France,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 77, 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hénaux, V., Bregnballe, T., and Lebreton, J.-D. (2007), “Dispersal and Recruitment During Population Growth in a Colonial Bird, the Great Cormorant,” Journal of Avian Biology, 38, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, B. A., Cole, D. J., and Morgan, B. J. T. (2014), “Parameter Redundancy in Capture–Recapture–Recovery Models,” Statistical Methodology, 17, 17–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G. M. (1965), “Explicit Estimates from Capture–Recapture Data with Both Death and Immigration: Stochastic Model,” Biometrika, 52, 225–247.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Juillet, C., Choquet, R., Gauthier, G., and Pradel, R. (2011), “A Capture–Recapture Model with Double-Marking, Live and Dead Encounters, and Heterogeneity of Reporting Due to Auxiliary Mark Loss,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 16, 88–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, W. L., Conn, P. B., and Hines, J. E. (2006), “Combining Multistate Capture–Recapture Data with Tag Recoveries to Estimate Demographic Parameters,” Ecology, 87, 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R., and Brooks, S. P. (2002), “Model Selection for Integrated Recovery/Recapture Data,” Biometrics, 58, 841–851.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2003a), “Closed-Form Likelihoods for Arnason–Schwarz Models,” Biometrika, 90, 435–444.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2003b), “Survival and Spatial Fidelity of Mouflon: The Effect of Location, Age and Sex,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 8, 486–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., and Anderson, D. R. (1992), “Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies,” Ecological Monographs, 62, 67–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton, J.-D., Almeras, T., and Pradel, R. (1999), “Competing Events, Mixtures of Information and Multistratum Recapture Models,” Bird Study, 46, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, R. S., Morgan, B. J. T., Gimenez, O., Besbeas, P., Lebreton, J.-D., and Bregnballe, T. (2010), “Multi-site Integrated Population Modelling,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 15, 539–561.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, R. S., Morgan, B. J. T., and Bregnballe, T. (2012), “Model Comparison and Assessment for Multi-State Capture–Recapture–Recovery Models,” Journal of Ornithology, 152, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, R. S., Morgan, B. J. T., and Gimenez, O. (2014), “Certain Diagnostic Goodness-of-Fit Tests are Score Tests,” University of Kent Technical Report, UKC/SMSAS/14/001.

  • Péron, G., Crochet, P.-A., Choquet, R., Pradel, R., Lebreton, J.-D., and Gimenez, O. (2010), “Capture–Recapture Models with Heterogeneity to Study Survival Senescence in the Wild,” Oikos, 119, 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., and Hines, J. E. (1985), “Goodness of Fit Tests for Open Capture–Recapture Models,” Biometrics, 41, 399–410.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel, R. (1993), “Flexibility in Survival Analysis from Recapture Data: Handling Trap-Dependence,” in Marked Individuals in the Study of Bird Populations, eds. J.-D. Lebreton and P. M. North, pp. 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradel, R., Wintrebert, C. M. A., and Gimenez, O. (2003), “A Proposal for a Goodness-of-Fit Test to the Arnason–Schwarz Multisite Capture–Recapture Model,” Biometrics, 59, 43–53.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel, R., Gimenez, O., and Lebreton, J.-D. (2005), “Principles and Interest of GOF Tests for Multistate Capture–Recapture Models,” Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 28 (2), 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1965), “A Note on the Multiple Recapture Census,” Biometrika, 52, 249–259.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D., and Conroy, M. J. (2002), Analysis and Management of Animal Populations, San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. J. T. Morgan.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 31 kB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCrea, R.S., Morgan, B.J.T. & Pradel, R. Diagnostic Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Joint Recapture and Recovery Models. JABES 19, 338–356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-014-0174-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-014-0174-1

Key Words

Navigation