Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of circular strategies to better design circular industrial systems

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Remanufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Circular economy is an effective strategy to reduce globally the environmental impacts of our consumption society. However, the introduction of circular economy scenarios implies major changes in our consumption mode and in our industrial systems. Because of changes in the value chain, the new circular consumption and production scenarios imply new needs, new requirements and then characteristics for the production and organization of these circular offers. The aim of this paper is to present a characterization of the repurposing and upgrading strategies, in order to facilitate design activities related to new circular industrial scenarios. This paper presents the research approach used to characterise the upgrading and repurposing strategies and then the characteristics that have been established investigating academic and industrial projects using literature review and interviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Recycling, while very important at later stages, is not investigated in this paper as it ‘reduces products into raw material’ and does not retain the value added [27]. Attention is drawn to ‘end-of-use’ strategies only.

References

  1. European Commission (2015) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the Loop - An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Bruxelles, Belgique. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/

  2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013) Towards the circular economy. J Ind Ecol:23–44

  3. ERN(2017) The European remanufacturing network’. https://www.remanufacturing.eu/

  4. European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32008L0098

  5. Lund RT (1984) Remanufacturing. Technol Rev 87(2):19–29

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Go TF, Wahab DA, Hishamuddin H (2015) Multiple generation life-cycles for product sustainability: the way forward. J Clean Prod 95(June):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pialot O, Millet D, Bisiaux J (2017) “Upgradable PSS”: clarifying a new concept of sustainable consumption/production based on Upgradablility. J Clean Prod 141(January):538–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bauer T, Brissaud D, Zwolinski P (2017) Design for high added-value end-of-life strategies. In: Stark R, Seliger G, Bonvoisin J (eds) Sustainable manufacturing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 113–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Chakraborty K, Mondal S, Mukherjee K (2017) Analysis of product design characteristics for remanufacturing using fuzzy AHP and axiomatic design. J Eng Des 28(5):338–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paterson DAP, Ijomah WL, Windmill JFC (2017) End-of-life decision tool with emphasis on remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 148(Supplement C):653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beverungen D, Bräuer S, Plenter F, Klör B, Monhof M (2017) Ensembles of context and form for repurposing electric vehicle batteries: an exploratory study. Comput Sci Res Dev 32(1–2):195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tong S, Fung T, Klein MP, Weisbach DA, Park JW (2017) Demonstration of reusing electric vehicle battery for solar energy storage and demand side management. J Energy Storage 11(June):200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aziz NA, Wahab DA, Ramli R, Azhari CH (2016) Modelling and optimisation of upgradability in the design of multiple life cycle products: a critical review. J Clean Prod 112(Part 1 (January)):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amaya J, Zwolinski P, Brissaud D 2010. Environmental benefits of parts remanufacturing: the truck injector case. In: 17th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, N/A. Hefei, ANHUI, China. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00519559

  15. Matsumoto M, Nasr N (2016) Remanufacturing as an enabler for Green service models. In: Jones A, Ström P, Hermelin B, Rusten G (eds) Services and the Green economy. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp 75–98

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bauer T (2018) Concevoir un produit pour plusieurs vies : propositions pour la conception et l’évaluation environnementale de solutions en cascade. Phd thesis, Univ. Grenoble Alpes. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01988566/document

  17. Gray C, Charter M (2008) Remanufacturing and product design. Int J Prod Dev 6(3–4):375–392

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cor E, Domingo L, Brissaud D, Zwolinski P (2014) A protocol to perform usage oriented Ecodesign. CIRP Ann 63(1):169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmadi L, Yip A, Fowler M, Young SB, Fraser RA (2014) Environmental feasibility of re-use of electric vehicle batteries. Sustain Energy Tech Assess 6(June):64–74

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prassler E, Bruyninckx H, Nilsson K, Shakhimardanov A (2009) The use of reuse for designing and manufacturing robots.

  21. Abuzed SA, Tsang C-W, Foster MP, Stone DA (2016) Repurposing ATX power supply for battery charging applications. In: 5 .-5. Glasgow, UK

  22. Rogers D, Green J, Foster M, Stone D, Schofield D, Abuzed S, Buckley A (2013) Repurposing of ATX computer power supplies for PV applications in developing countries. In: 2013 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), 973–978

  23. Goodall P, Rosamond E, Harding J (2014) A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility. J Clean Prod 81 (October:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arnette AN, Brewer BL, Choal T (2014) Design for Sustainability (DFS): the intersection of supply chain and environment. J Clean Prod 83 (November:374–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zwolinski P, Lopez-Ontiveros M-A, Brissaud D (2006) Integrated Design of Remanufacturable Products Based on product profiles. J Clean Prod 14(15–16):1333–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hatcher GD, Ijomah WL, Windmill JFC (2011) Design for Remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. J Clean Prod 19(17–18):2004–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nasr N (2016) Remanufacturing and the circular economy. Edited by Ellen MacArthur Foundation Ellen MacArthur Foundation (Eds) A New Dynamic 2: 107–128

  28. Nasr, N., b Hilton, and R. German. 2011. ‘A framework for sustainable production and a strategic approach to a key enabler: remanufacturing’. In Advances in sustainable manufacturing, edited by Günther Seliger, Marwan M.K. Khraisheh, and I.S. Jawahir, 191–196. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

  29. Gelbmann U, Hammerl B (2015) Integrative re-use systems as innovative business models for devising sustainable product–service-systems. J Clean Prod , Special Volume: Why have ‘Sustainable Product-Service Systems’ not been widely implemented? 97(June):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bakker C, Wang F, Huisman J, den Hollander M (2014) Products that Go round: exploring product life extension through design. J Clean Prod 69(April):10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tolio T, Bernard A, Colledani M, Kara S, Seliger G, Duflou J, Battaia O, Takata S (2017) Design, management and control of Demanufacturing and remanufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66(2):585–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hartwell I, Marco J (2016) Management of Intellectual Property Uncertainty in a remanufacturing strategy for automotive energy storage systems. J Remanuf 6(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sakao T, Mizuyama H (2014) Understanding of a product/service system design: a holistic approach to support Design for Remanufacturing. J Remanuf 4(January):24

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roucoules L, Yannou B, Eynard B (2006) Ingénierie de la conception et cycle de vie des produits. Lavoisier: Hermes Science, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lecocq X, Demil B, Warnier V (2006) Le business model, un outil d’analyse stratégique. L’Expansion Manag Rev 123:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Q, Deniaud I, Lerch C, Baron C, Caillaud E (2016) Process modeling of innovative design using systems engineering. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 8th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control MIM 2016, 49 (12): 1579–1584

  37. Kamigaki K, Matsumoto M, Fatimah YA (2017) Remanufacturing and refurbishing in developed and developing countries in Asia – a case study in photocopiers. Procedia CIRP, The 24th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 61 (January): 645–650

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peggy Zwolinski.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauer, T., Zwolinski, P., Nasr, N. et al. Characterization of circular strategies to better design circular industrial systems. Jnl Remanufactur 10, 161–176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-020-00083-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-020-00083-x

Keywords

Navigation