Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deep Learning to Automatically Segment and Analyze Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm from Computed Tomography Angiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although segmentation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) thrombus is a crucial step for both the planning of endovascular treatment and the monitoring of the intervention’s outcome, it is still performed manually implying time consuming operations as well as operator dependency. The present paper proposes a fully automatic pipeline to segment the intraluminal thrombus in AAA from contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) images and to subsequently analyze AAA geometry.

Methods

A deep-learning-based pipeline is developed to localize and segment the thrombus from the CTA scans. The thrombus is first identified in the whole sub-sampled CTA, then multi-view U-Nets are combined together to segment the thrombus from the identified region of interest. Polygonal models are generated for the thrombus and the lumen. The lumen centerline is automatically extracted from the lumen mesh and used to compute the aneurysm and lumen diameters.

Results

The proposed multi-view integration approach returns an improvement in thrombus segmentation with respect to the single-view prediction. The thrombus segmentation model is trained over a training set of 63 CTA and a validation set of 8 CTA scans. By comparing the thrombus segmentation predicted by the model with the ground truth data, a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.89 ± 0.04 is achieved. The AAA geometry analysis provided an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.92 and a mean-absolute difference of 3.2 ± 2.4 mm, for the measurements of the total diameter of the aneurysm. Validation of both thrombus segmentation and aneurysm geometry analysis is performed over a test set of 14 CTA scans.

Conclusion

The developed deep learning models can effectively segment the thrombus from patients affected by AAA. Moreover, the diameters automatically extracted from the AAA show high correlation with those manually measured by experts.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

None.

Code Availability

None.

References

  1. Antiga, L., M. Piccinelli, L. Botti, B. Ene-Iordache, A. Remuzzi, and D. A. Steinman. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 46(11):1097–1112, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0420-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arash Salarian, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (icc). https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22099-intraclass-correlation-coefficient-icc

  3. Caradu, C., B. Spampinato, A. M. Vrancianu, X. Bérard, and E. Ducasse. Fully automatic volume segmentation of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm computed tomography images with deep learning approaches versus physician controlled manual segmentation. J. Vasc. Surg. 74(1):246-256.e6, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaikof, E. L., et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 67(1):2-77.e2, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chollet, Francois et al. Keras. 2015. https://keras.io

  6. Developers, TensorFlow. TensorFlow. Zenodo 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5043456.

  7. Fantazzini, A., et al. 3D automatic segmentation of aortic computed tomography angiography combining multi-view 2D Convolutional Neural Networks. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 11(5):576–586, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-020-00481-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Haller, S. J., et al. Intraluminal thrombus is associated with early rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 67(4):1051-1058.e1, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong, H. A. and U. U. Sheikh. Automatic detection, segmentation and classification of abdominal aortic aneurysm using deep learning. In 2016 IEEE 12th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA), Melaka, Malaysia, Mar. 2016, pp. 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA.2016.7515839.

  10. Kaladji, A., A. Lucas, G. Kervio, P. Haigron, and A. Cardon. Sizing for endovascular aneurysm repair: clinical evaluation of a new automated three-dimensional software. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 24(7):912–920, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2010.03.018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lareyre, F., C. Adam, M. Carrier, C. Dommerc, C. Mialhe, and J. Raffort. A fully automated pipeline for mining abdominal aortic aneurysm using image segmentation. Sci. Rep. 9(1):13750, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50251-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. López-Linares, K., et al. Fully automatic detection and segmentation of abdominal aortic thrombus in post-operative CTA images using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Med. Image Anal. 46:202–214, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. López-Linares, K., I. García, A. García-Familiar, I. Macía, and M. A. G. Ballester. 3D convolutional neural network for abdominal aortic aneurysm segmentation. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorensen, W. E., and H. E. Cline. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 21(4):163–169, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1145/37402.37422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maiora, J., B. Ayerdi, and M. Graña. Random forest active learning for AAA thrombus segmentation in computed tomography angiography images. Neurocomputing. 126:71–77, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.01.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maurer, C. R., R. Qi, and V. Raghavan. A linear time algorithm for computing exact Euclidean distance transforms of binary images in arbitrary dimensions. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 25(2):265–270, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1177156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCormick, M., X. Liu, J. Jomier, C. Marion, and L. Ibanez. ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science. Front. Neuroinform. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Óleary, S. A., E. G. Kavanagh, P. A. Grace, T. M. McGloughlin, and B. J. Doyle. The biaxial mechanical behaviour of abdominal aortic aneurysm intraluminal thrombus: classification of morphology and the determination of layer and region specific properties. J. Biomech. 47(6):1430–1437, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ronneberger, O., P. Fischer, and T. Brox, ‘U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation’, ArXiv150504597 Cs, May 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.

  20. Schroeder, W., K. Martin, and B. Lorensen. The visualization toolkit: an object-oriented approach to 3D graphics; visualize data in 3D—medical, engineering or scientific; build your own applications with C++, Tcl, Java or Python; includes source code for VTK (supports Unix, Windows and Mac), 4th ed. Clifton Park, NY: Kitware Inc, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shen, D., G. Wu, and H.-I. Suk. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 19(1):221–248, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, K., et al. Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromsø study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 25(5):399–407, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1856.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf, I., et al. The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Med. Image Anal. 9(6):594–604, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2005.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Y., Q. Liao, and J. Zhang. Exploring efficient volumetric medical image segmentation using 2.5D method: an empirical study. ArXiv201006163 Cs Eess, 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06163

Download references

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Conti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Associate Editor Igor Efimov oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brutti, F., Fantazzini, A., Finotello, A. et al. Deep Learning to Automatically Segment and Analyze Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm from Computed Tomography Angiography. Cardiovasc Eng Tech 13, 535–547 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-021-00594-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-021-00594-z

Keywords

Navigation