Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Variability in Payoffs on Conditions for the Evolution of Cooperation in a Small Population

  • Published:
Dynamic Games and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the effect of stochastic fluctuations in payoffs for two strategies, cooperation and defection, used in random pairwise interactions in a population of fixed finite size with an update according to a Moran model. We assume that the means, variances and covariances of the payoffs are of the same small order while all higher-order moments are negligible. We show that more variability in the payoffs to defection and less variability in the payoffs to cooperation contribute to the evolutionary success of cooperation over defection as measured by fixation probabilities under weak selection. This conclusion is drawn by comparing the probabilities of ultimate fixation of cooperation and defection as single mutants to each other and to what they would be under neutrality. These comparisons are examined in detail with respect to the population size and the second moments of the payoffs in five cases of additive Prisoner’s Dilemmas. The analysis is extended to a Prisoner’s Dilemma repeated a random number of times with Tit-for-Tat starting with cooperation and Always-Defect as strategies. Moreover, simulations with an update according to a Wright–Fisher model suggest that the conclusions are robust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antal T, Nowak MA, Traulsen A (2009) Strategy abundance in \(2\times 2\) games for arbitrary mutation rates. J Theor Biol 257:340–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Broom M (2005) Evolutionary games with variable payoffs. C R Biol 328:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ewens WJ (2004) Mathematical population genetics: I theoretical introduction. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Fudenberg D, Imhof LA (2006) Imitation processes with small mutations. J Econ Theory 131:251–262

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fudenberg D, Nowak MA, Taylor C, Imhof LA (2006) Evolutionary game dynamics in finite populations with strong selection and weak mutation. Theor Popul Biol 70:352–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1998) The theory of evolution and dynamical systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan H, Hill K, Hurtado AM (1990) Risk, foraging and food sharing among the Ache. In: Cashdan E (ed) Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant economies. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 107–144

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karlin S, Levikson B (1974) Temporal fluctuations in selection intensities: case of small population size. Theor Popul Biol 6:383–412

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Karlin S, Taylor P (1975) A first course in stochastic processes, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kroumi D, Lessard S (2021) The effect of variability in payoffs on average abundance in two-player linear games under symmetric mutation. J Theor Biol 513:110569

  11. Lande R, Engen S, Saether B-E (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Lambert A (2006) Probability of fixation under weak selection: a branching process unifying approach. Theor Popul Biol 69:419–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lessard S (2005) Long-term stability from fixation probabilities in finite populations: new perspectives for ESS theory. Theor Popul Biol 68:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lessard S (2011) Evolution of cooperation in finite populations. In: Sigmund K (ed) Evolutionary game dynamics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 143–171

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Li C, Lessard L (2020) Randomized matrix games in a finite population: effect of stochastic fluctuations in payoffs on the evolution of cooperation. Theor Popul Biol 143:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li C, Ji T, He QQ, Zheng ZD, Zhang BY, Lessard S, Tao Y (2019) Uncertainty in payoffs for defection could be conductive to the evolution of cooperative behavior (preprint)

  17. May RM (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nowak MA (2006) Evolutionary dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Nowak MA, Sasaki A, Taylor C, Fudenberg D (2004) Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations. Nature 428:646–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Otto SP, Whitlock MC (1997) The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. Genetics 146:723–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parsons TL, Quince C (2007) Fixation in haploid populations exhibiting density dependence I: the non-neutral case. Theor Popul Biol 72:121–135

  22. Parsons TL, Quince C (2007) Fixation in haploid populations exhibiting density dependence II: the quasi-neutral case. Theor Popul Biol 72:468–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rousset F, Billiard D (2000) A theoretical basis for measures of kin selection in subdivided populations: finite populations and localized dispersal. J Evol Biol 13:814–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rousset F (2003) A minimal derivation of convergence stability measures. J Theor Biol 221:665–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stollmeier F, Nagler J (2018) Unfair and anomalous evolutionary dynamics from fluctuating payoffs. Phys. Rev Lett 120:058101

  26. Tarnita C, Ohtsuki H, Antal T, Fu F, Nowak MA (2009) Strategy selection in structured populations. J Theor Biol 259:570–581

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor PD, Jonker L (1978) Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math Biosci 40:145–156

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Uecker H, Hermisson J (2011) On the fixation process of a beneficial mutation in a variable environment. Genetics 188:915–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu B, Altrock PM, Wang L, Traulsen A (2010) Universality of weak selection. Phys Rev E 82:046106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu B, Traulsen A, Gokhale CS (2013) Dynamic Properties of evolutionary multi-player games in finite populations. Games 4:182–199

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Zeeman RC (1980) Populations dynamics from game theory. In: Nitecki ZH, Robinson RC (eds) Global theory of dynamical systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng XD, Li C, Lessard S, Tao Y (2017) Evolutionary stability concepts in a stochastic environment. Phys Rev E 96:032414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zheng XD, Li C, Lessard S, Tao Y (2018) Environmental noise could promote stochastic local stability of behavioral diversity evolution. Phys Rev Lett 120:218101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D. Kroumi was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) through Project No. SR181014. É. Martin and S. Lessard were supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Undergraduate Student Research Award and Discovery Grant No. 8833, respectively). We thank three anonymous referees for helpful comments to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabin Lessard.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Research is supported in part by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Appendices

Appendix A: A First-Order Approximation

Note that \(|\eta _i|<M\), for \(i=1,2,3,4\), which yields \(|\bar{P}(x)|\le M<1\) for any x in [0, 1]. Using Taylor’s theorem, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{1+\bar{P}(x)}=1-\bar{P}(x)+\bar{P}^2(x)+\frac{\bar{P}^3(x)}{(1+\xi )^3}, \end{aligned}$$
(84)

where \(\xi \) is a random variable that depends on \(\bar{P}(x)\) such that \(\xi \in (0,\bar{P}(x))\) if \(\bar{P}(x)>0\) or \(\xi \in (\bar{P}(x),0)\) if \(\bar{P}(x)<0\). This leads to

$$\begin{aligned} E\left[ \frac{1+P_C(x)}{1+\bar{P}(x)}\right]&=E\left[ \left( 1+P_C(x)\right) \left( 1-\bar{P}(x) +\bar{P}^2(x)+\frac{\bar{P}^3(x)}{(1+\xi )^3}\right) \right] \nonumber \\&=E\Big [\left( 1+P_C(x)\right) \left( 1-\bar{P}(x)+\bar{P}^2(x)\right) \Big ] +E\left[ \frac{(1+P_C(x))\bar{P}^3(x)}{(1+\xi )^3}\right] . \end{aligned}$$
(85)

If \(\bar{P}(x)>0\), we have \(1\le 1+\xi \le 1+\bar{P}(x)\), which leads to

$$\begin{aligned} \left| \frac{1}{1+\xi }\right| \le 1. \end{aligned}$$
(86)

If \(\bar{P}(x)<0\), we have \(0<1+\bar{P}(x)\le 1+\xi \le 1\), which leads to

$$\begin{aligned} \left| \frac{1}{1+\xi }\right| \le \left| \frac{1}{1+\bar{P}(x)}\right| \le \frac{1}{1-|\bar{P}(x)|}\le \frac{1}{1-M}, \end{aligned}$$
(87)

since \(|\bar{P}(x)|\le M<1\). Combining these inequalities, we get

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{(1+\xi )^3}\le \sup \left\{ 1,\frac{1}{(1-M)^3}\right\} =K, \end{aligned}$$
(88)

where K is a finite constant. Then, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&\left| E\left[ \frac{(1+P_C(x))\bar{P}^3(x)}{(1+\xi )^3}\right] \right| \le E\left[ \frac{|1+P_C(x)||\bar{P}^3(x)|}{(1+\xi )^3}\right] \\&\quad \quad \quad \le K E\left[ |1+P_C(x)||\bar{P}^3(x)|\right] . \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(89)

On the other hand, by using condition (3), we have

$$\begin{aligned} E\left[ |1+P_C(x)||\bar{P}^3(x)|\right] =o(\delta ). \end{aligned}$$
(90)

We conclude that

$$\begin{aligned} E\left[ \frac{(1+P_C(x))\bar{P}^3(x)}{(1+\xi )^3}\right] =o(\delta ). \end{aligned}$$
(91)

Appendix B: Calculation of Summations

Using the elementary arithmetic identities

$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^4&=\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)(3n^2+3n-1)}{30}, \end{aligned}$$
(92a)
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^3&=\frac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4}, \end{aligned}$$
(92b)
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{i=1}^{n}i^2&=\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6},\end{aligned}$$
(92c)
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{i=1}^{n}i&=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}, \end{aligned}$$
(92d)

we get

$$\begin{aligned}&\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}(N-i)m\Big (\frac{i}{N}\Big )\nonumber \\&\quad =A_3\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}(N-i)\frac{i^3}{N^3}+A_2\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}(N-i) \frac{i^2}{N^2}+A_1\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}(N-i)\frac{i}{N}\nonumber \\&\quad \quad +A_0\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}(N-i)\nonumber \\&\quad =A_3\frac{(N^2-1)(3N^2-2)}{60N^2}+A_2\frac{N^2-1}{12}+A_1\frac{N^2-1}{6}+A_0\frac{N(N-1)}{2}\nonumber \\&\quad =\frac{N^2-1}{2}\Bigg [\frac{3N^2-2}{30N^2}A_3+\frac{A_2+2A_1}{6}+\frac{N}{N+1}A_0\Bigg ] \end{aligned}$$
(93)

and

$$\begin{aligned}&\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}m\Big (\frac{i}{N}\Big )\nonumber \\&\quad =A_3\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}\frac{i^3}{N^3}+A_2\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}\frac{i^2}{N^2}+A_1\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}\frac{i}{N}+A_0\sum _{i=1}^{N-1}1\nonumber \\&\quad =A_3\frac{N^2(N-1)^2}{4N^3}+A_2\frac{N(N-1)(2N-1)}{6N^2}+A_1\frac{N(N-1)}{2N}+A_0(N-1)\nonumber \\&\quad =(N-1)\Bigg [\frac{N-1}{4N}A_3+\frac{2N-1}{6N}A_2+\frac{A_1}{2}+A_0\Bigg ]. \end{aligned}$$
(94)

Appendix C: Simulation Data

This appendix contains the simulation data in Cases 1 and 2 under a Moran model (Figs. 910) and a Wright–Fisher model (Figs. 1112). For a population size going from 2 to 20 and parameter values \(\delta =0.02\), \(\mu _b=2\) and \(\mu _c=1\), the fixation probabilities \(F_C\) and \(F_D\) are calculated from \(10^6\) repeated runs for each value of the scaled variance \(\sigma ^2\) in a uniform probability distribution.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Simulation data under a Moran model in Case 1

Fig. 10
figure 10

Simulation data under a Moran model in Case 2

Fig. 11
figure 11

Simulation data under a Wright–Fisher model in Case 1

Fig. 12
figure 12

Simulation data under a Wright–Fisher model in Case 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kroumi, D., Martin, É., Li, C. et al. Effect of Variability in Payoffs on Conditions for the Evolution of Cooperation in a Small Population. Dyn Games Appl 11, 803–834 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-021-00383-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-021-00383-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation