Skip to main content
Log in

Equichordal Tight Fusion Frames

  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Grassmannian fusion frame is an optimal configuration of subspaces of a given vector space, that are useful in some applications related to representing data in signal processing. Grassmannian fusion frames are robust against noise and erasures when the signal is reconstructed. In this paper, we present an approach to construct optimal Grassmannian fusion frames based on a given Grassmannian frame. We also analyse an algorithm for sparse fusion frames which was introduced by Calderbank et al. and present necessary and sufficient conditions for the output of that algorithm to be an optimal Grassmannian fusion frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Bachoc and M. Ehler, Tight p-fusion frames, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 35(1) (2013), 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Balan, P. G. Casazza, and D. Edidin, On signal reconstruction without noisy phase, Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., 20(3) (2006), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. V. Balan, I. Daubechies, and V. Vaishampayan, The analysis and design of windowed Fourier frame based multiple description source coding schemes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 46(7) (2000), 2491–2536.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. B. G. Bodmann and V. I. Paulsen, Frame paths and error bounds for sigma-delta quantization, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 22(2) (2007), 176–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Boufounos, G. Kutyniok, and H. Rauhut, Sparse recovery from combined fusion frame measuements, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory., 57(6) (2011), 3864–3876.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Calderbank, P. G. Casazza, A. Heinecke, G. Kutyniok, and A. Pezeshki, Sparse fusion frame: Existence and construction, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 22(2) (2007), 176–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. E. J. Candes and D. L. Donoho, New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities, Comm. Pure and Appl. Math., 57(2) (2004), 219–266.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. P. G. Casazza, A. Heinecke, and G. Kutyniok, Optimally sparse fusion frames: Existence and construction, Sampta’11 Singapore, Proc., (2011).

  9. P. G. Casazza and G. Kutyniok, Frames of subspaces, In: Wavelets, frames and operator theory, College Park, MD, 2003, In: Contemp. Math., 345, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2004), 87–113.

  10. P. G. Casazza and G. Kutyniok, Fusion frames and distributed processing, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 25(1) (2008), 114–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. Conway, R. H. Hardin, and N. J. A. Sloane, Packing lines, planes, etc.: Packings in Grassmannian spaces, Experiment. Math., 5(2) (1996), 139–159.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Daubechies, B. Han, A. Ron and Z. Shen, Framelets: MRA-based constructions of wavelet frames, Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., 14(1) (2003), 1–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. C. Eldar, Sampling and reconstruction in arbitrary spaces and oblique dual frame vectors, J. Fourier Analys. Appl., 1(9) (2003), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. K. Goyal and J. Kovacevic, Quantized frame expansions with erasures, J. Fourier Analys. Appl., 1(9) (2003), 77–96.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Grochenig, Fundation of Time-frequency analysis, Applied and numerical harmonic analysis, Birkhauser, Boston, MA (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emily J. King, Grassmannian fusion frames, arXiv:1004.1086, (2010).

  17. G. Kutyniok, A. Pezeshki, R. Calderbank, and T. Liu, Robust dimension reduction, fusion frames, and Grassmannian packings, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 26(1) (2009), 64–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Osgooei and A. A. Arefi-Jamaal, Compare and contrast duals of fusion and discrete frames, Sahand Commun. Math. Anal., 8(1) (2016), 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Rahimi, Z. Darvishi, and B. Daraby, On the duality of c-fusion frames in Hilbert spaces, Anal. Math. Phys., 7(4) (2016), 335–348.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Strohmer and R. W. Heath Jr., Grassmannian frames with applications to coding and communication, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 14(3) (2003), 257–275.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mozhgan Mohammadpour, Rajab Ali Kamyabi-Gol or Ghosheh Abed Hodtani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadpour, M., Kamyabi-Gol, R.A. & Hodtani, G.A. Equichordal Tight Fusion Frames. Indian J Pure Appl Math 51, 889–900 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-020-0439-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-020-0439-z

Key words

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation