Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Return to the Operation Theatre: An Analysis of Repeat Surgeries in Operative Obstetrics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the risk factors and associated comorbidities with a relaparotomy after primary surgery in pregnant mothers and to identify preventable causes.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was done at a tertiary care centre from January 2009 till August 2014. All records of exploratory laparotomy following primary surgery in the obstetric population during this period were retrieved from the hospital database and analysed.

Results

The incidence of relaparotomy was 0.22 %. In 94 % cases, the primary surgery was caesarean section. The commonest indication for relaparotomy was due to haemorrhagic complications like bleeding and haematoma (66.8 %). Sepsis was seen in 36.1 % cases with the predominant organism isolated being E coli (54 %). Most common comorbidity was hypertensive disorders (58 %) followed by liver disorders (19 %). 33.3 % needed ventilatory support, 30.5 % needed massive blood transfusion, 16.6 % were on total parenteral nutrition and 2.7 % needed renal replacement therapy. Maternal mortality was 2.8 %.

Conclusion

Relaparotomy following caesarean section is considered a near-miss mortality. Care must be taken in primary surgery with meticulous attention to haemostasis. Strict postoperative vigilance must be adhered to for timely detection of complications and appropriate intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, et al. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(4):791–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raagab AE, Mesbah YH, Brakat RI, et al. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section. Med Arch. 2014;68(1):44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seal SL, Kamilya G, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Relaparotomy after caesarean delivery: experience from an Indian Teaching Hospital. J obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33:804–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sak ME, Turgut A, Evsen MS, et al. RElaparotomy after initial surgery in obstetric and gynecology operations: analysis of 113 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2012;83:429–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levin I, Rapaport AS, Satzer L, et al. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(2):163–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seffah JD. Re-laparotomy after Cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;88(3):253–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kessous R, Danor D, Weintraub YA, et al. Risk factors for relaparotomy after cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Unalp H, Kamer E, Onal M. Analysis of early relaparotomy after lower gastrointestinal system surgery. Surg Today. 2008;38:323–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Opøien HK, Valbø A, Grinde-Andersen A, et al. Post-cesarean surgical site infections according to CDC standards: rates and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(9):1097–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gedikbasi A, Akyol A, Asar E, et al. Re-laparotomy after cesarean section: operative complications in surgical delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(5):419–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maimoona Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Human Rights and Ethical Statements

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

All registrants at the study hospital provide informed consent as a routine for the use of their data for academic and research purposes.

Additional information

Dr. Maimoona Ahmed, MS, is a Fellow in High Risk Pregnancy and Perinatology at Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, India; Dr. Sunil T. Pandya, MD, is Head of Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care at Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad; Dr. Tarakeswari Supraneni, MD, Head of Department, High Risk Pregnancy at Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, M., Pandya, S.T. & Supraneni, T. Return to the Operation Theatre: An Analysis of Repeat Surgeries in Operative Obstetrics. J Obstet Gynecol India 66 (Suppl 1), 117–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0815-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0815-5

Keywords

Navigation