Abstract
The purpose of this study
This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of positron emission tomography–CT (PET–CT) in diagnosis and management of gynecological malignancies in primary and recurrent settings and also to investigate its role in inappropriately treated patients, for pretreatment evaluation (staging) to help in proper therapeutic management.
Method
This is a retrospective study of 56 patients of gynecological malignancy registered in Gujarat Cancer Research Institute from June 2011 to December 2013.
Results
Out of 56 cases where PET was done, the results were as follows: carcinoma cervix—23, carcinoma ovary—20, carcinoma endometrium—9, carcinoma vulva—1, carcinoma vagina—2, and GTN—1. PET scan was negative in 37 % of patients where CT scan was suspicious, which changed the therapeutic modality and prevented further unnecessary interventions. In cases where clinical suspicion of recurrence was high based on rising tumor marker and CT scan was negative, subsequent PET–CT was able to pick up malignancy in 75 % cases. Eleven patients (25 %) with suspected recurrence with inconclusive CT scan and negative PET–CT scan were kept on follow-up, thus reducing further morbidity and cost.
Conclusion
Addition of PET-CT, a noninvasive method to the oncologist’s imaging armamentarium may ultimately improve both outcomes and costs by altering management strategies in primary and recurrent settings. The potential use of PET–CT appears promising in several decision-making steps in the management of patients with gynecological malignancy. It defines the extent of metastatic disease which enables the clinician to decide regarding salvageable surgical intervention or palliative measures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, et al. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:183–91.
Sironi S, Picchio M, Mangili G, et al. (18F) Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a useful indicator of metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumor: preliminary results in three patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:226–30.
Wolfman DJ, Ascher SM, et al. Diagnostic imaging techniques in gynecologic oncology. 5th ed. 2009. p. 197–230.
Unger JB, Lilien DL, Caldito G, et al. The prognostic value of pretreatment 2-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography scan in women with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1062–7.
Nakamura K, Hongo A, Kodama J, et al. The measurement of SUVmax of the primary tumor is predictive of prognosis for patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;123:82–7.
Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. FDG-PET Evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix. Clin Positron Imaging. 1999;2:105–9.
Kerr IG, Manji MF, Powe J, et al. Positron emission tomography for the evaluation of metastases in patients with carcinoma of the cervix: a retrospective review. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81:477–80.
Wong TZ, Jones EL, Coleman RE. Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose for evaluating local and distant disease in patients with cervical cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004;6:55–62.
Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, et al. Post-therapy surveillance monitoring of cervical cancer by FDG PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(4):907–13.
Schwarz JK. Association of post-therapy positron emission tomography with tumour response and survival in cervical carcinoma. JAMA. 2007;298:2289–95.
Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(17):3745–9.
Yen TC, Lai CH, Ma SY, et al. Comparative benefits and limitations of (18)F FDG PET and CT-MRI in documented or suspected recurrent cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1399–407.
Pannu HK, Bristow RE, Cohade C, et al. PET-CT in recurrent ovarian cancer: initial observations. RadioGraphics. 2004;24(1):209–23.
Zimny M, Siggelkow W, Schröder W, et al. 2-[Fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83(2):310–5.
Nanni C, Rubello D, Farsad M, et al. 18F-FDG PETCT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective study on forty-one patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:792–7.
Chung HH, Kang WJ, Kim JW, et al. The clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer: correlation with clinical and histological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1081–8.
Cohn DE, Dehdashti F, Gibb RK, et al. Prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography for the detection of groin node metastases from vulva cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85:179–84.
Compliance with ethical requirements and Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no ethical conflicts. Dr. Ashwini Pawar, Dr. Digvijay Patil, Dr. Shilpa Patel, Dr. Meeta Mankad, and Dr. Pariseema declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pawar, A.A., Patil, D.B., Patel, S. et al. Role of PET–CT Scan in Gynaeconcology. J Obstet Gynecol India 66, 339–344 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0681-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0681-1