Abstract
A total of 9 SNPs located in TFRC and ACK1 genes of SSC13q41 genomic region were examined for their association with the adhesion pattern of native Indian pigs using local isolate of diarrhoeagenic E. coli. Phenotypic evaluation of adhesion pattern of 150 pigs revealed 116 animals positive for adhesion, whereas 34 animals had non-adhesive phenotype. Among the adhesive animals, 6, 87 and 23 pigs were strongly adhesive, weakly adhesive and adhesive, respectively. PCR–RFLP study revealed 8 polymorphic SNPs with low to moderate PIC ranging from 7.39 to 37.25% and low to high heterozygosities (8–70%). The loci g.291 C > T, rs81218930 C > T, rs318751568 C > T of TFRC and g.93222 C > A g.94600 C > T of ACK1 showed significant departure from HWE. The genotypic frequencies of the SNPs as well as the haplotypes did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) across the adhesion patterns except one SNP (ACK1-g.107371 A > C). Among the g.107371 A > C genotypes observed, CA was associated with non-adhesive phenotype. Furthermore, TFRC mRNA expression levels were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) different among various adhesive phenotypes, whereas that of ACK1 was significantly (P < 0.05) different between non-adhesive and adhesive groups. The significant association of SNP (ACK1-g.107371 A > C), which was also previously reported to influence ETECF4 mediated diarrhoea susceptibility, implicates its wider application in genetic control of piglet diarrhoea. Furthermore, the up-regulation of TFRC gene expression in adhesive group supports its proposed role in activation of immune cells against E. coli and intracellular iron transport.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ACK1:
-
Activated CDC42 kinase 1
- AD:
-
Allelic diversity
- AICRP:
-
All India coordinated research project
- AT:
-
Annealing temperature
- BHI:
-
Brain–heart infusion
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- dbSNP:
-
Single-nucleotide polymorphism database
- DT:
-
Digestion temperature
- EDTA:
-
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- ETECF4:
-
F4 fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli
- Ht:
-
Heterozygosity
- HWE:
-
Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (χ2-probability)
- LB:
-
Lysogeny broth
- LD:
-
Linkage disequilibrium
- MAT:
-
Microscopic adhesion test
- MUC13:
-
Mucin 13
- MUC20:
-
Mucin 20
- MUC4:
-
Mucin 4
- N:
-
Number of observations
- OD:
-
Optical density
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PIC:
-
Polymorphism information content
- RE:
-
Restriction enzyme
- RFLP:
-
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
- RT:
-
Reverse transcription
- SNP:
-
Single-nucleotide polymorphism
- SSC:
-
Sus scrofa (pig)
- TFRC:
-
Transferrin receptor
References
Baker DR, Billey LO, Francis DH (1997) Distribution of K88 Escherichia coli-adhesive and nonadhesive phenotypes among pigs of four breeds. Vet Microbiol 54:123–132
Bijlsma IG, de Nijs A, van der Meer C, Frik JF (1982) Different pig phenotypes affect adherence of Escherichia coli to jejunal brush borders by K88ab, K88ac, or K88ad antigen. Infect Immun 37:891–894
Billey LO, Erickson AK, Francis DH (1998) Multiple receptors on porcine intestinal epithelial cells for the three variants of Escherichia coli K88 fimbrial adhesin. Vet Microbiol 59:203–212
Chaora N (2013) Breed susceptibility to enterotoxigenic and enteroaggragative Escherichia coli strains in South African pigs. Thesis, Master of Science in Agriculture (Animal Science), University of KwaZulu-Natal
Dai C, Sun L, Xia R, Sun S, Zhu G, Wu S, Bao W (2017) Correlation between the methylation of the FUT1 promoter region and FUT1 expression in the duodenum of piglets from newborn to weaning. 3 Biotech 7:247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0880-9
Dekker J, Rossen JW, Büller HA, Einerhand AW (2002) The MUC family: an obituary. Trends Biochem Sci 27:126–131
Edfors-Lilja I, Gustafsson U, Duval-Iflah Y, Ellergren H, Jo-hansson M, Juneja RK, Marklund L, Andersson L (1995) The porcine intestinal receptor for Escherichia coli K88ab, K88ac: regional localization on chromosome 13 and influence of IgG response to the K88 antigen. Anim Genet 26:237–242
Eliades NG, Eliades DG (2009). HAPLOTYPE ANALYSIS: software for analysis of haplotypes data. Distributed by the authors. Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Georg-Augst University Goettingen, Germany
Guerin G, Duval-Iflah Y, Bonneau M, Bertaud M, Guillaume P, Ollivier L (1993) Evidence for linkage between K88ab, K88ac intestinal receptors to Escherichia coli and transferrin loci in pigs. Anim Genet 24:393–396
Harel E, Rubinstein A, Nissan A, Khazanov E, Milbauer MN, Barenholz Y, Tirosh B (2011) Enhanced transferrin receptor expression by proinflammatory cytokines in enterocytes as a means for local delivery of drugs to inflamed gut mucosa. PLoS ONE 6:e24202
Jacobsen M, Kracht SS, Esteso G, Cirera S, Edfors I, Archibald A, Bendixen C, Andersson L, Fredholm M, Jorgensen CB (2009) Refined candidate region specified by haplotype sharing for Escherichia coli F4ab/F4ac susceptibility alleles in pigs. Anim Genet 41:21–25
Jacobsen M, Cirera S, Joller D, Esteso G, Kracht SS, Edfors I, Bendixen C, Archibald AL, Vogeli P, Neuenschwander S, Bertschinger HU, Rampoldi A, Andersson L, Fredholm M, Jorgensen CB (2011) Characterisation of five candidate genes within the ETEC F4ab/ac candidate region in pigs. BMC Res Notes 4:225
Jorgensen CB, Cirera S, Archibald AL, Anderson L, Fredholm M, Edfors-Lilja I (2004) Porcine polymorphisms and methods for detecting them. In: International application published under the patent cooperation treaty (PCT), PCT/DK2003/000807; WO:2004/048606-A2
Li YH, Qiu XT, Li HJ, Zhang Q (2007) Adhesive patterns of Escherichia coli F4 in piglets of three breeds. J Genet Genomics 34:591–599
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408
Meijerink E, Neuenschwander S, Fries R, Dinter A, Bertschinger HU, Stranzinger G, Vogeli P (2000) A DNA polymorphism influencing alpha(l,2) fucosyltransferase activity of the pig FUT1 enzyme determines susceptibility of small intestinal epithelium to Escherichia coli F18 adhesion. Immunogenetics 52:129–136
Moon HW, Hoffman LJ, Cornick NA (1999) Prevalences of some virulence genes among Escherichia coli isolates from swine presented to a diagnostic laboratory in Iowa. J Vet Diagn Invest 11:557–560
Nygard AB, Jorgenson CB, Cierra S, Fredholm M (2007) Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in pig tissues using SYBR green qPCR. BMC Molecular Biology 8:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-67
Python P, Jorg H, Neuenschwander S, Hagger C, Stricker C, Burgi E, Bertschinger HU, Stranzinger G, Vogeli P (2002) Fine-mapping of the intestinal receptor locus for enterotoxi-genic Escherichia coli F4ac on porcine chromosome 13. Anim Genet 33:441–447
Python P, Jorg H, Neuenschwander S, Asai-Coakwell M, Hagger C, Burgi E, Bertschinger HU, Stranzinger G, Vogeli P (2005) Inheritance of the F4ab, F4ac and F4ad E. coli receptors in swine and examination of four candidate genes for F4acR. J Anim Breed Genet 122(S1):5–14
Reich DE (2001) Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature 411:199–204
Ren J, Tang H, Yan XM, Huang X, Zhang B, Ji HY, Huang LS (2009) A pig-human comparative RH map comprising 20 genes on pig chromosome 13q41 that harbors the ETEC F4ac receptor locus. J Anim Breed Genet 126:30–36
Rita DM, Wbipp SC, Max FR (1994) Resistance of Chinese Meishan, Fengjing, and Minzhu pigs to the K88ac + strain of Escherichia coli. Am J Vet Res 55:333–338
Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York, pp 527–535
Schroyen M, Stinckens A, Verhelst R, Cox E, Niewold T, Buys N (2012) Susceptibility of piglets to enterotoxigenic E. coli is not related to the expression of MUC13 and MUC20. Anim Genet 43:324–327
Schroyen M, Stinckens A, Verhelst R, Janssens S, Cox E, Goddeeris BM, Georges M, Niewold T, Buys N (2013) The effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ab/ac on early-weaned piglets: a gene expression study. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 152:87–92
Sellwood R (1980) Genetic susceptibility to intestinal infection-animal models. In: Rotter JI, Samloff IM, Rimoin DL (eds) The genetics and heterogeneity of common gastrointestinal disorders. Academic Press, London, pp 537–549
Sellwood R, Gibbons RA, Jones GW, Rutter JM (1975) Adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to pig intestinal brush borders: the existence of two pig phenotypes. J Med Microbiol 8:405–411
Shome R, Shome BR, Rahman M, Kumar A, Murugkar HV, Rahman H, Bujarbaruah K (2005) Plasmid diversity in Escherichia coli strains isolated from piglet diarrhoea. Indian J Anim Sci 75:196–198
Sinha R, Sahoo NR, Kumar P, Qureshi S, Kumar A, Ravikumar GVPPS, Bhushan B (2018a) Comparative jejunal expression of MUC 13 in indian pigs differentially adhesive to diarrhogenic E. coli. J Appl Anim Res 46:107–111
Sinha R, Sahoo NR, Shrivastava K, Kumar P, Qureshi S, Kumar A, Ravikumar GVPPS, Bhushan B (2018b) Effect of Mucin 13 gene polymorphism on diarrhoeagenic E. coli adhesion pattern and its expression analysis in native Indian pigs. Archiv Anim Breed 61:321–328
Sinha R, Sahoo NR, Shrivastava K, Kumar P, Qureshi S, Kumar A, Ravikumar GVPPS, Bhushan B (2019) Resistance to ETEC F4/F18 mediated piglet diarrhoea: opening the gene black box. Trop Anim Health Prod 51:1307–1320
Takezaki N, Nei M (1996) Genetic distance and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144:389–399
Trevisi P, Corrent E, Messori S, Formica S, Priori D, Bosi P (2012) Supplementary tryptophan downregulates the expression of genes induced by the gut microbiota in healthy weaned pigs susceptible to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4. Livest Sci 147:96–103
Van den Broeck W, Cox E, Oudega B, Goddeeris BM (2000) The F4 fimbrial antigen of Escherichia coli and its receptors. Vet Microbiol 71:223–244
Van Poucke M, Yerle M, Tuggle C, Piumi F, Genet C, Van Zeveren A, Peelman LJ (2001) Integration of porcine chromosome 13 maps. Cytogenet Cell Genet 93:297–303
Vu Khac H, Holoba E, Pilipcinec E, Blanco M, Blanco JE, Mora A (2006) Serotypes, virulence genes and PFGE profiles of Escherichia E. coli isolated from pigs with post-weaning diarrhoea in Slovakia. BMC Vet Res 2:10
Wang YZ, Ren J, Lan LT, Yan XM, Huang X, Peng QL, Tang H, Zhang B, Ji HY, Huang LS (2007) Characterization of polymorphisms of transferrin receptor and their association with susceptibility to ETEC F4ab/ac in pigs. J Anim Breed Genet 124:225–229
Yan X, Huang X, Ren J, Zou Z, Yang S, Ouyang J, Zeng W, Yang B, Xiao S, Huang L (2009) Distribution of Escherichia coli F4 adhesion phenotypes in pigs of 15 Chinese and Western breeds and a White Duroc 9 Erhualian intercross. J Med Microbiol 58:1112–1117
Yang W, Lin Q, Guan JL, Cerione RA (1999) Activation of the Cdc42-associated tyrosine kinase-2 (ACK-2) by cell adhesion via integrin β1. J Biol Chem 274:8524–8530
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Director, IVRI, Izzatnagar, Bareilly, for providing necessary facilities to carry out this research work. Furthermore, they are thankful to owners of different slaughter houses in and around Bareilly for facilitating collection of samples.
Funding
The authors are thankful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) for providing necessary financial assistance in the form of an institute project (Grant No. IXX10577) to corresponding author as well as institute fellowship to first author during the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical statement
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rawat, C., Sahoo, N.R., Wagh, S.S. et al. Association of ACK1, TFRC polymorphism with diarrhoeagenic E. coli adhesion patterns and their jejunal expression profile in Indian Ghurrah pigs. 3 Biotech 9, 422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1956-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1956-5