Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective optimization and network security enhancement for congestion management in wholesale electricity market

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an effective approach for managing congestion in a power transmission system by optimally placing distributed generators at the load end. Congestion management involves multiple objectives such as elimination of congestion, minimum congestion cost and bus voltage limit violations. DG has been proved as viable source for removing the congestion problem of the transmission system. Optimal placement of DG has been done for decreasing locational marginal price, nodal congestion price thereby maximizing social welfare function and network security in deregulated power system. The multi-objective optimal power flow problem considered here is mainly for achieving balance between social welfare function and network security. Social welfare function relates with value of market which is the summation of producer and consumer surplus whereas network security relates mainly for security of transmission system. The proposed system lowers the overall price paid to market operators by assigning balanced weights to social welfare and network security enhancing the overall system performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya N, Mithulananthan N (2007) Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. Electr Power Syst Res 77(3–4):352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afkousi-Paqaleh M, Fard AAT, Rashidinejad M (2010) Distributed generation placement for congestion management considering economic and financial issues. Electr Eng 92(6):193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghayipour M, Akbari Foroud A, Soofiabadi A (2014) A comprehensive fair nodal pricing scheme, considering participants’ efficiencies and their rational shares of total cost of transmission losses. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 63:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya B, Gupta VK (2014) Fuzzy based evolutionary algorithm for reactive power optimization with FACTS devices. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 61:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudekar P, Asija D (2017) Prediction of voltage collapse in power system using voltage stability indices. In: Proceeding of international conference on intelligent communication, control and devices, pp 51–58

  • Christie RD, Wollenberg BF, Wangensteen I (2000) Transmission management in the deregulated environment. Proc IEEE 88(2):170–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conejo AJ, Milano F, García-Bertrand R (2006) Congestion management ensuring voltage stability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(1):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF, Lehe LJ (2015) Distance-dependent congestion pricing for downtown zones. Transp Res B Methodol 75:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulau LI, Abrudean M, Bica D (2016) Optimal location of a distributed generator for power losses improvement. Proc Technol 22:734–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Singh SP (2015) Optimal rescheduling of generators for congestion management based on particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(4):1560–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granelli G, Montagna M, Zanellini F, Bresesti P, Vailati R, Innorta M (2006) Optimal network reconfiguration for congestion management by deterministic and genetic algorithms. Electr Power Syst Res 76(6–7):549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibiki T, Sakakibara E, Iwamoto S (2007) Line flow sensitivities of line reactances for congestion management. IEEE Power Eng Soc Gen Meet 24(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang CQ, Chen QX, Lin WM, Hong YR, Xia Q, Chen ZX, Xin JB (2013) Zonal marginal pricing approach based on sequential network partition and congestion contribution identification. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 51:321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Mittapalli RK (2014) Congestion management with generic load model in hybrid electricity markets with FACTS devices. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 57:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Srivastava SC, Singh SN (2004) A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(1):554–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon JD, Hedman KW, Zhang M (2014) Reserve requirements to efficiently manage intra-zonal congestion. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(1):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milano F (2005) A graphical and open source Matlab-GAMS interface for electricity market models. In: Spanish Portuguese Congress on Electrical Engineering

  • Mithulananthan N, Oo T, Van Phu L (2004) Distributed generator placement in power distribution system using genetic algorithm to reduce losses. Thammasat Int J Sci Technol 9(3):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay A, Karthikeyan SP, Kothari DP (2015) Congestion management in power systems—a review. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 70:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh G, Kumar TKS (2016) Optimal allocation of TCSC and DG unit for congestion management in deregulated power systems. Int J Electr Eng Inform 8(2):303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan M, Slochanal SMR, Venkatesh P, Abraham JPS (2007) Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability. Electr Power Syst Res 77(3–4):276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen KK, Sen ML (2003) Comparison of the ‘Sen’ transformer with the unified power flow controller. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 18(4):1523–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shandilya A, Gupta H, Sharma J (1993) Method for generation rescheduling and load shedding to alleviate line overloads using local optimisation. IEEE Proc C Gener Transm Distrib 140(5):337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirmohammadi D, Wollenberg B, Vojdani A, Sandrin P, Pereira M, Rahimi F, Schneider T, Stott B (1998) Transmission dispatch and congestion management in the emerging energy market structures. Power Syst IEEE Trans 13(4):1466–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha SK, Prasad R, Patel RN (2010) Automatic generation control of restructured power systems with combined intelligent techniques. Int J Bio Inspir Comput 2(2):124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song SH, Lim JU, Moon SI (2004) Installation and operation of FACTS devices for enhancing steady-state security. Electr Power Syst Res 70(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana S, Roy PK (2016) Krill herd algorithm for optimal location of distributed generator in radial distribution system. Appl Soft Comput J 40:391–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma S, Saha S, Mukherjee V (2017) A novel symbiotic organisms search algorithm for congestion management in deregulated environment. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 29(1):59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volodin DV, Vaskovskaya TA (2015) Clustering approach for determination of congestion zones on nodal electricity markets in long term periods. In: IEEE Eindhoven Power-Tec, Power-Tech 2015

  • Yesuratnam G, Thukaram D (2007) Congestion management in open access based on relative electrical distances using voltage stability criteria. Electr Power Syst Res 77(12):1608–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divya Asija.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asija, D., Soni, K.M., Sinha, S.K. et al. Multi-objective optimization and network security enhancement for congestion management in wholesale electricity market. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8 (Suppl 2), 1775–1782 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0668-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0668-7

Keywords

Navigation