Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Intraoperative Pectoral Nerve Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy: a Double-Blind Prospective Randomised Interventional Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Severe acute postoperative pain following breast surgery increases the risk of persistent pain and affects the recovery of patients. Recently, pectoral nerve (PECs) block has gained significance as a regional fascial block that can provide adequate postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PECs II block, which was given intraoperative under direct vision after performing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer patients. This prospective randomised study was comprised of a PECs II group (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). Group A patients received 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for PECs II block intraoperatively after the surgical resection was done. Both groups were compared with respect to the demographic and clinical parameters, total intraoperative fentanyl dose, total duration of surgery, postoperative pain score (Numerical Rating Scale) and the analgesic requirement, postoperative complications, postoperative duration of hospital stay, and the outcome. Intraoperative PECs II block was not associated with any increase in the duration of surgery. The postoperative pain scores were significantly higher in the control group till 24 h after the surgery, and so was the postoperative analgesic requirement. Patients in the PECs group were found to have rapid recovery and decreased postoperative complications. Intraoperative PECs II block is not only safe, time-saving procedure but also significantly reduces the postoperative pain and analgesic requirement in breast cancer surgeries. It is also associated with a faster recovery, decreased postoperative complications, and better patient satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng W, Fu D, He L (2020) Evaluation of pectoral nerve block in modified radical mastectomy: comparison of three concentrations of Ropivacaine. Clin Interv Aging 22(15):937–944. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S251613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzales J, Lovald ST, Lau EC, Ong KL (2018) Risk of opioid-related adverse events after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 27(2):148–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Senapathi TGA, Widnyana IMG, Aribawa IGNM, Jaya AAGPS, Junaedi IMD (2019) Combined ultrasound-guided Pecs II block and general anesthesia are effective for reducing pain from modified radical mastectomy. J Pain Res 12:1353–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S197669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Freise H, Van Aken HK (2011) Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 107(6):859–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanco R, Fajardo M, Maldonado TP (2012) Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modifiedPecsI): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 59(9):470–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Westbrook AJ, Buggy DJ (2003) Anaesthesia for breast surgery. Br J Anaesth 8(5):151–154

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzales J (2016) PECS versus PVBS for perioperative analgesic management in breast surgery. ASRA News 16(3):41–44

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jin Z, Li R, Gan TJ, He Y, Lin J (2020) Pectoral Nerve (PECs) block for postoperative analgesia-a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 12(1):40–50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G (2016) Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 117:382–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bashandy GMN, Abbas DN (2015) Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 40(1):68–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eldeen HMS (2016) Ultrasound guided pectoral nerve blockade versus thoracic spinal blockade for conservative breast surgery in cancer breast: a randomized controlled trial. Egypt J Anaesthesia 32(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Desroches J, Belliveau M, Bilodeau C, Landry M, Roy M, Beaulieu P (2018) Pectoral nerves I block is associated with a significant motor blockade with no dermatomal sensory changes: a prospective volunteer randomized-controlled double-blind study. Can J Anaesth 65(7):806–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1122-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamiya Y, Hasegawa M, Yoshida T, Takamatsu M, Koyama Y (2018) Impact of pectoral nerve block on postoperative pain and quality of recovery in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 35(3):215–223. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen MP, McFarland CA (1993) Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 55:195–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Syal K, Chandel A (2017) Comparison of the post-operative analgesic effect of paravertebral block, pectoral nerve block and local infiltration in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: a randomised double-blind trial. Indian J Anaest 61:643–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Scanaill P, Keane S, Wall V, Flood G, Buggy DJ (2018) Single-shot pectoral plane (PECs I and PECs II) blocks versus continuous local anaesthetic infusion analgesia or both after non-ambulatory breast-cancer surgery: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Br J Anaesth 120(4):846–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim D, Kim S, Kim CS et al (2018) Efficacy of pectoral nerve block type II for breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Pain Res Manag 2018:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blanco R, Barrington MJ (2017) Pectoralis and serratus plane blocks. In: Hadzic A (ed) Hadzic’s Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, pp 650–660

    Google Scholar 

  20. De Cassai A, Bonanno C, Sandei L, Finozzi F, Carron M, Marchet A (2019) PECS II block is associated with lower incidence of chronic pain after breast surgery. Korean J Pain 32(4):286–291. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bashandy GM, Abbas DN (2015) Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia in breast cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 40(1):68–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakshi SG, Karan N, Parmar V (2017) Pectoralis block for breast surgery: a surgical concern.? Indian J Anaesth 61:851–2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdelaziz Ahmed AA (2018) Efficacy of pectoral nerve block using Bupivacaine with or without magnesium sulfate. Anesth Essays Res 12(2):440–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_37_18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RJ: concept, design, literature search, writing; SM: analysis and/or interpretation; SB: supervision; critical review; design; PP: analysis and/or interpretation; literature search; SS: critical review; supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohit Jindal.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The research involved human Participants and a well informed consent was taken from each individual. Also, approval was taken from the institutional ethical committee.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jindal, R., Meena, S., Bhati, S. et al. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Intraoperative Pectoral Nerve Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy: a Double-Blind Prospective Randomised Interventional Study. Indian J Surg Oncol 14, 215–221 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01680-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01680-x

Keywords

Navigation