Abstract
Obturator is derived from the Latin verb obturate which means to close or to shut off. This definition provides an appropriate description of the objective of obturation in patients with palatal defects. The obturator is often helpful in improving the speech of individuals with partial or total velar defects i.e. cleft of soft palate. Soft palate cleft is one of the most common cause of velopharyngeal incompetence, which is the functional inability of the soft palate to effectively seal with the posterior and or lateral pharyngeal walls. In maxillofacial prosthesis the clinician may have the responsibility for reestablishing palatopharyngeal integrity to provide the potential for acceptable speech. Here a case report has been presented in which palatal plate with a solid one piece pharyngeal obturator prosthesis has been used for rehabilitation of a dentulous patient having congenital soft palate defect using functional impression technique.
References
Thomas CA, Beumer J III (1979) Maxillofacial rehabilitation prosthodontic and surgical considerations, Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, St. Louis, pp 244–291
Stewart KL, Rudd KD, Kubekar WA (2004) Clinical removable partial prosthodontics, 2nd edn. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc, Publishers, Tokyo, St. Louis, pp 635–665
Aramany MA (1978) Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I. Classification. J Prosthet Dent 40:54
Paul G, Harlan B (1958) A supportive type prosthetic speech aid. J Prosthet Dent 8:362–369
Warren D (1965) A physiologic approach to cleft palate prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 15:770–778
Wood MT, Warren DW (1971) Effect of cleft palate prostheses on respiratory effort. J Prosthet Dent 26:213–218
Marshell RC, Jones RN (1971) Effects of palatal lift prostheses upon speech intelligibility of dysarthric patients’. J Prosthet Dent 25:327–333
Beumer J, Brady F (1978) Dental management of the irradiated patient. Int J Oral Surg 7:208
Zarb GA, Blonder CL (2004) Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patient: complete dentures and implant-supported prostheses. In: Jacob RF (ed) Maxillofacial prosthodontics for the edentulous patient. Mosby Inc, St. Louis, pp 449–470
Skolnick L, McCall GN, Barnes M (1973) The sphincter mechanism of velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J 10:286–305
Wolfaardt JF, Wilson FB, Rochet A, McPhee L (1993) An appliance based approach to the management of palatopharyngeal incompetency: a clinical pilot project. J Prosthet Dent 69:186–195
Chambers MS, Lemon JC, Martin JW (2004) Obturation of partial soft palate defect. J Prosthet Dent 91:75–79
Sheldon W (2009) Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics, 2nd edn. AITBS publishers, India, pp 81–87
Gonzalez JB, Laney WR (1996) Resilient materials for denture prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 16:438–444
Anusavice (2004) Philip’s science of dental materials, 11th edn. Saunders, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 721–757
Sprintzen RJ, Bardach J (eds) (1995) Cleft palate speech management. CV Mosby, St Louis
Shelton RL, Lindquist AF (1968) Effect of speech bulb reduction on articulation, cleft palate. J Prosthet Dent 5:195
Aran A, Subhtenly JD (1959) Velopharyngeal function and cleft palate prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 9:149
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varghese, K. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Congenital Soft Palate Defect. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (Suppl 1), 181–186 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0225-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0225-7