Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Viable Treatment Alternative in Distal Extension Cases: A Case Report

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

Dentures requiring support from teeth, the mucosa and the underlying alveolar ridges are subjected to many forces that adversely effect the abutment teeth and the residual ridges during functional and parafunctional activity. A number of designs of the framework and the direct retainers were used to improve the comfort and acceptance of the patient wearing a removable partial denture. Attachment retained removable partial denture is one of the viable treatment alternative through which significant number of patients could be benefited. In this particular case of distal extension, attachment retained removable partial denture was chosen as a treatment modality. This article provides an overview and a simplified approach to this treatment through a case report and the criteria followed for selection of the particular attachments for treating the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Eggbeer D, Bibb R, William R (2005) The computer aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable denture frameworks. J Eng Med 219(3):195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feinberg E, Feinberg EM (1984) Attachment retained partial dentures. NYS Dent J 50(3):161–164

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feinberg E (1982) Diagnosing and prescribing therapeutic attachment: retained partial dentures. NYS Dent J 48(1):27–29

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lorencki FS (1969) Planning precision attachment restorations. J Prosthet Dent 21(5):506–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns DR, Ward JE (1990) A review of attachments for removable partial denture. Part I classification and selection. Int J Prosthodont 3:98–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burns DR, Ward JE (1990) A review of attachments for removable partial denture. Part II. Treatment planning and attachment selection. Int J Prosthodont 3:169–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Preiskel HW (1995) Precision attachment in prosthodontics 1 and 2. Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker JL, Goodkind RJ (1981) Precision attachment removable partial dentures. Mosby, San Mateo

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kapur KK, Deupree R, Dent RJ, Hasse AL (1994) A Randomised clinical trial of two basic removable partial denture designs. Part I. Comparision of five year success rate and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 72(3):268–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Staubli PE (1994) Attachments and implants: reference manual, 6th edn. Attachments International, San Malere

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bambara GE (2004) The attachment retained overdenture. NYS Dent J 70(9):30–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swetha Kukunoor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kukunoor, S., Savadi, R.C., Venkata Krishnam Raju, K. et al. A Viable Treatment Alternative in Distal Extension Cases: A Case Report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (Suppl 1), 177–180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0218-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0218-6

Keywords

Navigation