Abstract
Introduction
Previous work has shown poisoning-related emergency department (ED) visits are increasing, and these visits are resource-intensive. Little is known, however, about how resource utilization for patients with known or suspected poisoning differs from that of general ED patients.
Methods
We reviewed 4 years of operational data at a single ED. We identified visits due to known or suspected poisoning (index cases), and paired them with time-matched controls. In the primary analysis, we compared the groups with respect to a broad array of resource utilization characteristics. In a secondary analysis, we performed the same comparison after excluding patients ultimately transferred to a psychiatric facility.
Results
There were 405 index cases and 802 controls in the primary analysis, and 374 index cases and 741 controls in the secondary analysis. In the primary/secondary analyses, patients with known or suspected poisoning had longer ED lengths of stay in minutes (370 vs. 232/295 vs. 234), higher rates of laboratory results per patient (40.4 vs. 26.8/39.6 vs. 26.8), greater administration of intravenous medications and fluids per patient (2.0 vs. 1.6/2.1 vs. 1.6), higher rates of transfer to a psychiatric facility (7.7 vs. 0.2%/not applicable), and higher rates of both admission (40.2 vs. 32.8/43.6 vs. 33.1%) and admission to an advanced care bed (21.5 vs. 7.6/23.3 vs. 7.8%). Patients with known or suspected poisoning had lower rates of imaging per patient, for both plain radiographs (0.4 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5) and advanced imaging studies (0.3 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5).
Conclusions
ED patients with known or suspected poisoning are more resource intensive than general ED patients. These results may have implications for both resource allocation (particularly for departments that might see a high volume of such patients) and ED operations management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American College of Emergency Physicians. Cost of emergency care fact sheet. Accessed 17 Nov 2016 at http://newsroom.acep.org/fact_sheets?item=29928.
Lee MH, Schuur JD, Zink BJ. Owning the cost of emergency medicine: beyond 2%. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(5):498–505.
Mazer-Amirshahi M, Sun C, Mullins P, Perrone J, Nelson L, Pines JM. Trends in emergency department resource utilization for poisoning-related visits, 2003–2011. J Med Toxicol. 2016;12(3):248–54.
Woolf A, Wieler J, Greenes D. Costs of poison-related hospitalizations at an urban teaching hospital for children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(7):719–23.
Krajewski AK, Friedman LS. Hospital outcomes and economic costs from poisoning cases in Illinois. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015;53(5):433–45. doi:10.3109/15563650.2015.1030677.Epub.
Inocencio TJ, Carroll NV, Read EJ, Holdford DA. The economic burden of opioid-related poisoning in the United States. Pain Med. 2013;14(10):1534–47.
Henneman PL, Nathanson BH, Ribeiro K, Balasubramanian H. The impact of age and gender on resource utilization and profitability in ED patients seen and released. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(10):1159–67. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2014.06.030.
Psoter KJ, Roudsari BS, Mack C, Vavilala MS, Jarvik JG. Outcomes and resource utilization associated with underage drinking at a level I trauma center. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55(2):195–200. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.018.
Storrow AB, Jenkins CA, Self WH, Alexander PT, Barrett TW, Han JH, et al. The burden of acute heart failure on U.S. emergency departments. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2(3):269–77. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2014.01.006.
Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Jones P, Litovitz T, Coben J, Steiner C, et al. The potential impact of poison control centers on rural hospitalization rates for poisoning. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):2094–100.
Galvão TF, Silva MT, Silva CD, Barotto AM, Gavioli IL, Bucaretchi F, et al. Impact of a poison control center on the length of hospital stay of poisoned patients: retrospective cohort. Sao Paulo Med J. 2011;129(1):23–9.
Friedman LS, Krajewski A, Vannoy E, Allegretti A, Wahl M. The association between U.S. poison center assistance and length of stay and hospital charges. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014;52(3):198–206. doi:10.3109/15563650.2014.892125.
Bunn TL, Slavova S, Spiller HA, Colvin J, Bathke A, Nicholson VJ. The effect of poison control center consultation on accidental poisoning inpatient hospitalizations with preexisting medical conditions. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(4):283–8. doi:10.1080/15287390701738459.
Chafee-Bahamon C, Lovejoy FH Jr. Effectiveness of a regional poison center in reducing excess emergency room visits for children’s poisonings. Pediatrics. 1983;72(2):164–9.
LoVecchio F, Curry S, Waszolek K, Klemens J, Hovseth K, Glogan D. Poison control centers decrease emergency healthcare utilization costs. J Med Toxicol. 2008;4(4):221–4.
Lee V, Kerr JF, Braitberg G, Louis WJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Frauman AG, et al. Impact of a toxicology service on a metropolitan teaching hospital. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2001;13(1):37–42.
Lucas R, Farley H, Twanmoh J, Urumov A, Olsen N, Evans B, et al. Emergency department patient flow: the influence of hospital census variables on emergency department length of stay. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(7):597–602. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00397.x.
Saghafian S, Hopp WJ, Van Oyen MP, Desmond JS, Kronick SL. Complexity-augmented triage: a tool for improving patient safety and operational efficiency. Manuf Serv Oper Manag. 2014;16(3):329–45.
Saghafian S, Hopp WJ, Van Oyen MP, Desmond JS, Kronick SL. Paitent streaming as a mechanism for improving responsiveness in emergency departments. Oper Res. 2012;60(5):1080–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Sources of Funding
There are no funding sources for this project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Traub, S.J., Saghafian, S., Buras, M.R. et al. Resource Utilization in Emergency Department Patients with Known or Suspected Poisoning. J. Med. Toxicol. 13, 238–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-017-0619-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-017-0619-3