Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating Personalized Technology in Toxicology: Sensors, Smart Glass, and Social Media Applications in Toxicology Research

  • Preliminary Research
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid proliferation of mobile technologies in social and healthcare spaces create an opportunity for advancement in research and clinical practice. The application of mobile, personalized technology in healthcare, referred to as mHealth, has not yet become routine in toxicology. However, key features of our practice environment, such as frequent need for remote evaluation, unreliable historical data from patients, and sensitive subject matter, make mHealth tools appealing solutions in comparison to traditional methods that collect retrospective or indirect data. This manuscript describes the features, uses, and costs associated with several of common sectors of mHealth research including wearable biosensors, ingestible biosensors, head-mounted devices, and social media applications. The benefits and novel challenges associated with the study and use of these applications are then discussed. Finally, opportunities for further research and integration are explored with a particular focus on toxicology-based applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chai PR. Wearable devices and biosensing: future frontiers. J Med Toxicol. 2016;12:332–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. World Health Organization. 2011. http://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2016

  3. Peng W, Kanthawala S, Yuan S, Hussain SA. A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chow CK, Ariyarathna N, Islam SMS, Thiagalingam A, Redfern J. mHealth in Cardiovascular Health Care. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25:802–7.

  5. Ben-Zeev D, Schueller SM, Begale M, Duffecy J, Kane JM, Mohr DC. Strategies for mHealth research: lessons from 3 mobile intervention studies. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42:157–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chai PR, Wu RY, Ranney ML, Porter PS, Babu KM, Boyer EW. The virtual toxicology service: wearable head-mounted devices for medical toxicology. J Med Toxicol. 2014;10:382–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chai PR, Carreiro S, Innes BJ, Rosen RK, O'Cleirigh C, Mayer KH, et al. Digital pills to measure opioid ingestion patterns in emergency department patients with acute fracture pain: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2017. doi:10.2196/jmir.7050

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Skolnik AB, Chai PR, Dameff C, Gerkin R, Monas J, Padilla-Jones A, et al. Teletoxicology: patient assessment using wearable audiovisual streaming technology. J Med Toxicol. 2016;12:358–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carreiro S, Fang H, Zhang J, Wittbold K, Weng S, Mullins R, et al. iMStrong: deployment of a biosensor system to detect cocaine use. J Med Syst. 2015;39:186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Alharbi M, Bauman A, Neubeck L, Gallagher R. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:1476–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanai M, Nozoe M, Izawa KP, Takeuchi Y, Kubo H, Mase K, et al. Promoting physical activity in hospitalized patients with mild ischemic stroke: a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016; 24:256–261.

  12. Browne SH, Behzadi Y, Littlewort G. Let visuals tell the story: medication adherence in patients with type II diabetes captured by a novel ingestion sensor platform. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e108–119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kane JM, Perlis RH, DiCarlo LA, Au-Yeung K, Duong J, Petrides G. First experience with a wireless system incorporating physiologic assessments and direct confirmation of digital tablet ingestions in ambulatory patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74:e533–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chai PR, Wu RY, Ranney ML, Bird J, Chai S, Zink B, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of Google Glass for emergency department dermatology consultations. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:794–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chai PR, Babu KM, Boyer EW. The feasibility and acceptability of Google Glass for teletoxicology consults. J Med Toxicol. 2015;11:283–7.

  16. Boyer EW, Lapen PT, Macalino G, Hibberd PL. Dissemination of psychoactive substance information by innovative drug users. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007;10:1–6.

  17. Shutler L, Nelson LS, Portelli I, Blachford C, Perrone J. Drug Use in the Twittersphere: a qualitative contextual analysis of tweets about prescription drugs. J Addict Dis. 2015;34:303–10.

  18. Braithwaite SR, Giraud-Carrier C, West J, Barnes MD, Hanson CL. Validating machine learning algorithms for twitter data against established measures of suicidality. JMIR Ment Health. 2016;3:e21.

  19. Chai PR, Rosen RK, Lewis DM. Crowd-Sourced Focus Groups on Twitter: 140 Characters of Research Insight. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2017; 3746–53.

  20. Pagoto SL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, Oleski JL, Olendzki E, Hayes RB, et al. Twitter-Delivered Behavioral Weight-Loss Interventions: A Pilot Series. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4:e123

  21. Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA Am Med Assoc. 2015;313:459–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carreiro S, Wittbold K, Indic P, Fang H, Zhang J, Boyer EW. Wearable biosensors to detect physiologic change during opioid use. J Med Toxicol. 2016;12:255–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thielen M, Sigrist L, Magno M, Hierold C, Benini L. Human body heat for powering wearable devices: from thermal energy to application. Energy Convers Manag. 2017;131:44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chai P, Rosen RK, Boyer EW. Ingestible bosensors for real-time medication adherence monitoring: MyTMed. Proc Annu Hawai Int Conf Syst Sci. 2016; 3416–3423.

  25. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chai PR, Castillo-Mancilla J, Buffkin E, Darling C, Rosen RK, Horvath KJ, Boudaux, ED, Robbins, GK, Hibbard, PL, Boyer EW. Utilizing an ingestible biosensor to assess real-time medication Adherence. J. Med. Toxicol. 2015;11:439–444.

  27. Yuce MR, Dissanayake T. Easy-to-swallow wireless telemetry. IEEE Microwave magazine. 2012. doi:10.1109/MMM.2012.2205833

  28. Belknap R, Weis S, Brookens A, Au-Yeung KY, Moon G, DiCarlo L, et al. Feasibility of an ingestible sensor-based system for monitoring adherence to tuberculosis therapy. PLoS ONE. 2013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053373

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chai PR, Carreiro S, Rosen RK, Boyer EW. Patient Acceptance of Ingestible Biosensor Systems. Washington DC: Society of Behavioral Medicine Annual Meeting and Scientific Sessions; 2016.

  30. Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Jones P, Litovitz T, Coben J, Steiner C, et al. The potential impact of poison control centers on rural hospitalization rates for poisoning. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2094–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Skolnik A. Telemedicine and toxicology: back to the future? J Med Toxicol. 2013;9:217–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Skolnik AB, Chai PR, Dameff C, Gerkin R, Monas J, Padilla-Jones A, et al. Teletoxicology: patient assessment using wearable audiovisual streaming technology. J Med Toxicol. 2016;12(4):358–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perrin A. Social Media Usage: 2005-2015. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/social-networking-usage-2005-2015/. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.

  34. Smith A.  Older Adults and Technology Use. Pew Reseach Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/04/PIP_Seniors-and-Tech-Use_040314.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.

  35. Lenhart A. Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015. Pew research Center.  http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/. Accessed 28 Nov 2016

  36. Katsuki T, Mackey TK, Cuomo R. Establishing a link between prescription drug abuse and illicit online pharmacies: analysis of twitter data. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e280.

  37. Deluca P, Davey Z, Corazza O, Di Furia L. Identifying emerging trends in recreational drug use; outcomes from the Psychonaut Web Mapping Project. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012;39:221–6.

  38. Kalyanam J, Katsuki T, Lanckriet G, Mackey TK. Exploring trends of nonmedical use of prescription drugs and polydrug abuse in the Twittersphere using unsupervised machine learning. Addict Behav. 2017;65:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hanson CL, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier C, West JH, Barnes MD, Hansen B. Tweaking and tweeting: exploring Twitter for nonmedical use of a psychostimulant drug (Adderall) among college students. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e62.

  40. Freifeld CC, Brownstein JS, Menone CM, Bao W, Filice R, Kass-Hout T, et al. Digital drug safety surveillance: monitoring pharmaceutical products in twitter. Drug Saf. 2014;37:343–50. 

  41. Mining Social Media for Adverse Event Surveillance. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RegulatoryScience/ucm455305.htm. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.

  42. Sarker A, Ginn R, Nikfarjam A, O'Connor K, Smith K, Jayaraman S, et al. Utilizing social media data for pharmacovigilance: a review. J Biomed Inform. 2015;54:202–12.

  43. Yang M, Kiang M, Shang W. Filtering big data from social media—Building an early warning system for adverse drug reactions. J Biomed Inform. 2015;54:230–40.

  44. Metcalf D, Milliard S, Gomez M, Schwartz M. Wearables and the internet of things for health: wearable, interconnected devices promise more efficient and comprehensive health care. IEEE Pulse. 2016. doi:10.1109/MPUL.2016.2592260.

  45. Boudreaux ED, Waring ME, Hayes RB, Sadasivam RS, Mullen S, Pagoto S. Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4:363–71.

  46. Cai H, Venkatasubramanian KK. Fusion of Electrocardiogram and Arterial Blood Pressure Signals for Authentication in Wearable Medical Systems. IEEE Conference on Computer and Network Systems CNS Workshop. 2016:1–5.

  47. Kotz D, Gunter CA, Kumar S, Weiner JP. Privacy and security in mobile health: a research agenda. Computer (Long Beach California). 2016;49:22–30.

  48. Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, et al. Mobile health technology evaluation. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:228–36. 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Carreiro.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Sources of Funding

Dr. Boyer is supported by the National Institutes of Health 1K24DA037109. Dr. Carreiro is supported by the National Institutes of Health KL2 TR001455-01.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carreiro, S., Chai, P.R., Carey, J. et al. Integrating Personalized Technology in Toxicology: Sensors, Smart Glass, and Social Media Applications in Toxicology Research. J. Med. Toxicol. 13, 166–172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-017-0611-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-017-0611-y

Keywords

Navigation