Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Legal Gender Affirmation, Psychological Distress, and Physical Health Issues: Indirect Effects via Enacted Stigma

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

One way that transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people may affirm their gender is through a legal name and/or gender marker change. Legal gender affirmation is associated with less psychological distress, but research has yet to expand upon the mechanisms that may help explain this association. We examined associations between legal gender affirmation, psychological distress, and physical health in TGD people, as well as the mediating effect of exposure to enacted stigma.

Methods

Data are from the baseline portion of a longitudinal mixed-methods study of how sociopolitical contexts influence marginalization, health, and resilience for TGD people. The study included 158 TGD participants from Oregon, Michigan, Nebraska, and Tennessee. Baseline data were collected September 2019–March 2020 (the overall study concluded Fall 2021).

Results

Latent variable structural equation model analyses revealed that participants who had legally affirmed their gender reported less enacted stigma, which was associated with less psychological distress and physical health issues. There was a significant indirect effect via enacted stigma, such that this variable may partially help explain why legal gender affirmation is associated with better health outcomes.

Conclusions

Legal gender affirmation is likely to influence TGD people’s health and well-being by shaping exposure to minority stress—specifically, enacted stigma. Our findings demonstrate the importance of sociopolitical factors in health outcomes for TGD people.

Policy Implications

Given the health benefits of legal gender affirmation and the potential protection from enacted stigma, policies should be revised to make legal name and/or gender marker changes more accessible for TGD people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the members of the community board associated with Trans Collaborations in Nebraska for their thoughtful feedback. We also deeply appreciate the time of all the participants who contributed to this study. This study also would not have been possible without the many dedicated research team members across all sites. We wish to thank T. Zachary Huit, Brenna R. Lash, Tian Walker, Natalie Holt, Allura Ralston, Makinna Miles, A. Capannola, Clove Tipton, Geeta Eick, Bex Macfife, Holly Moulton, Lindsey Foltz, Kelsi Kuehn, Oliver Hoover, Jaden Haun, Beyla Geoffrey, Alex Jagielski, Julia Rohrabaugh, Lauren King Watt, Felix Hart, Rin Nguyen, Maryam Razzaq, Belle Andrus, Kalei Glozier, Rowan Giffel, Felix Brown, Taylor Anderson, Callie Harris, Megan Wertz, Heather Barnes, Sage Volk, Lex Pulice-Farrow, and Drs. Kirsten Gonzalez, Jennifer Jabson-Tree, and Cindi StrutzStreetharan for their involvement in this work.

Funding

No grant funding is affiliated with this study. 

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jae A. Puckett and L. Zachary DuBois conceptualized and led the overarching study. Jae A. Puckett led data analysis for this manuscript. Sarah Price, Terra Dunn, Kelsi Kuehn, Devon Kimball, and L. Zachary DuBois contributed to original writing and all co-authors were involved in editing the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript. 

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae A. Puckett.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Oregon.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puckett, J.A., Price, S., Dunn, T. et al. Legal Gender Affirmation, Psychological Distress, and Physical Health Issues: Indirect Effects via Enacted Stigma. Sex Res Soc Policy (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-00971-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-00971-y

Keywords

Navigation