Abstract
Introduction
The paternalism characterizing pity has long been critiqued by people with disabilities, including for fueling the sexual rights restrictions of women labeled with intellectual disability (ID). We used Fiske’s Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske et al., 2002) framework to examine majority group women’s perceptions of ID-labeled women and the relation of pity to their support for ID-labeled women’s sexual rights and related policies.
Methods
In 2020, we surveyed 307 majoritized (i.e., White, heterosexual, and cisgender) adult women in the U.S. through an online recruitment platform. We elicited their perspectives regarding four marginalized groups of women, including those who are labeled with ID, low-income, adolescents, and lesbians.
Results
Women labeled with ID were viewed as more warm than competent and were regarded with pity more than other groups of marginalized women. Evaluations of competence were associated with support for sexual rights and related policies of ID-labeled women, but not women in the other marginalized groups.
Conclusions
These results underscore disability scholars’ and activists’ concerns that pity is particularly directed toward ID-labeled women and that it may undermine others’ support of their sexual rights and opportunities.
Policy Implications
In response, we advocate for a broader conception of competence and greater social integration. To uphold inalienable sexual rights for all ID-labeled women, we argue for policies that entitle women to enhanced resources as they direct their own sexual lives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Anderson, R. M. (2013). Positive sexuality and its impact on overall well-being. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 56, 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1607-z
Arstein-Kerslake, A. (2019). Gendered denials: Vulnerability created by barriers to legal capacity for women and disabled women. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 66, 101501–101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101501
Arstein-Kerslake, A. (2015). Understanding sex: The right to legal capacity to consent to sex. Disability & Society, 30(10), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1116059
Arstein-Kerslake, A., & Flynn, E. (2016). Legislating consent: Creating an empowering definition of consent to sex that is inclusive of people with cognitive disabilities. Social Asbrock, F. (2010). Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41(2), 76–81.
Asbrock, F. (2010). Stereotypes of social groups in germany in terms of warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000011
Asch, A. (2001). Critical Race Theory, feminism, and disability: Reflections on social justice and personal identity. Ohio State Law Journal, 62, 391–423.
Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD). (2011). Portrayal of people with disabilities. AUCD. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://www.aucd.org/template/page.cfm?id=605
Azzopardi-Lane, C., & Callus, A. (2014). Constructing sexual identities: People with intellectual disability talking about sexuality. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 32–37.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Ginn, H. G., Brown, H. L. P., & Zucker, A. (2021). The sexual rights of others: Majority women’s support for the sexual rights of marginalized women. Journal of Sex Research, 59(7), 862–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1998820
Becker, J. C., & Asbrock, F. (2012). What triggers helping versus harming of ambivalent groups? Effects of the relative salience of warmth versus competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.015
Bernert, D. (2011). Sexuality and disability in the lives of women with intellectual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 29(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-010-9190-4
Black, R., & Kammes, R. (2019). Restrictions, power, companionship, and intimacy: A metasynthesis of people with intellectual disability speaking about sex and relationships. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 57(3), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-57.3.212
Boysen, G. A. (2017). Exploring the relation between masculinity and mental illness stigma using the stereotype content model and BIAS map. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1181600
Boysen, G. A., Chicosky, R. L., & Delmore, E. E. (2020). Dehumanization of mental illness and the stereotype content model. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000256
Brooks, E., & Bates, M. (n.d.). Introducing developmental disability through a disability studies perspective. CUNY Academic Commons. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https://introducingdevelopmentaldisability.commons.gc.cuny.edu/section-3/
Chapin, A. (2020). Of course white women voted for Trump again. The Cut. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https://www.thecut.com/2020/11/many-white-women-still-voted-for-trump-in-2020.html
Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence: New insights and further clarifications. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01222.x
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Bounded empathy: Neural responses to outgroup targets’ (mis)fortunes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 3791–3803. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00069
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2013). Their pain, our pleasure: Stereotype content and schadenfreude. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12179
Coleman, J. M., Brunell, A. B., & Haugen, I. M. (2015). Multiple forms of prejudice: How gender and disability stereotypes influence judgments of disabled women and men. Current Psychology, 34(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9250-5
Collins, P. H. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. Routledge.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
Cuddy, A. J., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x
Doyle, S. (2010). The notion of consent to sexual activity for persons with mental disabilities. The Liverpool Law Review, 31(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-010-9076-7d
Duncan, L. E., & Stewart, A. J. (2007). Personal political salience: The role of personality in collective identity and action. Political Psychology, 28(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00560.x
English, T., Tickle, A., & dasNair, R. (2018). Views and experiences of people with intellectual disabilities regarding intimate relationships: A qualitative metasynthesis. Sexuality and Disability, 36(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-017-9502-z
Evans, D. S., McGuire, B. E., Healy, E., & Carley, S. N. (2009). Sexuality and personal relationships for people with an intellectual disability. Part II: Staff and family carer perspectives. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(11), 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01202.x
Frawley, P., & Wilson, N. J. (2016). Young people with intellectual disability talking about sexuality education and information. Sexuality and Disability, 34(4), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9460-x
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
Fiske, S. T. (2009). From dehumanization and objectification to rehumanization: Neuroimaging studies on the building blocks of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04544.x
Fiske, S. T. (2012). Managing ambivalent prejudices: Smart-but-cold and warm-but-dumb stereotypes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0002716211418444
Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/096372147738825
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
Fitzgerald, W., & Withers, P. (2013). ‘I don’t know what a proper woman means’: What women with intellectual disabilities think about sex, sexuality and themselves. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00715.x
Fortenberry, J. D. (2003). Adolescent sex and the rhetoric of risk. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 293–300). SAGE.
Fortenberry, J. D. (2014). Sexual learning, sexual experience, and healthy adolescent sex. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2014(144), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20061
Fresson, M., Dardenne, B., Geurten, M., & Meulemans, T. (2017). Stereotype content of people with acquired brain injury: Warm but incompetent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(10), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12459
Gill, M. (2010). Rethinking sexual abuse, questions of consent, and intellectual disability. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 7(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-010-0019-9
Gill, M. (2015). Already doing it: Intellectual disability and sexual agency. University of Minnesota Press.
Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/2Fj.1467-9280.2006.01793.x
Healy, E., McGuire, B. E., Evans, D. S., & Carley, S. E. (2009). Sexuality and personal relationships for people with an intellectual disability. Part I: Service-user perspectives. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 905–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01203.x
Higashida, N. (2017). Fall down 7 times get up 8: A young man’s voice from the silence of autism. Random House.
Hollomotz, A., & Committee, T. S. (2009). “May we please have sex tonight?”- people with learning difficulties pursuing privacy in residential group settings. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00512.x
Kansky, J. (2018). What’s love got to do with it?: Romantic relationships and well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
Kelly, C., Crowley, H., & Hamilton, C. (2009). Rights, sexuality and relationships in Ireland: “It’d be nice to be kind of trusted. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00587.x
Lafferty, A., McConkey, R., & Taggart, L. (2013). Beyond friendship: The nature and meaning of close personal relationships as perceived by people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 28(8), 1074–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.758030
Lin, M. H., Kwan, V. S. Y., Cheung, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of Anti-Asian American Stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271320
Lupton, D., & Tulloch, J. (2002). ‘Life would be pretty dull without risk’: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk & Society, 4(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570220137015
Lyden, M. (2007). Assessment of sexual consent capacity. Sexuality and Disability, 25(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-006-9028-2
McCarthy, M. (2014). Women with intellectual disability: Their sexual lives in the 21st century. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 39(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2014.894963
McClelland, A., Flicker, S., Nepveux, D., Nixon, S., Vo, T., Wilson, C., Marshall, Z., Travers, R., & Proudfoot, D. (2012). Seeking safer sexual spaces: Queer and trans young people labeled with intellectual disabilities and the paradoxical risks of restriction. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(6), 808–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.694760
McConkey, R., & Leavey, G. (2013). Irish attitudes to sexual relationships and people with intellectual disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12036
McGuire, B. E., & Bayley, A. A. (2011). Relationships, sexuality and decision-making capacity in people with an intellectual disability. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 24(5), 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e328349bbcb
Mollow, A. (2012). Is sex disability? Queer theory and the disability drive. In R. McRuer & A. Mollow (Eds.), Sex and disability (pp. 285–312). Duke University Press.
Moras, R. (2013). Feminism, rape culture, and intellectual disability: Incorporating sexual self-advocacy and sexual consent capacity. In M. Wappett & K. Arndt (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on disability studies (pp. 189–207). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371973
North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 982–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027843
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) Creating capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press.
Onstot, A. (2019). Capacity to consent: Policies and practices that limit sexual consent for people with Intellectual/Developmental disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 37(4), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09580-9
Parker, L. R., Monteith, M. J., & South, S. C. (2020). Dehumanization, prejudice, and social policy beliefs concerning people with developmental disabilities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1368430218809891
Perske, R. (1972). The dignity of risk and the mentally retarded. Mental Retardation, 10(1), 24–27.
Renwick, R. (2016). Rarely seen, seldom heard: People with intellectual disabilities in the mass media. In K. Scior, S. Werner, & R. Renwick (Eds.), Intellectual disability and stigma (pp. 61–75). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_5
Rushbrooke, E., Murray, C. D., & Townsend, S. (2014). What difficulties are experienced by caregivers in relation to the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.012
Sadler, M. S., Meagor, E. L., & Kaye, K. E. (2012). Stereotypes of mental disorders differ in competence and warmth. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 74(6), 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.019
Sandahl, C. (2003). Queering the crip or cripping the queer?: Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance. Glq, 9(1–2), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25
Schaffhuser, K., Allemand, M., & Martin, M. (2014). Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1948
Shapiro, J. P. (1994). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. Times Books.
Simplican, S. C. (2015). The capacity contract: Intellectual disability and the question of citizenship. University of Minnesota Press.
Turner, G. W., & Crane, B. (2016). Pleasure is paramount: Adults with intellectual disabilities discuss sensuality and intimacy. Sexualities, 19(5–6), 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460715620573
Wang, K., Silverman, A., Gwinn, J. D., & Dovidio, J. F. (2015). Independent or ungrateful? Consequences of confronting patronizing help for people with disabilities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214550345
Wilson, N. J., Parmenter, T. R., Stancliffe, R. J., & Shuttleworth, R. P. (2011). Conditionally sexual: Men and teenage boys with moderate to profound intellectual disability. Sexuality and Disability, 29(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-011-9203-y
Wu, J., & Fiske, S. T. (2019). Disability’s incompetent-but-warm stereotype guides selective empathy: Distinctive cognitive, emotional, and neural signatures. In D. S. Dunn (Ed.), Disability: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 39–51). Oxford.
Yip, T., Cheah, C. S. L., Kiang, L., & Hall, G. C. N. (2021). Rendered invisible: Are Asian Americans a model or a marginalized minority? American Psychologist, 76(4), 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp000085
Zinn, J. O. (2019). The meaning of risk-taking: Key concepts and dimensions. Journal of Risk Research, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351465
Funding
This study was funded by the Vada A. Yeomans endowment at the University of Florida Foundation and a Charles T. Woods faculty grant from the University of Florida Center for Gender, Sexualities, and Women’s Studies Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This study was approved by the University of Florida Human Research Ethics Committee (IRB# IRB202001991).
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ginn, H.G., Bay-Cheng, L.Y., Brown, H.L.P. et al. Prohibited by Pity: Perceptions of the Warmth, Competence, and Sexual Rights of Women Labeled with Intellectual Disability. Sex Res Soc Policy 20, 1407–1418 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00821-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00821-3