Abstract
This article contributes to the literature on adolescent girls’ sexual subjectivities using individual interviews conducted with 30 working-class, Latina teenagers. Latina girls’ accounts of their experiences with sexual debut, current sexual relationships, and sexual abstinence reveal that they construct sexual subjectivities through multiple forms of sexual agency; however, for some, the absence of sexual agency remains an enduring feature of their sexual experiences. The findings illustrate the contradictions embedded in Latina girls’ narratives of sexual agency whereby they often draw on dominant discourses of neoliberalism, heterosexuality, and traditional gender ideology as rhetorical strategies by which to legitimize their sexual decision-making and resist their subjectification as “at-risk” girls. The uptake of these discourses in the narratives of those marginalized at the intersections of gender, race, and class demonstrate the salience of neoliberalism as a form of disciplinary power and have implications for ongoing efforts to foster positive adolescent sexual development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Spanish, words ending in “o” are understood to be masculine and words ending in “a” are understood to be feminine. “Latino” is a masculine word but nonetheless is often used to refer to all people residing in the USA who have origins in Latin America and/or the Hispanophone Caribbean, regardless of gender. In order to mediate the sexism endemic to using the masculine referent for all Latinxs, some writers began using either Latina/o or Latin@ (since the @ looks like both the o + a together); however, this word still reifies a male/female gender binary. In the past 2 years, writers have begun using “Latinxs” and “Latinx” to signal an inclusive, non-binary/gender neutral approach to human diversity (Saunders 2016). In this article, the “x” is used when referring to Latinxs in general and “Latina” and “Latinas” are used when referring to the study population, all of whom identified as female at the time of data collection.
References
Abbott, D. A., & Dalla, R. L. (2008). ‘It’s a choice, simple as that’: youth reasoning for sexual abstinence or activity. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(6), 629–649. doi:10.1080/13676260802225751.
Albanesi, H. P. (2010). Gender and sexual agency: how young people make choices about sex. New York: Lexington Books.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L. T., Armstrong, E. M., & Seeley, J. L. (2014). “Good girls”: gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(2), 100–122. http://doi.org/10.1177/0190272514521220.
Asencio, M. (2002). Sex and sexuality among New York’s Puerto Rican youth. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Barcelos, C. A. (2013). Producing (potentially) pregnant teen bodies: biopower and adolescent pregnancy in the USA. Critical Public Health, 24(4), 476–488.
Barcelos, C. A., & Gubrium, A. C. (2014). Reproducing stories: strategic narratives of teen pregnancy and motherhood. Social Problems, 61(3), 466–481.
Bay-Cheng, L. (2015a). The agency line: a neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7), 279-291. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015b). Living in metaphors, trapped in a matrix: the ramifications of neoliberal ideology for young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7), 332–339. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0541-6.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Fava, N. M. (2014). What puts “at-risk girls” at risk? Sexual vulnerability and social inequality in the lives of girls in the child welfare system. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(2), 116–125. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0142-5.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Fitz, C. C., Alizaga, N. M., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: development of the neoliberal beliefs inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 71–88.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Goodkind, S. A. (2016). Sex and the single (neoliberal) girl: perspectives on being single among socioeconomically diverse young women. Sex Roles, 74(5), 181-194. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0565-y.
Bettie, J. (2014). Women without class: girls, race, and identity (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273. http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750.
Brown, W. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event, 7, 1–43.
Burns, A., Futch, V. A., & Tolman, D. L. (2011). “It’s like doing homework”: academic achievement discourse in adolescent girls’ fellatio narratives. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(3), 239–251. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0062-1.
Carpenter, L. (2005). Virginity lost: an intimate portrait of first sexual experiences. New York: New York University Press.
Chavez, L. R. (2004). A glass half empty: Latina reproduction and public discourse. Human Organization, 63(2), 173–188. http://doi.org/10.17730/humo.63.2.hmk4m0mfey10n51k.
Cheng, S., Hamilton, L., Missari, S., Ma, J., & Kuo, H. (2014). Sexual subjectivity among adolescent girls: social disadvantage and young adult outcomes. Social Forces, 93(2), 515–544. http://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou084.
Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–26. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163.
D’Emilio, J., & Freedman, E. B. (1988). Intimate matters: a history of sexuality in America. New York: Harper & Row.
Dennison, R. P., & Russell, S. T. (2005). Positive perspectives on adolescent sexuality: contributions of the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2(4), 54–59. http://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.4.54.
Duggan, L. (2004). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Elliott, S. (2014). “Who’s to blame?” Constructing the responsible sexual agent in neoliberal sex education. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(3), 211–224.
Erdmans, M. P., & Black, T. (2015). On becoming a teen mom: life before pregnancy. Oakland: University of California Press.
Ferguson, R. A., & Hong, G. K. (2012). The sexual and racial contradictions of neoliberalism. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(7), 1057–1064. doi:10.1080/00918369.2012.699848.
Fields, J. (2008). Risky lessons: sex education and social inequality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: the missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–53.
Fine, M., & McClelland, S. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.
Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2007). The politics of teen women’s sexuality: public policy and the adolescent female body. Emory Law Journal, 56(4), 993–1038.
García, L. (2012). Respect yourself, protect yourself: Latina girls and sexual identity. New York: NYU Press.
Geronimus, A. T. (1997). Teenage childbearing and personal responsibility: an alternative view. Political Science Quarterly, 112(3), 405–430.
Geronimus, A. T. (2003). Damned if you do: culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 57(5), 881–893.
Gómez, C. A., Villaseñor, E., Mann, E. S., Mandic, C. G., Valladares, E. S., Mercado, V., Alcalá, M., & Cardona, V. (2014). The new majority: how will Latino youth succeed in the context of low educational expectations and assumptions of sexual irresponsibility? Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(4), 348–362.
González-López, G. (2004). Fathering Latina sexualities: Mexican men and the virginity of their daughters. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1118–1130. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00082.x.
Grzanka, P. (2014). Intersectionality: a foundations and frontiers reader. Boulder: Westview.
Gubrium, A., Krause, E., & Jernigan, K. (2014). Strategic authenticity and voice: new ways of seeing and being seen as young mothers through digital storytelling. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(4), 337–347. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0161-x.
Gubrium, A. C., Mann, E. S., Borrero, S., Dehlendorf, C., Fields, J., Geronimus, A. T., … Sisson, G. (2015). Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). American Journal of Public Health, e1–e2. http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302900
Harden, K. P. (2014). A sex-positive framework for research on adolescent sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 455–469. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614535934.
Harris, A. (2004). Future girl: young women in the twenty-first century. New York: Routledge.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). (2003). Inside interviewing: new lenses, new concerns. New York: Sage.
Kelly, P. (2001). Youth at risk: processes of individualisation and responsibilisation in the risk society. Discourse, 22(1), 23–33.
Kost, K., & Maddow-Zimet, I. (2016). U.S teenage pregnancies, births, and abortion, 2011: National and state trends by age, race, and ethnicity. Washington: Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/us-teen-pregnancy-state-trends-2011_4.pdf.
Luker, K. (1975). Taking chances. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Luker, K. (1996). Dubious conceptions: the politics of teenage pregnancy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Luker, K. (2006). When sex goes to school: warring views on sex—and sex education—since the 1960s. New York: W.W. Norton.
Mann, E. S. (2013). Regulating Latina youth sexualities through community health centers: discourses and practices of sexual citizenship. Gender & Society, 27(5), 681–703.
Mann, E. S., Cardona, V., & Gomez, C. A. (2015). Beyond the discourse of reproductive choice: narratives of pregnancy resolution among Latina/o teenage parents. Culture, Health & Sexuality. doi:10.1080/13691058.2015.1038853.
Martin, K. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: girls and boys at adolescence. New York: Routledge.
Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: continuity and change. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420. http://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661102.
Maxwell, C., & Aggleton, P. (2010). Agency in action—young women and their sexual relationships in a private school. Gender and Education, 22(3), 327–343. http://doi.org/10.1080/09540250903341120.
Mendoza-Denton, N. (2008). Homegirls: language and cultural practice among Latina youth gangs. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mollborn, S., & Jacobs, J. (2012). “We’ll figure a way”: teenage mothers’ experiences in shifting social and economic contexts. Qualitative Sociology, 35(1), 23–46.
Mollborn, S., & Sennott, C. (2014). Bundles of norms about teen sex and pregnancy. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1283–1299. http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314557086.
O’Sullivan, L. F. (2005). The social and relationship contexts and cognitions associated with romantic and sexual experiences of early-adolescent girls. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2(3), 13–24. http://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.3.13.
O’Sullivan, L. F., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & McKeague, I. W. (2006). The development of the sexual self-concept inventory for early adolescent girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 139–149. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00277.x.
Patten, E. (2016). The nations’ Latino population is defined by its youth. Washington: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/20/the-nations-latino-population-is-defined-by-its-youth/.
Pillow, W. (2004). Unfit subjects: educational policy and the teen mother. New York: Routledge.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.
Rodriguez, M. C., & Morrobel, D. (2004). A review of Latino youth development research and a call for an asset orientation. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26(2), 107–127. http://doi.org/10.1177/0739986304264268.
Russell, S. T. (2005). Conceptualizing positive adolescent sexuality development. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2(3), 4–12. http://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2005.2.3.4.
Saunders, T. (2016). Towards a transnational hip-hop feminist liberatory praxis: a view from the Americas. Social Identities, 22(2), 178–194. http://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1125592.
Schalet, A. (2010). Sexual subjectivity revisited: the significance of relationships in Dutch and American girls’ experiences of sexuality. Gender & Society, 24(3), 304–329. http://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210368400.
Schalet, A. T. (2011). Not under my roof: parents, teens, and the culture of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schalet, A. T., Hunt, G., & Joe-Laidler, K. (2003). Respectability and autonomy: the articulation and meaning of sexuality among the girls in the gang. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(1), 108–143. http://doi.org/10.1177/0891241602238940.
Schalet, A. T., Santelli, J., Russell, S., Halpern, C., Miller, S., Pickering, S., & Hoenig, J. (2014). Broadening the evidence for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and education in the United States. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(10), 1595–1610.
Sisson, G. (2012). Finding a way to offer something more: reframing teen pregnancy prevention. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9(1), 57–69.
Stepler, A., & Brown, A. (2016). Statistical portrait of Hispanics in the United States. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states-key-charts/.
Talashek, M. L., Peragallo, N., Nena, N., Norr, K., & Dancy, B. L. (2004). The context of risky behaviors for Latino youth. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 15(2), 131–138. http://doi.org/10.1177/1043659603262489.
Tolman, D. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tolman, D., Anderson, S., & Belmonte, K. (2015). Mobilizing metaphor: considering complexities, contradictions, and contexts in adolescent girls’ and young women’s sexual agency. Sex Roles, 73(7), 298-310. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0510-0.
Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: a decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255.
Villaseñor, E., Alcalá, M., Valladares, E. S., Torres, M. A., Mercado, V., & Gómez, C. A. (2013). Empower Latino Youth (ELAYO): leveraging youth voice to inform the public debate on pregnancy, parenting and education. Community Literacy Journal, 8(1), 21–39.
Zambrana, R. E. (2011). Latinos in American society: families and communities in transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Ducat, W. H., & Boislard-Pepin, M.-A. (2011). A prospective study of young females’ sexual subjectivity: associations with age, sexual behavior, and dating. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 927–938. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9751-3.
Acknowledgments
The data used in this article were collected as part of a larger study supported by a grant from the Ford Foundation and conducted under the direction of the principal investigator, Cynthia A. Gómez, PhD. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The author wishes to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback as well as all those who made the research possible, including the participants who generously shared their experiences and perspectives.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares she has no conflict of interest.
Funding
This research was funded by a grant from the Ford Foundation.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mann, E.S. Latina Girls, Sexual Agency, and the Contradictions of Neoliberalism. Sex Res Soc Policy 13, 330–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0237-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0237-x