Skip to main content
Log in

Median-Unbiasedness and the Gauss-Markov Property in Finite Population Survey Sampling

  • Published:
Sankhya A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we identify and characterize a family of sampling designs such that, under these designs, the sample median is a median-unbiased estimator of the population median. We first consider the simple random sampling case. A simple random sampling design has the median-unbiasedness property. Moreover, upon deleting samples from the simple random sampling case and imposing a uniform probability distribution on the remaining samples, the sample median is a median-unbiased estimator provided that the support meets a minimum threshold. However, there are other sampling designs, such as those based on balanced incomplete block designs, that do not need to meet the minimum threshold requirement to have the sample median be a median-unbiased estimator. We construct non-uniformly distributed sampling designs that have the median-unbiasedness property as well. In fact, the sample median is a best linear unbiased estimator within the class of linear median unbiased estimators. We show the sample median follows the Gauss-Markov Property under a simple random sampling design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassett, G. Jr (1992). The Gauss Markov property for the median. In: Dodge Y (ed) L1-Statistial Analysis and Related Methods, North-Holland, pp 23–31.

  • Brown, G. (1947). On small sample estimation. Ann Math Statist 18, 582–585.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foody, W. and Hedayat, A. (1977). On theory and applications of BIB designs with repeated blocks. Ann Statist 5, 932–945.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foody, W. and Hedayat, A. (1988). A graphical proof of the nonexistence of BIB(7,b, r, 3,λ∣16) designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 20, 77–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, W. (1975). The inverse hypogeometric – a useful model. Statist Neerlandica 29, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. (1978). A generalization of sum composition: self-orthogonal Latin square design with sub-self-orthogonal Latin square designs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 24, 202–210.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. (1979). Sampling designs with reduced support sizes. In: Rustagi J (ed) Optimizing Methods in Statistics, Academic Press, pp 273–288.

  • Hedayat, A. and Hwang, H. (1984a). BIB(8, 56, 21, 3, 6) and BIB(10, 30, 9, 3, 2) designs with repeated blocks. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A36, 73–91.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. and Hwang, H. (1984b). Construction of BIB designs with various support sizes – with special emphasis for v = 8 and k = 4. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 36, 163–173.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. and Khosrovshahi, G. (1981). An algebraic study of BIB designs: A complete solution for v = 6 and k = 3. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 30, 43–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. and Li, S.Y.R. (1979). The trade-off method in the construction of BIB designs with variable support sizes. Ann. Stat. 7, 1277–1287.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. and Robieson, W. (1998). Exclusion of an undesirable sample from the support of a simple random sample. Am. Stat. 52, 41–43.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. and Sinha, B. (1991). Design and Inference in Finite Population Sampling. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A., Stufken, J. and Landgev, I. (1989). The possible support sizes for BIB designs with v = 8 and k = 4. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 51, 258–267.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A., Cheng, H. and Pajda-De La O, J. (2019). Existence of unbiased estimation for the minimum, maximum, and median in finite population sampling. Statistics and Probability Letters 153, 192–195.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.L., Kemp, A.W. and Kotz, S. (2005). Univariate discrete distributions. 3rd edn, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons.

  • Pitman, E. (1939). The estimation of the location and scale parameters of a continuous population of any given form. Biometrika 30, 391–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, S. (1979). On the construction of noninvariant balanced sampling designs. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 28, 109–124.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, B. (1976). On balanced sampling schemes. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 25, 129–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hansheng Cheng for discussions and initial work leading to some aspects of this paper; we thank Cheng Ouyang and Raymond Mess for useful discussions. We thank the anonymous referees for their careful reading of the paper and for their numerous suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Pajda-De La O.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

A.S. Hedayat’s work was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation Grant #1809681. Jennifer Pajda-De La O has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was partly supported by U.S. National Science Foundation Grant #1809681.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hedayat, A.S., Pajda-De La O, J. Median-Unbiasedness and the Gauss-Markov Property in Finite Population Survey Sampling. Sankhya A 83, 696–713 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-020-00221-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-020-00221-4

Keywords

AMS (2000) subject classification

Navigation