Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion of “concentration for (regularized) empirical risk minimization” by Sara van de Geer and Martin Wainwright

  • Published:
Sankhya A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sara van de Geer and Martin Wainwright combine astute convexity arguments and concentration inequalities for suprema of empirical processes to establish generic concentration inequalities for excess penalized risk. This note discusses possible refinements and extensions. In the Gaussian sequence model, concentration of reconstruction error is likely to be improvable and might depend on the effective sparsity of the typical penalized estimator. In the general setting, concentration of excess penalized risk should be complemented by concentration of empirical excess penalized risk. Recent results on penalized least-square estimation pave the way to such a extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arlot, S. and Massart, P. (2009). Data-driven calibration of penalties for least-squares regression. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 245–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellec, P. C., Lecué, G. and Tsybakov, A. B. (2017). Towards the study of least squares estimators with convex penalty ArXiv e-prints.

  • Bobkov, S. and Ledoux, M. (1997). Poincaré’s inequalities and Talagrands’s concentration phenomenon for the exponential distribution. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 107, 383–400.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boucheron, S., Lugosi, G. and Massart, P. (2013). Concentration inequalities Oxford University Press.

  • Boucheron, S. and Massart, P. (2010). A high-dimensional Wilks phenomenon. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 148, 1–29.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann, P. and van de Geer, S. (2011). Statistics for high-dimensional data. Springer, Heidelberg.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. (2014). A new perspective on least squares under convex constraint. Ann. Statist. 42, 6, 2340–2381.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Wainwright, M. (2015). Statistical learning with sparsity CRC press.

  • Koltchinskii, V. (2006). Localized rademacher complexities and oracle inequalities in risk minimization. Annals of Statistics 34, 2593–2656.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux, M. (2001). The concentration of measure phenomenon. American Mathematical Society, Providence RI.

  • Lehmann, E. L. and Casella, G. (1998). Theory of point estimation, second edn. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Massart, P. and Nedelec, E. (2006). Risk bounds for classification. Annals of Statistics 34, 5, 2326.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saumard, A. (2013). Optimal model selection in heteroscedastic regression using piecewise polynomial functions. Electron. J. Stat. 7, 1184–1223.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van de Geer, S. and Wainwright, M. (2017). On concentration for (regularized) empirical risk minimization Sankhya.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Boucheron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boucheron, S. Discussion of “concentration for (regularized) empirical risk minimization” by Sara van de Geer and Martin Wainwright. Sankhya A 79, 201–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-017-0113-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-017-0113-7

Keywords and phrases.

AMS (2000) subject classification.

Navigation