Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

TMEM92 acts as an immune-resistance and prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer from the perspective of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine

  • Research
  • Published:
EPMA Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic cancer presents extremely poor prognosis due to the difficulty of early diagnosis, low resection rate, and high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Immune checkpoint blockades have been widely used in many cancer types but showed limited efficacy in pancreatic cancer. The current study aimed to evaluate the landscape of tumor microenvironment (TME) of pancreatic cancer and identify the potential markers of prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy which might contribute to improve the targeted therapy strategy and efficacy in pancreatic cancer in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM).

Methods

In the current study, a total of 382 pancreatic samples from the datasets of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were selected. LM22 gene signature matrix was applied to quantify the fraction of immune cells based on “CIBERSORT” algorithm. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) algorithm was applied to confirm the hub-network of immune-resistance phenotype. A nomogram model based on COX and Logistic regression was constructed to evaluate the prognostic value and the predictive value of hub-gene in immune-response. The role of transmembrane protein 92 (TMEM92) in regulating cell proliferation was evaluated by MTS assay. Western blot and Real-time PCR were applied to assess the biological effects of PD-L1 inhibition by TMEM92. Moreover, the effect of TMEM92 in immunotherapy was evaluated with PBMC co-culture and by MTS assay.

Results

Two tumor-infiltrating immune cell (TIIC) phenotypes were identified and a weighted gene co-expression network was constructed to confirm the 167 gene signatures correlated with immune-resistance TIIC subtype. TMEM92 was further identified as a core gene of 167 gene signature network based on MCODE algorithm. High TMEM92 expression was significantly correlated with unfavorable prognosis, characterizing by immune resistance. A nomogram model and external validation confirmed that TMEM92 was an independent prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. An elevated tumor mutation burden (TMB), mostly is consistent with commonly mutations of KRAS and TP53, was found in the high TMEM92 group. The predictive role of TMEM92 in immunotherapeutic response was also confirmed by IMvigor210 datasets. In addition, the specific biological roles of TMEM92 in cancer was explored in vitro. The results showed that abnormal overexpression of TMEM92 was significantly associated with the poor survival rate of pancreatic cancer. Moreover, we demonstrated that TMEM92 inhibit tumour immune responses of the anti-PD-1 antibody with PBMC co-culture.

Conclusion

The current study explored for the first time the immune-resistance phenotype of pancreatic cancer and identified TMEM92 as an innovative marker in predicting clinical outcomes and immunotherapeutic efficacy. These findings not only help to recognize high-risk and immune-resistance population which could be supplied targeted prevention, but also provide personalized medical services by intervening TMEM92 function to improve the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. In addition, the biological role of TMEM92 might reveal the potential molecular mechanisms of pancreatic cancer and lead to a novel sight for development of a PPPM approach for pancreatic cancer management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA, GEO, and IMvigor210 repository: TCGA (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov); GEO (GSE57495: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE57495; GSE62452:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE62452; GSE85916: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE85916); IMvigor210 (http://research-pub.gene.com/IMvigor210CoreBiologies).

Code availability

All software applications used are included in this article.

Abbreviations

TME:

Tumor microenvironment

TIIC:

Tumor-infiltrating immune cells

WGCNA:

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis

MCODE:

Molecular complex detection

GEO:

Gene Expression Omnibus

GO:

Gene Ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

PD-1:

Programmed cell death protein 1

PD-L1:

Programmed cell death ligand 1

TMEM92:

Transmembrane protein 92

TMB:

Tumor mutation burden

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park W, Chawla A, O’Reilly EM. Pancreatic cancer: a review. JAMA. 2021;326(9):851–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Grech G, Zhan X, Yoo BC, Bubnov R, Hagan S, Danesi R, et al. EPMA position paper in cancer: current overview and future perspectives. EPMA J. 2015;6(1):9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagaraju GP, Malla RR, Basha R, Motofei IG. Contemporary clinical trials in pancreatic cancer immunotherapy targeting PD-1 and PD-L1. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021; S1044–579X(21)00270–4.

  5. Uhlitz F, Zamarin D. Rejuvenating dysfunctional T cells in ovarian cancer: CD28 is the license to kill. Cancer Cell. 2021;S1535–6108(21):00562–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang B, Vogelzang A, Miyajima M, Sugiura Y, Wu Y, Chamoto K, et al. B cell-derived GABA elicits IL-10+ macrophages to limit anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2021;599(7885):471–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Au L, Hatipoglu E, Robert de Massy M, Litchfield K, Beattie G, Rowan A, et al. TRACERx Renal Consortium. Determinants of anti-PD-1 response and resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2021;39(11):1497–518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen NT, Huang K, Zeng H, Jing J, Wang R, Fang S, et al. Nano-optogenetic engineering of CAR T cells for precision immunotherapy with enhanced safety. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16(12):1424–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheiner B, Pomej K, Kirstein MM, Hucke F, Finkelmeier F, Waidmann O, et al. Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy - development and validation of the CRAFITY score. J Hepatol. 2021;76(2):353–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359(6382):1350–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazur PK, Siveke JT. Genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic cancer: unravelling tumour biology and progressing translational oncology. Gut. 2012;61(10):1488–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stromnes IM, Hulbert A, Pierce RH, Greenberg PD, Hingorani SR. T-cell localization, activation, and clonal expansion in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5(11):978–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang ZB, Huang JM, Xie YJ, Zhang YZ, Chang C, Lai HL, et al. Evodiamine suppresses non-small cell lung cancer by elevating CD8+ T cells and downregulating the MUC1-C/PD-L1 axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmit K, Michiels C. TMEM proteins in cancer: a review. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Koteluk O, Bielicka A, Lemańska Ż, Jóźwiak K, Klawiter W, Mackiewicz A, et al. The landscape of transmembrane protein family members in head and neck cancers: their biological role and diagnostic utility. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(19):4737.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carroll J, He J, Ding S, Fearnley IM, Walker JE. TMEM70 and TMEM242 help to assemble the rotor ring of human ATP synthase and interact with assembly factors for complex I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(13):e2100558118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo S, Wang X, Bai M, Jiang W, Zhang Z, Chen Y, et al. The conserved autoimmune-disease risk gene TMEM39A regulates lysosome dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(6):e2011379118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Duan J, Qian Y, Fu X, Chen M, Liu K, Liu H, et al. TMEM106C contributes to the malignant characteristics and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(4):5585–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao J, Wu X, Zhou X, Deng R, Ma Y. TMEM205 is an independent prognostic factor and is associated with immune cell infiltrates in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Genet. 2020;11:575776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Listing H, Mardin WA, Wohlfromm S, Mees ST, Haier J. MiR-23a/-24-induced gene silencing results in mesothelial cell integration of pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(1):131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang S, Zang D, Cheng Y, Li Z, Yang B, Guo T. Identification of key gene and pathways for the prediction of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer by co-expression analysis. J Cancer. 2020;11(10):3041–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hazra A, Gogtay N. Biostatistics series module 3: comparing groups: numerical variables. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61(3):251–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(21):7252–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu L, Zhang Y, Liu J, Qu J, Hu X, Zhang F, et al. TRAIL-activated EGFR by Cbl-b-regulated EGFR redistribution in lipid rafts antagonises TRAIL-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(17):3288–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zang D, Zhang C, Li C, Fan Y, Li Z, Hou K, et al. LPPR4 promotes peritoneal metastasis via Sp1/integrin α/FAK signaling in gastric cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(3):1026–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Marcq E, Audenaerde JRV, Waele J, Jacobs J, Loenhout JV, Cavents G, et al. Building a bridge between chemotherapy and immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: investigating the effect of chemotherapy on immune checkpoint expression. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(17):4182.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marcq E, Van Audenaerde JRM, De Waele J, Merlin C, Pauwels P, van Meerbeeck JP, et al. The search for an interesting partner to combine with PD-L1 blockade in mesothelioma: focus on Tim-3 and LAG-3. Cancers. 2021;13(2):282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka A, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy. CELL RES. 2017;27(1):109–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jairath NK, Farha MW, Jairath R, Harms PW, Tsoi LC, Tejasvi T. Prognostic value of intratumoral lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and M0 macrophage enrichment in tumor immune microenvironment of melanoma. Melanoma Manag. 2020; 7(4):Mmt51.

  31. Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic features of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Cell. 2016;165(1):35–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ayers M, Lunceford J, Nebozhyn M, Murphy E, Loboda A, Kaufman DR, et al. IFN-γ-related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(8):2930–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T, Yuan J, Zaretsky JM, Desrichard A, et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2189–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, Kvistborg P, Makarov V, Havel JJ, et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science (New York, NY). 2015;348(6230):124–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mayakonda A, Lin DC, Assenov Y, Plass C, Koeffler HP. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 2018;28(11):1747–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, La Vecchia C, Johnson CD, Biankin AV, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dreyer SB, Chang DK, Bailey P, Biankin AV. Pancreatic cancer genomes: implications for clinical management and therapeutic development. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(7):1638–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Golubnitschaja O, Baban B, Boniolo G, Wang W, Bubnov R, Kapalla M, et al. Medicine in the early twenty-first century: paradigm and anticipation - EPMA position paper 2016. EPMA J. 2016;7(1):23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Foley K, Kim V, Jaffee E, Zheng L. Current progress in immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;381(1):244–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pico de Coaña Y, Choudhury A, Kiessling R. Checkpoint blockade for cancer therapy: revitalizing a suppressed immune system. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21(8):482–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Morrison AH, Byrne KT, Vonderheide RH. Immunotherapy and prevention of pancreatic cancer. Trends Cancer. 2018;4(6):418–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ino Y, Yamazaki-Itoh R, Shimada K, Iwasaki M, Kosuge T, Kanai Y, et al. Immune cell infiltration as an indicator of the immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(4):914–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mahajan UM, Langhoff E, Goni E, Costello E, Greenhalf W, Halloran C, et al. Immune cell and stromal signature associated with progression-free survival of patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1625–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stromnes IM, Hulbert A, Pierce RH, Greenberg PD, Hingorani SR. T-cell localization, activation, and clonal expansion in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5(11):978–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang X, He Y, Jiang Y, Bao Y, Chen Q, Xie D, et al. TMEM229A suppresses non-small cell lung cancer progression via inactivating the ERK pathway. Oncol Rep. 2021;46(2):176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Shiraishi T, Ikeda K, Tsukada Y, Nishizawa Y, Sasaki T, Ito M, et al. High expression of TMEM180, a novel tumour marker, is associated with poor survival in stage III colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lin MZ, Teng LL, Sun XL, Zhang LP, Chen F, Yu LJ. Transmembrane protein 92 performs a tumor-promoting function in breast carcinoma by contributing to the cell growth, invasion, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Tissue Cell. 2020;67:101415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Buscail L, Bournet B, Cordelier P. Role of oncogenic KRAS in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(3):153–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Li J, Byrne KT, Yan F, Yamazoe T, Chen Z, Baslan T, et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic factors underlie heterogeneity of immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapy. Immunity. 2018;49(1):178–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang X, Shi M, Chen T, Zhang B. Characterization of the immune cell infiltration landscape in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to aid immunotherapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;22:298–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zeng D, Li M, Zhou R, Zhang J, Sun H, Shi M, et al. Tumor microenvironment characterization in gastric cancer identifies prognostic and immunotherapeutically relevant gene signatures. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(5):737–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Science and Technology Plan Project of Liaoning Province (2021-BS-102); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81801661).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Guan Wang and Simeng Zhang designed the experiments. Guan Wang, Simeng Zhang, and Qiaoyun Chu wrote the manuscript. Mengzhu Lv and Ce Li performed the experiments. Simeng Zhang and Xing Wan performed the bioinformatics analysis. All authors contributed to the study design and data interpretation and have reviewed the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiaoyun Chu or Guan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Data retrieved from the GEO and TCGA controlled-access database was collected using tumors from patients who provided informed consent based on guidelines laid out by the GEO and TCGA Ethics, Law and Policy Group. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of China Medical University, and all procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical principles (protocol #: 2015PS63K).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

13167_2022_287_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file1 (JPG 3538 KB) Supplementary Figure 1. (A-D) Consensus matrixes of 382 pancreatic cancer samples for each k (k = 2–5) in classifying TIIC clusters, displaying the clustering stability using 1000 iterations of hierarchical clustering. (E) 2 pairs of gene modules were merged according to their similarity base on the threshold (Red line). (F) The genedendrogram was constructed by hierarchical clustering base on dissTOM of genes. (G) The correlation of epigengenes in green module with TIIC cluster trait. (H-I) Probability of survival at 1 (H) and 3 (I) years in the total cohort.

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 145 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Wan, X., Lv, M. et al. TMEM92 acts as an immune-resistance and prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer from the perspective of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA Journal 13, 519–534 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-022-00287-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-022-00287-0

Keywords

Navigation