Abstract
A study of culturally-embedded perceptual responses to aesthetic value indicates that learned perceptual capacities can secure compliance with social norms. We should therefore resist the temptation to draw a line between cognitive processes, such as perception, that can adapt to differences in physical environments, and cognitive processes, such as economic decision-making, that are shaped by social norms. Compliance with social norms is a result of perceptual learning when that same compliance modifies perceptible features of the physical environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Euro” denotes Europe and its descendant cultures.
References
Ball, Karlene and Robert Sekuler. 1982. A Specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. Science 218. 4573: 697–698.
Baxandall, Michael. 1972. Painting and experience in fifteenth-century Italy: A Primer in the social history of pictorial style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Becker, Howard S. 2008. Art worlds. 2nd ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Benovsky, Jiri. 2012. Aesthetic supervenience vs aesthetic grounding. Estetika 49 (2): 166–178.
Berlin, Brent. 1992. Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bicchieri, Cristina. 2006. The Grammar of society: The Nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bullot, Nicolas, and Rolf Reber. 2013. The Artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (2): 123–137.
Burnston, Daniel. 2017. Cognitive penetration and the cognition–perception interface. Synthese 194 (9): 3645–3668.
Carbon, Claus-Christian. 2011. Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. i-Perception 2: 708–719.
Dougherty, Janet W. D. 1978. Salience and relativity in classification. American Ethnologist 5 (1): 66–80.
Epstein, Brian. 2015. The Ant trap: Rebuilding the foundations of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farkas, András. 2002. Prototypicality-effect in surrealist paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts 20 (2): 127–136.
Fechner, Gustav. 1876. Vorschule der ästhetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
Folstein, Jonathan R., Isabel Gauthier, and Thomas J. Palmeri. 2010. Mere exposure alters category learning of novel objects. Frontiers in Psychology 1 (40): 1–6.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gauthier, Isabel, Michael J. Tarr, and Daniel Bub, eds. 2010. Perceptual expertise: Bridging brain and behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstone, Robert L. 1998. Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1): 585–612.
Gombrich, E.H. 1960. Art and illusion: A Study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Guala, Francesco. 2016. Understanding institutions: The Science and philosophy of living together. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Henrich, Joseph, Steven J. Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. The Weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33.2–3: 61–83 and 111–123.
Holm, Bill, and Willie Seaweed. 1983. Smoky-Top: The Art and times of Willie Seaweed. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Jonaitis, Aldona. 1999. Northwest Coast totem poles. In Unpacking culture: Art and commodity in colonial and postcolonial worlds, ed. Ruth B. Phillips and Christopher Steiner, 104–121. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Khemlani, Sangeet S., N.Y. Louis Lee, and Monica Bucciarellic. 2010. Determinants of cognitive variability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2–3): 97–98.
Layton, Robert. 2011. Aesthetics: The Approach from social anthropology. In The Aesthetic mind: Philosophy and psychology, ed. Elisabeth Schellekens and Peter Goldie, 208–222. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leder, Helmut, Benno Belke, Andries Oeberst, and Dorothee Augustin. 2004. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Psychology 95 (4): 489–508.
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2014. Beyond art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2018. Being for beauty: Aesthetic agency and value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2020. Desolation Sound: Social practices of natural beauty. Thought 9 (4): 266–273.
Machery, Edouard. 2010. Explaining why experimental behavior varies across cultures: A missing step in “The Weirdest people in the world?”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2–3): 101–102.
Martindale, Colin, and Kathleen Moore. 1988. Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 (4): 661–670.
Matthen, Mohan. 2020. Art forms emerging: An Approach to evaluative diversity in art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (3): 303–318.
Masuda, Takahiko, Richard Gonzalez, Letty Kwan, and Richard E. Nisbett. 2008. Culture and aesthetic preference: Comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (9): 1260–1275.
Ransom, Madeleine. 2020a. Attentional weighting in perceptual learning. Journal of Consciousness Studies 27 (7–8): 236–248.
Ransom, Madeleine. 2020b. Waltonian perceptualism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1): 66–70.
Ransom, Madeleine. forthcoming. Aesthetic perception and the puzzle of training. Synthese.
Richerson, Peter J., and Richard Boyd. 2005. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rochat, Philippe. 2010. What is really wrong with a priori claims of universality? Sampling, validity, process level, and the irresistible drive to reduce. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2–3): 107–108.
Rosch, Eleanor, Carolyn B. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray, David M. Johnson, and Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8 (3): 382–439.
Rozin, Paul. 2010. The Weirdest people in the world are a harbinger of the future of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2–3): 108–109.
Segall, Marshall H., Donald T. Campbell, and Melville J. Herskovits. 1966. The Influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Sibley, Frank. 1959. Aesthetic concepts. Philosophical Review 68 (4): 421–450.
Sibley, Frank. 1965. Aesthetic and nonaesthetic. Philosophical Review 74 (2): 135–159.
Siegel, Susanna. 2010. The Contents of visual experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stokes, Dustin. 2014. Cognitive penetration and the perception of art. Dialectica 68 (1): 1–34.
Tanaka, James W., and Marjorie Taylor. 1991. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology 23 (3): 457–482.
Vogel, Susan Mullin. 1997. Baule: African art, western eyes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Walton, Kendall. 1970. Categories of art. Philosophical Review 79 (3): 334–367.
Acknowledgements
We thank an anonymous referee and the editors of the special issue for some helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
