Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness

  • Theory/Conceptual
  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increasing trend among consumers toward using two or more media simultaneously, a phenomenon known as media multitasking. The majority of the extant literature agrees that media multitasking has detrimental effects on advertising effectiveness. However, opportunities exist for reducing these negative effects or even creating effects favorable to advertising outcomes. Nevertheless, the literature on media multitasking during advertising exposure is highly fragmented and findings are inconclusive. This literature review synthesizes the extant studies on message processing in media multitasking situations. It develops a comprehensive conceptual framework on the effects of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness, with particular attention to mediating processes and moderating variables. The conceptual model explains the circumstances under which individuals devote voluntary or involuntary attention to advertisements during media multitasking, advances knowledge on the role of different sensory modalities, and reveals how the two types of information processing complement each other during simultaneous media usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angell, R., Gorton, M., Sauer, J., Bottomley, P., & White, J. (2016). Don't distract me when I'm media multitasking: Toward a theory for raising advertising recall and recognition. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhi, F., Rohm, A. J., & Sultan, F. (2010). Tuning in and tuning out: Media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(4), 316–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, S., Robinson, J. A., Wooley, B., & Varan, D. (2017). The effects of social TV on television advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology (century psychology series). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuckels, E., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). How media multitasking reduces advertising irritation: The moderating role of the Facebook wall. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2011). Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(9), 527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2017). Media multitasking: How visual cues affect switching behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L. (2015). The programmatic reality of syncing TV and online ads. Retrieved November 11, 2017 from http://programmaticadvertising.org/2015/05/14/the-programmatic-reality-of-syncing-tv-and-online-ads/.

  • Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., & Dovale, C. (2010). When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1097–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Benitez, S., & Chang, J. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 483–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. (2016). Why do young people multitask with multiple media? Explicating the relationships among sensation seeking, needs, and media multitasking behavior. Media Psychology, 20(4), 685–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. (2017). The influence of media multitasking on the impulse to buy: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinchanachokchai, S., Duff, B. R., & Sar, S. (2015). The effect of multitasking on time perception, enjoyment, and ad evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, R. M., Finn, A., & Olsen, G. D. (2007). Investigating the simultaneous presentation of advertising and television programming. Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. G., Bickham, D., Ross, C. S., & Rich, M. (2015). Multitasking with television among adolescents. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 130–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and the allocation of attention. In: A. Baum, J. E. Singer, & S. Valins (Eds.): Vol. 1, The urban environment. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (pp. 2–29).

  • Collins, R. L. (2008). Media multitasking: Issues posed in measuring the effects of television sexual content exposure. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(1), 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Wiginton, J. C. (1979). Language and organization. The Academy of Management Review, 4(2), 179 (1979)–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte LLC Inc. (2016). Digital democracy survey: A multi-generational view of consumer technology, media, and telecom trends (10th ed.). Retrieved January 14, 2018 from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/se/Documents/technology-media-telecommunications/Digital-Democracy-Survey-DDS_Executive_Summary_Report_Final_2015-04-20-tmt.pdf.

  • Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science (New York, N.Y.), 298, 1191–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, B. R.-L., & Sar, S. (2015). Seeing the big picture: Multitasking and perceptual processing influences on ad recognition. Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, B. R.-L., Yoon, G., Wang, Z., & Anghelcev, G. (2014). Doing it all: An exploratory study of predictors of media multitasking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(1), 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, R. (2017). Programmatic advertising is under review. Retrieved March 26, 2018 from http://www.businessinsider.de/programmatic-advertising-under-review-2017-1?r=US&IR=T.

  • emarketer. (2016). Attention divided in the UK living room. Retrieved February 10, 2017 from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Attention-Divided-UK-Living-Room/1013876.

  • emarketer. (2017). US adults now spend 12 hours 7 minutes a day consuming media. Retrieved February 10, 2017 from https://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Adults-Now-Spend-12-Hours-7-Minutes-Day-Consuming-Media/1015775.

  • Garaus, M., Wagner, U., & Bäck, A.-M. (2017). The effect of media multitasking on advertising message effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 34(2), 138–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. C. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 793–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, G. J., Hu, Y., Allen, R. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2018). Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: Perceptual recency versus executive control. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424(1), 64-75.

  • Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S.-H. (2018). Multitasking and task performance: Roles of task hierarchy, sensory interference, and behavioral response. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y., Kim, H., & Jeong, S.-H. (2014). Why do media users multitask? Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S.-H., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10(3), 364–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S.-H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S.-H., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Multitasking and persuasion: The role of structural interference. Media Psychology, 18(4), 451–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S.-H., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Media multitasking effects on cognitive vs. attitudinal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 599–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1–6 Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., & Haas, H. (1973). On the use of mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38(2), 164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, B., & Johnson, J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazakova, S., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., & Labyt, C. (2016). The impact of media multitasking on the cognitive and attitudinal responses to television commercials: The moderating role of type of advertising appeal. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 403–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. L., & Most, S. B. (2015). Affective stimuli capture attention regardless of categorical distinctiveness: An emotion-induced blindness study. Visual Cognition, 23(1–2), 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononova, A. (2013). Multitasking across borders: A cross-national study of media multitasking behaviors, its antecedents, and outcomes. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1688–1710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononova, A., & Alhabash, S. (2012). When one medium is not enough: Media use and media multitasking among college students in Kuwait. Journal of Middle East Media, 8(1), 2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononova, A., & Chiang, Y.-H. (2015). Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among internet users in the United States and Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kononova, A., Zasorina, T., Diveeva, N., Kokoeva, A., & Chelokyan, A. (2014). Multitasking goes global: Multitasking with traditional and new electronic media and attention to media messages among college students in Kuwait, Russia, and the USA. International Communication Gazette, 76(8), 617–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber-Riel, W. (1979). Activation research: Psychobiological approaches in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(4), 240 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaukonyte, J., Teixeira, T., & Wilbur, K. C. (2015). Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Science, 34(3), 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S. B. (1986). The role of attention in mediating the effect of advertising on attribute importance. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 174 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclnnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maity, M., & Dass, M. & Kumar, P. (2018). The impact of media richness on consumer information search and choice. Journal of Business Research, 87, 36–45.

  • Mantyla, T. (2013). Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability. Psychological Science, 24(4), 514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Education & Psychology, 91(2), 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L., Koff, R., Eikoff, J., Diermyer, C., & Christakis, D. A. (2012). Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1097–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, R. C., & Dozier, D. M. (2016). Second screen effects. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23(2), 214–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenkov, G. Y., & Scott, M. L. (2014). “So cute I could eat it up”: Priming effects of cute products on indulgent consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 326–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo, V., Tornquist, M., Cameron, T., & Chiappe, D. (2015). Effects of media multi-tasking with Facebook on the enjoyment and encoding of TV episodes. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 629–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R., Nass, C., Meheula, L., Rance, M., Kumar, A., Bamford, H., Nass, M., Simha, A., Stillerman, B., Yang, S., & Zhou, M. (2012). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C. G. (1980). Order of report in bisensory verbal short-term memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34(2), 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17(4), 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, R., Wedel, M. & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48–60.

  • Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M. (2002). Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Science, 48(6), 765–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilotta, J. J., & Schultz, D. E. (2005). Simultaneous media experience and synesthesia. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(01), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilotta, J. J., Schultz, D. E., Drenik, G., & Rist, P. (2004). Simultaneous media usage: A critical consumer orientation to media planning. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(3), 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, F. (2015). 9 in 10 Americans multitask while watching TV. Retrieved November 8, 2018 from https://www.statista.com/chart/3485/tv-multitasking/.

  • Robinson, H. R. (2017a). Individuals’ preference for multiple media use – Underlying motives. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(4), 435–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. R. (2017b). Towards an enhanced understanding of the behavioural phenomenon of multiple media use. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(9–10), 699–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1987). Advertising and promotion management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenking, B. (2017). Boring is bad: Effects of emotional content and multitasking on enjoyment and memory. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 488–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115(1), 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, A., & Voyer, B. G. (2012). Two minds, three ways: Dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology. AMS Review, 2(2–4), 48–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J. M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS One, 8(1), e54402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail. Communication Research, 18(4), 487–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segijn, C. M., Voorveld, H. A., & Smit, E. G. (2016). The underlying mechanisms of multiscreening effects. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segijn, C. M., Voorveld, H. A. M., Vandeberg, L., & Smit, E. G. (2017a). The battle of the screens: Unraveling attention allocation and memory effects when multiscreening. Human Communication Research, 43(2), 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segijn, C. M., Voorveld, H. A. M., Vandeberg, L., Pennekamp, S. F., & Smit, E. G. (2017b). Insight into everyday media use with multiple screens. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 779–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segijn, C. M., Voorveld, H. A., & Smit, E. G. (2017c). How related multiscreening could positively affect advertising outcomes. Journal of Advertising, 46(4), 455–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (2002). Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus-based affect on choice behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 342–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, E. G., Segijn, C. M., van de Giessen, W., Wottrich, V. M., Vandeberg, L., & Voorveld, H. A. M. (2017). Media multitasking and the role of task relevance in background advertising processing. In V. Zabkar & M. Eisend (Eds.), European advertising academy (Advances in advertising research VIII: Challenges in an age of dis-engagement) (Vol. 8, pp. 197–212). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, J. (2013). Media multitasking performance: Role of message relevance and formatting cues in online environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 888–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, J., Nakazawa, M., & Chen, Y.-W. (2016). Online, mixed, and offline media multitasking: Role of cultural, socio-demographic, and media factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 720–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nielsen Company. (2014). Meet today's digital consumers. Retrieved October 16, 2016 from AC Nielsen website: http://de.slideshare.net/tinhanhvy/the-digital-consumer-report-2014-nielsen.

  • van Cauwenberge, A., Schaap, G., & van Roy, R. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorveld, H. A. (2011). Media multitasking and the effectiveness of combining online and radio advertising. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2200–2206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorveld, H. A., & van der Goot, M. (2013). Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(3), 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorveld, H. A., & Viswanathan, V. (2015). An observational study on how situational factors influence media multitasking with TV: The role of genres, dayparts, and social viewing. Media Psychology, 18(4), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Irwin, M., Cooper, C., & Srivastava, J. (2015). Multidimensions of media multitasking and adaptive media selection. Human Communication Research, 41(1), 102–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webwire. (2017). TUI UK is the first brand to sign up to Instant Ad Sync with TVGuide.co.uk. Retrieved March 26, 2018 from https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=207477.

  • Wickens, C. D. (1981). Processing resources in attention, dual task performance and workload assessment. Technical report, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved March 3, 2018 from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA102719. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.

  • Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. T., Baack, D. W., & Till, B. D. (2015). Creativity, attention and the memory for brands: An outdoor advertising field study. International Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 232–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wywy.com. (2015). Suzuki drives website conversions with TV-synced paid search campaigns. Retrieved November 2, 2016 from http://wywy.com/success-stories/suzuki-drives-website-conversions-with-tv-synced-paid-search-campaigns/

  • Yoon, S., Choi, Y. K., & Song, S. (2011). When intrusive can be likable. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Jeong, S.-H., & Fishbein, M. (2010). Situational factors competing for attention. Journal of Media Psychology, 22(1), 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Mao, M., Rau, P.-L. P., Choe, P., Bela, L., & Wang, F. (2013). Exploring factors influencing multitasking interaction with multiple smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2579–2588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates distributed by the Halsted press division of Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Management, Modul University Vienna, Am Kahlenberg 1, 1190, Vienna, Austria

    Marion Garaus

Authors
  1. Marion Garaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Garaus.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garaus, M. The influence of media multitasking on advertising effectiveness. AMS Rev 10, 244–259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-019-00155-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-019-00155-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation