Abstract
Use of the term “isolated wetlands” in the U.S. Supreme Court’s SWANCC decision created confusion, since it could imply functional isolation. In response, the term “geographically isolated wetlands” (GIWs) – wetlands surrounded by uplands – was introduced in 2003. A recent article revisits the term, concluding that it is a misnomer that adds to the confusion. Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) type and non-adjacency to jurisdictional waters are suggested as alternatives. To address this issue, I pose two questions: is there a need to identify wetlands surrounded by uplands and what to call them? Regarding the former, there is a legal/regulatory need resulting from the Court’s Rapanos decision: to help determine whether such wetlands have a significant nexus with traditional navigable waters. There is also a scientific need to understand how the normal lack of surface water connectivity affects function. Regarding the second question, neither HGM type nor non-adjacency adequately identifies wetlands surrounded by uplands. I contend that “GIW” remains the most informative option. However, the term needs to be applied properly and researchers should emphasize that being surrounded by uplands does not imply hydrological or biological isolation. Further, conclusions from one GIW type should be extrapolated to other GIWs with great care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babbitt KJ, Tanner GW (2000) Use of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape. Wetlands 20(2):313–322
Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 79 + app
Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, D.C.
Cowardin LM, Golet FC (1995) US Fish and Wildlife Service 1979 wetland classification: a review. Vegetatio 118(1–2):139–152
Downing D, Nadeau T-L, Kwok R (2007) Technical and scientific challenges in implementing Rapanos’ “water of the United States”. Nat Resour Environ 22(1):42–45 62-63
Downing DM, Winer C, Wood LD (2003) Navigating through Clean Water Act jurisdiction: a legal review. Wetlands 23(3):475–493
Frohn RC, Reif M, Lane C, Autrey B (2009) Satellite remote sensing of isolated wetlands using object-oriented classification of Landsat-7 data. Wetlands 29(3):931–941
Gibbons JW (2003) Terrestrial habitat: a vital component for herpetofauna of isolated wetlands. Wetlands 23(3):630–635
Golden HE, Lane CR, Amatya DM, Bandilla KW, Raanan Kiperwas H, Knightes CD, Ssegane H (2014) Hydrologic connectivity between geographically isolated wetlands and surface water systems: a review of select modeling methods. Environ Model Softw 53:190–206. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.004
Golden HE, Sander HA, Lane CR, Zhao C, Price K, D’Amico E, Christensen JR (2015) Relative effects of geographically isolated wetlands on streamflow: a watershed-scale analysis. Ecohydrology. doi:10.1002/eco.1608
Lane CR, D'Amico E, Autrey B (2012) Isolated wetlands of the southeastern United States: abundance and expected condition. Wetlands 32(4):753–767
Lang M, McDonough O, McCarty G, Oesterling R, Wilen B (2012) Enhanced detection of wetland-stream connectivity using LiDAR. Wetlands 32(3):461–473
Leibowitz SG (2003) Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23(3):517–531
Leibowitz SG, Wigington Jr PJ, Rains MC, Downing DM (2008) Non-navigable streams and adjacent wetlands: addressing science needs following the Supreme Court’s Rapanos decision. Front Ecol Environ 6(7):364–371
Marton JM, Creed IF, Lewis DB, Lane CR, Basu NB, Cohen MJ, Craft CB (2015) Geographically isolated wetlands are important biogeochemical reactors on the landscape. Bioscience. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv009
McDonough OT, Lang MW, Hosen JD, Palmer MA (2015) Surface hydrologic connectivity between Delmarva bay wetlands and nearby streams along a gradient of agricultural alteration. Wetlands 35(1):41–53. doi:10.1007/s13157-014-0591-5
McLaughlin DL, Kaplan DA, Cohen MJ (2014) A significant nexus: geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape hydrology. Water Resour Res 50(9):7153–7166. doi:10.1002/2013WR015002
Min J-H, Perkins DB, Jawitz JW (2010) Wetland-groundwater interactions in subtropical depressional wetlands. Wetlands 30(5):997–1006. doi:10.1007/s13157-010-0043-9
Mushet DM, Calhoun AJK, Alexander LC, Cohen MJ, DeKeyser ES, Fowler L, Lane CR, Lang MW, Rains MC, Walls SC (2015) Geographically isolated wetlands: rethinking a misnomer. Wetlands 35:423–431. doi:10.1007/s13157-015-0631-9
Mushet DM, Euliss NH, Stockwell CA (2012) Mapping anuran habitat suitability to estimate effects of grassland and wetland conservation programs. Copeia 2012(2):321–330
Nadeau T-L, Leibowitz SG (2003) Isolated wetlands: an introduction to the special issue. Wetlands 23(3):471–474
Nilsson KA, Rains MC, Lewis DB, Trout KE (2013) Hydrologic characterization of 56 geographically isolated wetlands in west-central Florida using a probabilistic method. Wetl Ecol Manag 21(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s11273-012-9275-1
Rains MC, Leibowitz SG, Cohen MJ, Creed IF, Golden HE, Jawitz JW, Kalla P, Lane CR, Lang MW, McLaughlin DL (2015) Geographically isolated wetlands are part of the hydrological landscape. Hydrol Process. doi:10.1002/hyp.10635
Shaw DA, Vanderkamp G, Conly FM, Pietroniro A, Martz L (2012) The fill-spill hydrology of prairie wetland complexes during drought and deluge. Hydrol Process 26(20):3147–3156. doi:10.1002/hyp.8390
Smith RD, Ammann A, Bartoldus C, Brinson MM (1995) An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. WRP-DE-9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Washington, D.C.
Snodgrass JW, Bryan Jr AL, Lide RF, Smith GM (1996) Factors affecting the occurrence and structure of fish assemblages in isolated wetlands of the upper coastal plain, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53(2):443–454
Subalusky AL, Fitzgerald LA, Smith LL (2009) Ontogenetic niche shifts in the American alligator establish functional connectivity between aquatic systems. Biol Conserv 142(7):1507–1514. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.019
Tiner RW (2003a) Estimated extent of geographically isolated wetlands in selected areas of the United States. Wetlands 23(3):636–652
Tiner RW (2003b) Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands 23(3):494–516
Tiner RW (2011) Dichotomous Keys and Mapping Codes for Wetland Landscape Position, Landform, Water Flow Path, and Waterbody Type Descriptors: Version 2.0. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA
U.S. EPA (2015) Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence. EPA/600/R-14/475F. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Van Meter KJ, Basu NB (2014) Signatures of human impact: size distributions and spatial organization of wetlands in the prairie pothole landscape. Ecol Appl 25(2):451–465. doi:10.1890/14-0662.1
Wilcox BP, Dean DD, Jacob JS, Sipocz A (2011) Evidence of surface connectivity for Texas Gulf Coast depressional wetlands. Wetlands 31(3):451–458
Winter TC, LaBaugh JW (2003) Hydrologic considerations in defining isolated wetlands. Wetlands 23(3):532–540
Acknowledgments
This paper is an outgrowth, in part, of the “Geographically Isolated Wetlands Research Workshop” that was convened and co-hosted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development and the Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center that was held in Newton, GA, November 18-21, 2013. I thank the workshop organizers and all participants for stimulating and thought-provoking discussions. Thanks also to James Jawitz, Kay Kirkman, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on this manuscript. I am indebted to Rose Kwok of EPA’s Wetlands Division for helping me summarize post-Rapanos guidance and the new Clean Water Rule. I would especially like to acknowledge Dave Mushet for serving as a worthy, but gentlemanly, debate partner. The information in this document has been funded entirely by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This manuscript has been subjected to Agency review and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leibowitz, S.G. Geographically Isolated Wetlands: Why We Should Keep the Term. Wetlands 35, 997–1003 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0691-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0691-x